masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
February 9, 2007

Hoops Talk

Filed under: Basketball,Players,Tactics — Chas @ 12:12 pm

Ray Fittipaldo has his Q&A and chat on Pitt basketball.

Q: You answered a question about Dixon by noting that he is signed through the 2012-13 season. However, as we all know, the contract of a college coach is about as binding as Anthony Morelli’s verbal commitment was to Pitt, right? So what good would that be if Dixon’s dream job comes calling?

FITTIPALDO: You’re absolutely correct, Bob. Coach’s contracts are not worth the paper they are printed on. If it’s any peace of mind, Dixon said all the right things after signing the contract, like how he felt at home and how he wanted to raise his family here. I suppose it’s up to each individual out there to make up their own mind about believing what he said.

I gotta admit, I’m not sweating this issue this year. I don’t sweat it, generally because I think Dixon really wants to stay (based on no actual proof other than my gut); but he will listen periodically to make sure Pitt periodically kicks up the salary.

This year, though, has nothing that really worries me. There are no schools in the other BCS conferences that would have openings this year that are or are potentially near Pitt at this time. The SEC? Maybe Kentucky jettisons Tubby Smith, but I don’t see Coach Dixon as a target. The ACC? Really only Miami and Haith seem to be nearing a split, but that would be a step down. Big 11? I suppose Michigan or even Illinois might make a coaching change, but neither seems particularly attractive at this point by comparison. The Big 12 has Colorado looking for a new coach, but they’ll be going cheap — plus they suck and have no real support. The PAC-10 actually is stable this year.

And from the chat, some questions about Mike Cook and, um, invaluability (yes, I know it isn’t a real word).

PittHoopsatPittBlather: What do you think has been the biggest reason Mike Cook has struggled the past two games (shooting 1-14 from the field). I figured he may have been a bit nervous at Villanova playing in front of his family, but after last night, I’m clueless. Do you think it’s a cause of concern?

Ray Fittipaldo: If it goes into the next game, I’d start getting concerned. He did play well the two games prior to Villanova. Maybe he’s going through a little slump. It happens. If he does continue to struggle, Dixon does not have many options. He could replace Cook with Benjamin, but Benjamin has always been a role player, not a starter. The only other option is Gilbert Brown, but Dixon would have to burn his redshirt if he played him now.

wow11: Is it time to sit Mike Cook down? He’s killing us out there right now with too many bad shots, turnovers, careless defense, I think its time for a change …

Ray Fittipaldo: Who plays in his place? I love Benjamin’s game, but he seems to thrive in his reserve role. As I said before, do you want to burn Brown’s redshirt year and hope he can come in and play significant minutes in the NCAA tournament after sitting the bench the whole season? The best bet is to coach Cook up in the next few weeks and try to limit his mistakes.

PittHoopsatPittBlather: While it’s a good thing that Pitt has so many players that can step up and have good games any given night, it seems like because of that, some players completely disappear at other times. After Gray, who in your opinion, is the player we can least afford to have an off night come tournament time?

Ray Fittipaldo: I would say Ramon because of his 3-point shooting ability. He made two big 3-pointers in the second half last night that kept WVU at a comfortable distance. Pitt is going to need someone to step up and make 3s in the tournament. Ramon cannot have a terrible shooting night or it could spell trouble.

The only concern with Ramon even if he’s shooting well. Can he get open? I love seeing Ramon shoot (most of the time), but he is best when he has a chance to spot up or a catch and shoot — preferably off of a screen. The scariest thing when he is shooting, is when he is trying to create his own space for a shot.
While there is some speculation as to whether Young will see more minutes, there is little question that Kendall will continue to start.

Kendall is averaging more rebounds and assists.

“Sam hasn’t been showing as much pain in the past,” senior Antonio Graves said. “In the beginning of the season, that was holding him down. Now he’s a lot more explosive in practice and dunking more in practice. He’s more energetic.

“He’s coming along at the right time. … It adds to our depth and makes us more dangerous. That’s the thing about this team. We are able to make a substitution and not lose anything.”

Young wouldn’t give his perspective. He has barely spoken to the media since an 18-point performance against Dayton two days before Christmas. But history shows that seniors — at least the good ones — almost always start ahead of underclassmen at Pitt. Since October, Big East coaches have said the 6-foot-10, 225-pound Kendall is one of the most underappreciated forwards in the conference.

You know, I do think Kendall does do a lot of little things, and fits well with the team. Still, I can’t help but wonder if the other coaches like to cite Kendall and puff him much the way they do losing coaches from their conference — you know, so they can keep beating a team rather then risk someone competent get the job.

Whether luck or skill, Pitt’s perimeter defense has been much better this year.

Opponents are shooting 29.6 percent from behind the 3-point arc compared to 34.6 percent last season. And those double-digit 3-point barrages have gone by the wayside. Only one team managed to make 10 3-pointers in a game this season, and that happened in the first game against Western Michigan.

“We’re better guarding on the perimeter, there’s no question,” Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said. “We’re better guarding the dribbler as well as getting out on shooters. It’s improved a lot throughout the year. That’s the area where we’ve improved the most and it has to continue.”

“Our attitude has changed this year,” sophomore point guard Levance Fields said. “We’re in the gaps more. We’re preparing ahead of time. The one thing coach has stressed to us is communicating. Everyone is talking to each other this year. We’re talking each other through everything.”





“You know, I do think Kendall does do a lot of little things, and fits well with the team. Still, I can’t help but wonder if the other coaches like to cite Kendall and puff him much the way they do losing coaches from their conference — you know, so they can keep beating a team rather then risk someone competent get the job.”

Have to agree with your assumption there. Young brings more energy, scoring, and defensive qucikness when his knees are not going tendo on him. I know Pitt has the recent history of letting the seiniors play but sure wish they would let SY get the start at PF.

With the NCAAs coming would it not be benefical for the team to have him start and have Kendall coming of the bench to spell Young and/or Gray? He is already spelling Gray.

Comment by Kenny 02.09.07 @ 1:46 pm

Ain’t gonna happen. Hopefully they play him more.

Comment by Omar 02.09.07 @ 1:54 pm

Doesn’t matter who starts. I’ts all up to Dixon to manage the minutes and base his substitution patterns according to who they’re playing. When they’re playing a team with a smallish 4-man, he can get away with Young playing more minutes. When he’s playing a bigger team, then Kendall needs to stay out of foul trouble (he’s a foul machine) so he can help Gray inside. Unfortunately Dixon has not yet shown the ability to understand match-up substitutions, so I’m just doing wishful thinking here.

And the stuff about Pitt’s perimeter D being better or even much above average is a bunch of crap. The league stinks, so they haven’t had to face much outside firepower this year. WVU had tons of open 3s against them, but it wasn’t like Pittsnogle and Gansey were shooting them anymore. Same with Villanova — it was a lot easier guarding Reynolds and Nardi than guarding Foye and Ray with Lowry distributing it.

Pitt’s D on the perimeter is nothing great, but it’s not terrible either. Ramon and Graves (and Benjamin, when he gets time) are tough man-on-man, Fields is barely average and Cook is lackadaisical at best. By far the best thing about Pitt’s defense this year is how Gray has avoided foul trouble. Rather amazing, when you think about it. Even though he’s not a shot-blocker, he has managed to stay a presence in the middle and that’s worth a lot.

Comment by andre aldridge 02.09.07 @ 2:08 pm

Pitt has played above-average perimeter defense against everyone. Krauser gambled too much on defense and gave up a lot of three point shots. That is why the perimeter defense is better. Simple. Additionally we have more size on the perimeter this year with Cook and Graves. That makes it more difficult for the opposition to get clean looks. The only time we struggle against the three is when Gray has to defend it.

Comment by Omar 02.09.07 @ 3:40 pm

I have to agree with Andre Aldridge. I read that blurb from Dixon about this being “the best defensive group” he’s coached, and my eyes nearly popped out of my skull. Whah??????

That’s absolutely insane. These guys aren’t anywhere near the defenders that Brown, Page and Knight were.

Comment by Jeff 02.09.07 @ 5:06 pm

Also there’s a football Q&A up:
link to post-gazette.com

Comment by Chris 02.09.07 @ 5:13 pm

I have the gut feeling that Dixon will be our coach for a long, long time, perhaps the rest of his career. Pitt is no longer a “stepping stone” job. When you build a $129M on campus BB arena, on an urban campus, the players and the fans will follow. In fact, the Pitt job has all the makings of a “dream” job in the future.

Comment by HbgFrank 02.09.07 @ 5:26 pm

never can be too sure. howland had stronger ties to pitt than dixon does (daughter attends pitt, his wife reportedly didnt want to move, etc). everyone talks about pitt’s facilities and not being a stepping stone anymore, which is all true, but dixon almost jumped to Ariz St last year. while the campus and the tempe area is much much nicer than oakland (my sister went to ASU), pitt has them beat by far on everything else. even so, the reports said that dixon was considering the jump.
i got jumped all over when i said sean miller as the next pitt coach a few months back, but if jamie ever thinks the grass is greener or he has a falling out with the administration, it can happen.

Comment by matt 02.09.07 @ 6:16 pm

I just can’t see Dixon walking away in the near future (2-3 years). Call me crazy, but I’ve a feeling that he’s the kinda guy who’s concerned about building a legacy as well as making a living.

I can see him using other teams’ interest in him as a negotiating tool for a bigger salary, but that’s just par for the course in college sports these days.

Comment by Shawn 02.09.07 @ 6:54 pm

Dixon to Chatham by 2009.

Comment by Chris 02.09.07 @ 7:40 pm

I think that if Dixon bolted to the Pac-10 for example, there is a high percentage chance that Sean Miller leaves his team in mid free throw. I think he’s a good coach but we could prob pull someone from the ACC(Prosser comes to mind). You would have to also consider Phil Martelli from St Joes because of his Philly connection(not sure how that would work with Mike Rice). What’s Quin Snyder doing? I think he would make a good assistant if we lose another one, he’s got nice hair.
I do hope Dixon stays though..it was the best decision to stay for both him and the school. ASU basketball is horrible but I could see good things happening to them in the future.

Comment by Panthoor 02.09.07 @ 7:56 pm

In the event that Dixon left, I could see John Calipari getting some serious consideration from Jeff Long and company. He doesn’t have the greatest reputation, but he’s done well at Memphis, and unless I’m mistaken, had expressed interest in the job when Ben Howland left.

Comment by Jeff 02.09.07 @ 9:15 pm

The thing is, I don’t think Dixon was really all that ready to leave last year. He simply used the situation as a way to get more money from Pitt, which is what he should have done. The ASU program is in a spin.

Comment by Eric R 02.09.07 @ 11:09 pm

[…] Looking over Providence’s schedule, you see wins over Boston College (when BC was ranked 23rd at the time) and a win over Marquette at the Dunkin’ Donuts Center on January 4. As discussed in this post about the possibility of mixing up the starting line up–notably putting Sam Young in and taking out Levon Kendall–well, don’t expect anything to change anytime soon. Even with Young coming off of a great performance over West Virginia and averaging 5.7 points in 14.7 minutes per game, Kendall will continue to get the starting nod (with 5.3 points in 26.2 minutes per game). Dixon is quoted as saying he loves having a new guy who breaks out every game and the writer’s continue to ask if that player will get more minutes. When another guy comes along the next game and puts up a load of points, then he’s the focus of writers who ask about getting more time. Translation: One 21-point performance will not dictate a change to a system that has proven to be successful the past four years. For the most part, seniors start and underclassmen come off the bench if the competition is close. […]


Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter