The advantage and curse of doing this blog for quite some time is that everything is archived and there to be looked at (and used against me). Right now, fan sentiment is split on Wannstedt. Honestly, that’s where I am. Split on the coach. Not sure how I feel about him in the long-term; but sure that he will be here through next year. I thought it might be useful to look back at the month of December, 2004 to review what happened at that point.

Obviously, it began with Walt Harris being pushed out the door with no extension and an offer from Stanford. Arguably this was coming after the disappointing 2003 season and the implosion of the 2004 recruiting class — even if in hindsight Pitt may have dodged a lot of disappointments. I was not sure about the whole thing.

I’ve gone back and forth on this all season. I’ve passionately wanted Harris’ tenure ended, I’ve defended him and felt he earned a new extension, I’ve sadly concluded it to be best he leave, I’ve reluctantly announced he wasn’t taking Pitt in the right direction long term. That was all in this season.

…

I guess the issue of whether Harris should have stayed or been released, for me, came down to, “do I trust the administration to hire someone better?” That’s probably why I decided to hope Pitt retained Harris.

Names were immediately bandied about: Rhoads, Wannstedt, Russ Grimm, Bo Pelini, Sal Sunseri, Bob Davie, Tom Clements, Tom Bradley and Rick Neuheisel. I wanted Pitt to look to the MAC coaches like Hoeppner, Novak or Amstutz.

J.D. Brookhart never was given serious consideration. Wannstedt was always the top choice by Pitt. Matt Cavanaugh’s name surfaced right after Wannstedt first pulled his name, and Rhoads got one of the first interviews. Rhoads became an early favorite after it became obvious that Pitt wasn’t serious about a lot of names — Sunseri was given a token interview and they never even made contact with Tom Clements or Tom Bradley.

There was a lot of polite interviews given to former Pitt players turned coaches like Tim Lewis and Cavanaugh. Along with finally interviewing Pelini. Briefly becoming the rumored front runner. Much of the discussion of who Pitt should look to hire post-Harris focused on recruiting acumen. An interesting little excerpt from that time:

The lifeblood of a football program, of course, is recruiting. Chuck Finder writes a sure-to-infuriate-the-locals piece arguing that Western PA isn’t what it used to be in terms of quantity of top recruits. He points out the demographics have been shrinking in the region. (Something I think Lee has pointed out before). He’s not arguing that the well is dry. He is just saying that the talent level, locally is not what it was in the ’70s and early ’80s. It’s a fair point, but one I’m sure many people in Pittsburgh will not want to hear.

The Trib’s recruiting guy, Kevin Gorman, though argues that the next Pitt coach has to focus very, very hard on the WPIAL kids. He points to the kids that have been flowing to the Big 11. I agree that Pitt really, really needs to improve the local recruiting. Gorman, though, seems a little too close to the subject. He covers the recruiting in the region, he knows all the kids and the coaches. So, it seems he is overstating the overall talent level. In some points, he seems to suggest recruiting a couple kids, just to win points with their high school coaches for the future.

Of course, last month Chris Dokish made a point about the talent level in the WPIAL not being the end-all-be-all.

One other guy, Pitt may have interviewed — Miami DC Randy Shannon.

Cavanaugh started picking up momentum as Pelini lost momentum. I started becoming convinced then and remain to this point of the belief that Pelini will be a very good head coach some day but is an absolutely lousy interview — and that has cost him opportunities to this point. Including the Syracuse gig.

More disturbing Paul Rhoads seemed to be the co-leader (and Smizik had a column that I had to admit was worth reading and that I agreed). In fact, just as it appeared that Rhoads would be the guy to get the gig, Wannstedt’s name re-emerged. It also came out how little Pitt was willing to pay assistants until it came to getting Wannstedt.

One of the other sticking points last week according to a source was that the university was reluctant to meet Wannstedt’s demands for salaries for his assistant coaches. He reportedly had asked for no assistant to be paid less than $100,000, and he wanted between $250,000-$300,000 for his coordinators.

The majority of the current staff makes less than $100,000 — with a low of about $65,000 — with the exception of defensive coordinator Paul Rhoads, who got a significant raise following the 2002 season because he nearly took a similar job at Auburn. He makes approximately $250,000 a year.

Over the years, retaining staff has been an issue because the university has not paid the assistant coaches the equivalent of many other Bowl Championship Series conference schools.

Of course, as we’ve learned 3 years later, you still have to make good hires with the assistants.

When Wanny finally agreed I was relieved because that meant Paul Rhoads didn’t get the job and I didn’t have to give up my season tickets in protest.

As for now, Pitt won’t be firing Wannstedt this year. There is no Athletic Director. Wannstedt is close with Chancellor Nordenberg who pulls the strings on this.

There was a lot of sentiment that Pitt needed to hire a Pitt guy. It’s a strangely (at least to me) common theme when there is a job opening for Pitt. Hire a Pitt guy or someone from the area. Fear the possibility of stepping stone coaches or something else.

In hindsight, I think the sentiment to find someone with ties was overwhelming and perhaps even necessary after everything else that had happened before.

Joe Starkey’s ESPN.com Big East Notebook (Insider subs.) doesn’t offer much but he notes the home attendance average for each team with 1-3 home games left.

1. West Virginia — 60,535 (+1762 from 2006), 3 games remaining
2. USF — 51,075 (+20,853), 2 remaining
3. Rutgers — 43,682 (+2569), 1 remaining
4. Louisville — 39,935 (-1547), 1 remaining
5. UConn — 37,487 (-1452), 2 remaining
6. Syracuse — 35,397 (-1865), 2 remaining
7. Pitt — 34,141 (-9164), 2 remaining
8. Cinci — 28,859 (+8486), 2 remaining

Wow. Who knew Pitt’s attendance ranking would appear to have a good shot of matching the likely spot Pitt finishes in the Big East?

This is bad news for the athletic department. Point to 2008 all you want as the season, but attendance usually doesn’t get the bounce (or drop) until the year after — Louisville seems to be the lone exception to this. The Pitt Athletic Department has a lot of heavy lifting to do if it wants people to show up next season.

The school can keep honoring the past great teams all it wants. And seemingly over, and over this week it’s the 1982 team — and I would swear some variation on this was done just a couple years ago? After a point though, it would be nice to see something worth remembering in the present.

It isn’t the lousy home schedule this year. It may not have helped, but fans had little hope if the team that was beaten horribly to end last year was going to be worse this year. Next year the schedule may be improved — but it still looks to have two MAC teams in the non-con (which is a marginal improvement since it means no officially 1-AA teams).

Q: Do you have any idea what the non-conference schedule will be for next year? I’ve heard that Central Florida is pulling out of the game scheduled for next year . Do you know the replacement?

ZEISE: It isn’t finished yet but it is getting close. Apparently they are working on a deal to play Bowling Green — the game that was supposed to be played this year — as well as closing in on a deal to play Buffalo. And yes, Central Florida has opted out of the game which means the home schedule next year — assuming both of the aforementioned deals get done — would be Buffalo, Bowling Green, Iowa, Rutgers, West Virginia and Louisville and the away schedule would be Notre Dame, Navy, Syracuse, Cincinnati, South Florida and Connecticut.

Great. Pitt has been punked by UCF. That feels good.

Starkey can point to an attitude change by the players. That’s great. I don’t want to put it down, but that only goes so far and can only be sustained so long. The players and the fans need the wins soon.

The poor attendance won’t directly affect any coaching shake-up at this point. It will be a subtle underlying thing. If the fans aren’t showing up and they don’t believe in the progress to put the money forth, that will have an affect. Because, you just know that Wannstedt is going to point to the progress and “improvement” on the defense. And that the O-line is “improving.” That staying the course with the present coaches is best. If the changes, though, aren’t made with DC Rhoads and O-Line Coach Dunn, that isn’t going to help.

Do you ever get the feeling there is a bit of regret amidst present and former Pitt decision makers about not hiring (now) LSU defensive coordinator and the hot head coaching candidate, Bo Pelini?

Word is as A.D. at Pitt, Long was interested in hiring Pelini but was rebuffed by higher-ups and tabbed Dave Wannstedt. Maybe Long will make a play for Pelini this time.

Mmm-hmm. That reminded me of something I read earlier this month in a Zeise chat.

ticktockman: What role does Jerry Cochran play in this program? We’ve sucked through various AD’s and Coaches, but he has been a constant it seems.

Paul Zeise: I’m not sure how much he has to do with the program. I know his first choice for the head coach the last time was Bo Pelini and he was obviously over ruled, so while he has some say, he clearly doesn’t have the final authority to do anything.

That leaves the blame all on Chancellor Nordenberg as Chochran and Long apparently have quietly whispered in different reporters’ ears how they wanted Pelini a few years ago. That is assuming both are being truthful and not engaging in a bit of revisionism.

It took longer than I expected, but sure enough there was the obligatory “bring back Pederson” column.

Pitt now needs Pederson more than ever.

That will be obvious today when the Panthers play host to Cincinnati. There probably will be a crowd of 30,000 or so — less than half the capacity at Heinz Field — to see a Pitt team that has lost four games in a row and is headed toward a third consecutive season without a bowl game. Pederson hardly would recognize the program.

It’s fair to think Pitt football wouldn’t have sunk back if Pederson had stayed. He left because Nebraska is home, he went to school at Nebraska and Nebraska was his dream job. That he wasn’t successful there — at least not fast enough to satisfy the tough Nebraska crowd — isn’t enough reason for Nordenberg not to bring him back.

It’s also “fair” to think that it would. Cook ignores the fact that Pederson tried to hire Wanny before getting to Callahan. Nothing an AD could do would change the situation of the football program if the team is lousy.

It’s a throwaway column based on events from 5 years prior. By all accounts, Pederson caused plenty of friction at Nebraska from the fans to the boosters to the morale of the department. Cook disputes it because others, while at Pitt, spoke well of him. I’m convinced.

Steve Pederson coming back to Pitt now that he is looking for a new job is a bad idea. Okay? Pitt and sequels just don’t work. This is not about wanting a Pitt guy/gal as the AD — I don’t particularly care. I want the best person for the job. Not someone the Chancellor already knows and may be comfortable with dealing.

Pederson did a lot of good and some bad while at Pitt. He wasn’t the god/savior some make him seem for dragging the primary teams in the athletic department into the modern era, improving the facilities and finally getting a new basketball facility constructed. Nor was he the devil for changing the colors, logo and name and tearing down Pitt Stadium. For the most part he was a good athletic director who provided and acted in a way that helped Pitt. That doesn’t mean he should be brought back now that his alma mater has said “buh-bye.”

I’m sure there will be a column in the next day or two suggesting that it would be a good idea to bring back Pederson. That he would provide the energy to the athletic department and will make the hard choices, etc.

Feh. That’s just code for dealing with the only major public concern regarding the athletic department. Right now the issue is about the football program and its direction. Does the baseball program need shaken up? How about the men’s or women’s basketball? No. I don’t think so.

The athletic department could probably benefit overall from someone aggressive and with personality. It doesn’t, however, need the overhaul and makeover as before. Things have changed.

Bringing back Pederson would be taking the easy way, rather than being serious about looking for a new AD. It would also be one more sign that the athletic department is being run via proxy by Chancellor Nordenberg.

Addition: Naturally, that was also the one topic on Zeise’s Q&A today. He’s slightly more receptive to it, but doubts Pederson would be interested.

ESPN has played the Mike Gundy tirade as often as they possibly can. Hey, it’s filler so that they don’t need any more original programming; as if showing SportsCenter 15 times a day wasn’t enough. I swear I’ve seen it a hundred times (and you can too). I like what Gundy did — his stock with the entire team is through the roof now. The article in question began like this:

Bobby Reid stood near the team charters last Friday night, using his cell phone, eating his boxed meal.

It would’ve been normal post-game activity but for one thing.

His mother was feeding him chicken.

Which brings us to the quarterback switch-a-roo at Oklahoma State.

The first thought that ran through my head with this was the similarity to Pat Bostick’s situation. A member of the media (ESPN Radio’s Mark Madden) made a comment about a player that delves into his personal life (about the supposed “panic attacks”). Just sayin’.

The game this week is on ESPNU. Pitt would rather be on a “national” channel that a large majority of their fans don’t even get rather than be an ABC/ESPN Regional game that most fans can actually watch. Fans always come first to the Pitt athletic department, no question. Maybe I’ll go to a restaurant and watch the game. Maybe I’ll listen to Hillgrove and Fralic on the radio. Perhaps I’ll actually enjoy my Saturday night and not even watch/listen instead of Pitt ruining another beautiful weekend night for me.

Virginia is 3-1, including a tight win over Georgia Tech last week. In SI’s power rankings, they come in at 43 (with Pitt at 78). Virginia sophomore QB Jameel Sewell has picked it up in the last few games after playing horrendously in the opener, a loss against Wyoming. Since that ugly game, he’s completed 64.3 percent of his passes for 333 yards and three touchdowns.

More importantly, Sewell has contributed in three wins for the Cavaliers (3-1, 3-0 ACC), which includes the most recent victory, a 28-23 decision over Georgia Tech. Against the Yellow Jackets’ vaunted blitz-happy defense, Sewell passed for a 177 yards and guided the team on two lengthy touchdown drives.

The Pitt defense’s ability to get into Sewell’s head early and throw him off for the entire game is a possibility, and a key to a Panthers victory. Too bad he’ll have all day to throw like every other QB we’ve faced this year. For now, we’re 7-point underdogs.

As I said, I don’t have a clue who the next AD will be. I’m not buying that Wannstedt will be looking to fill the role now or in the near future. Old names from the last search are brought up again.

Potential candidates could include Pitt’s last interim athletic director, Marc Boehm, now an executive associate athletic director at Nebraska, as well as three athletic directors who interviewed in ‘03: Cincinnati’s Mike Thomas, Central Florida’s Keith Tribble and Florida Atlantic’s Craig Angelos.

Another notable name that has surfaced is Tom Donahoe, a former Steelers director of football operations and president/general manager of the Buffalo Bills. Donahoe received a personal guided tour by Wannstedt during a visit to Pitt’s Duratz Athletic Complex last month.

Not quite following why Donahoe would take a pay cut and prestige drop from the NFL, but let the rumors fly. As for Marc Boehm, returning if offered. I think that would be awkward.

Boehm is well-acquainted with Pitt, having been Steve Pederson’s right-hand man for six years before Pederson left for the athletic director’s job at Nebraska in late 2002. Boehm served as Pitt’s interim athletic director for 4¹/₂ months and was the top candidate to replace Pederson.

But with Nordenberg and the rest of the university administration preoccupied with the search for men’s and women’s basketball coaches — a process Boehm helped facilitate — Boehm grew weary of waiting for Nordenberg to hire him full-time and followed Pederson to Nebraska in May 2002 to accept a position Pederson created specifically for him.

Unbeknownst to Boehm until late in the process, the eight-person search committee had unanimously voted to name him as the successor to Pederson. Nordenberg asked Boehm to reconsider, but the chancellor never offered him a contract. That led to a hasty search by the committee that ended two weeks later when Nordenberg appointed Long as Pederson’s replacement.

Chancellor Nordenberg really does dawdle over these contracts for ADs, doesn’t he? I realize money and time can heal a lot of wounds, but Boehm coming back would seem uncomfortable. How much would he really feel he could trust Nordenberg to back him and not, ultimately, undermine him.

I also don’t by the revisionism that the school was “preoccupied” by the men’s and women’s coaching job vacancies to deal with the AD issue. The coaching vacancies came well after the AD vacancy.  In fact, part of why you have an AD is to lead the search for new coaches. The more I read that bit, the less sense it makes. Pitt’s men’s basketball coaching search had Skip Prosser at the top of the list and part of why he didn’t take it was that Pitt had no full-time AD and Nordenberg didn’t even assure Prosser that Boehm would be the guy.

That said, revisionism, doesn’t just apply to the time with Boehm. Long gets ripped on his way out the door.

Long’s biggest failure was his inability to maintain the season-ticket base for what should be the school’s flagship athletic program — football.

Pederson’s marketing initiatives led to the sale of 42,544 non-club season-tickets in 2003, a school record, and the establishment of a waiting list to buy season tickets for 2004.

Today, one literally cannot give away Pitt football tickets.

Puh-lease. At least rip on Long for things he actually did wrong. Heading into 2003, what had the season tickets sold-out was not any marketing initiatives, it was that Pitt was a preseason top-20 team that had the label of “darkhorse” Big East champion. A team that finished 2002 so strong, and looked poised to go farther. Instead, the season went to crap, the recruiting class was trashed and the head coach lost the majority of fan support.

Winning puts people in the stands, not “marketing initiatives.” Those only get their attention and might attract some first-timers.

Pitt is struggling with home attendance because the team isn’t that good and the home schedule is worse this year. Some of that is the weirdness of the Big East putting Louisville and West Virginia (and now Rutgers) all on the same home/away pace for Pitt so the Big East portion of the schedule is pitiful. The non-con  is distinctly bad as a consequence of balancing the road games to Michigan State and Virginia. That part you can pin on Long.
Smizik also goes after Long, for being a caretaker rather than dynamic.

His two most notable undertakings were the hiring of Dave Wannstedt as football coach and a fundraising campaign tied to season-ticket purchases for men’s basketball. Wannstedt, who also was enthusiastically endorsed by Chancellor Mark Nordenberg, remains a work in progress. He has been a disappointment thus far, but it’s too early to make any kind of final judgment. The fundraising program was a success but not before it enraged some fans and forced a lawsuit that, in effect, was won by the plaintiffs.

Under Long, the men’s basketball program continued to flourish and he was able to fend off schools, notably Arizona State, trying to hire coach Jamie Dixon. The women’s program grew significantly under coach Agnus Berenato, who, like Dixon, was at Pitt before Long. Pitt’s hosting of the NCAA women’s basketball tournament first- and second-round games last season was a major step for the program and that success came on Long’s watch.

Let’s be somewhat realistic. The football and basketball programs had already been revised and dragged into the modern world of college athletics. There was success occurring in those sports. Exactly how was the AD supposed to do more with those parts, other than just try to make sure they keep moving in the right direction and keep the money moving? You really want an AD to tinker with what was going in the right direction? Jeff Long had been focusing on the rest of the  athletic department that needed updated facilities, money and direction — which meant taking the hit for the fundraising by reseating for the Quest for Excellence.

College baseball is getting more attention each year. Pitt is finally on the way to having a modest ball field. Not to mention on-site facilities for the other sports to have practices and games — rather than going out into the burbs to high school fields.

Again, if you want to rip Long for being somewhat aloof, tin eared and actual sins committed that’s fine.  To essentially make crap up, bothers me.

So yeah. I’m tired of the Pitt-Penn State thing for this calendar year. Unless they actually draw up a contract, I think we’ve gone deep enough into the issue (especially in this post). Until anything is made official (probably shortly after Paterno is buried), we’ll get this type of thing.

Yesterday, Paterno was asked during his weekly news conference if he would be in favor of playing Pitt on a six-and-four basis — six home games for the Nittany Lions and four away — over a 10-year period.

I’m exhausted of talking about the Pitt-PSU subject, and I don’t think that Paterno is actually serious with what he says. All this does is deflect some of the criticism directed at him, and he even tries to pass it off as AD Tim Curley’s choice. They have a home and home series with Syracuse starting next year — if we’re so “inferior” to them, why do they go and schedule a series with a team that is similar if not worse than us. Scared we’ll pull an upset?

Jeff Long is gone as expected at this point. Hell of a bump in salary. He was making around $200 K at Pitt, and Arkansas came in with $450,000. That sort of cash will go a long way at Wal-Mart.

No way Pitt was going to match that — especially when Pitt’s extension negotiations stalled out earlier this spring/summer. That kind of bump in salary  comes at a cost. Dealing with the Houston Nutt/Las Cronicas Locas De Boss Hawg stuff. Not to mention a fanbase with contingent unable to distinguish reality from satire. Wow.

I have no idea who will be the next AD. I can tell you it won’t be any former player now doing commentary for the WWL. As I tried to point out earlier, the nature of the AD job is so different from even 15 years ago. Gladhanding and raising money for the Athletic Department is vital, but it is only a component of what the job demands these days. I only want Pitt to find and hire the best person for the job.
In the interim, Donna Sanft, the Senior Associate Athletic Director for Administration, Compliance and Student Life can add “interim AD” to her resume.

Chancellor Nordenberg has already formed an athletic director search committee to be chaired by Jerry Cochran, Pitt’s executive vice chancellor and general counsel. The committee will include Susan Albrecht, Pitt NCAA faculty athletic representative; Tom Bigley, a member of the Board of Trustees and former chair of the athletics committee; Marcus Bowman, director of athletic business operations and former walk-on basketball player under Coach Dixon; Kirk Bruce, assistant athletic director for Olympic sports and former Pitt basketball player in the early 70s and Pitt women’s basketball coach in the 80s and 90s.; John Conomikes, a member of the Board of Trustees and chair of the athletics committee; and Carol Sprague, senior associate athletic director.

They have, apparently, started work immediately. Whether Chancellor Nordenberg will do anything with their recommendations is a different issue (see, 2003). I do expect the job to draw a fair amount of interest. There are still only 65 BCS schools (and only 64 of them have athletic director positions).

Looks like Pitt will be in a position to find another prominent person for their athletic department. First it was the coaches; Dixon, then Wannstedt. Now, it’s the guy who hired/kept those two.

Pittsburgh athletic director Jeff Long will replace Frank Broyles in the same position at Arkansas, a person with knowledge of Long’s decision said Monday.

Broyles is retiring as the Razorbacks’ athletic director at the end of this year, and a person familiar with Long’s decision said he will leave Pitt to take over at Arkansas. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the announcement had not been made.

Arkansas would not confirm Long’s hiring, but spokesman Tysen Kendig said a news conference was set for Tuesday afternoon regarding the athletic program.

Arkansas’ search had been a secretive one until last week, when Stanley Reed, chairman of the school’s board of trustees, confirmed that Long was “a strong candidate.” (The WWL)

It was looking more and more apparent that this was going to happen, but the press conference that Arkansas will hold tomorrow will probably confirm it. ESPN doesn’t usually put up items that turn out to be untrue (except saying Mike Vick wouldn’t plead guilty) so to me, this is a done deal. The AP story mentions that Long has few ties to Arkansas, a point echoed by a writer in that area. The question that matters — who’s the next Pitt AD?

Update: Two more stories from the local TV stations down there.