masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
September 1, 2007

Stull Injures Thumb

Filed under: Football,Injury,Players — Dennis @ 10:45 pm

Just got back from Heinz Field; glad we picked up the win and I’m sure Chas and I will talk about it much more in depth over the next few days. One of the more important story lines to come from this game was QB Bill Stull’s injury.

In the third quarter, when Kevan Smith came in for Stull, I just assumed that we were going to give Smith (and possibly Bostick) a chance to show what they can do. Stull then walked to the tunnel and apparently was given quick x-rays and even though he came back on the sidelines, he never went back into the game. He was definitely trying to keep movement of his lower right arm to a minimum.

Dave Wannstedt on the radio postgame show said that after a play, an EMU player actually grabbed Stull’s thumb and pulled or bent it backwards. He also said a few more tests will be done tomorrow to determine the future.

The radio guys also mentioned that TE John Pelusi might have been injured but he should be fine for next week. I was really impressed with how he played tonight, both blocking and catching passes.

UPDATE: Damn

Pitt quarterback Bill Stull is out indefinitely after requiring surgery today to repair torn ligaments in the thumb on his right (throwing) hand.

“We feel very disappointed for Billy,” Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt said. “He worked incredibly hard during the off-season to earn the starting job and those efforts showed in his strong play last night. Knowing Billy, he will be very diligent in his rehabilitation and be back as soon as possible.”





First off – Hail to Pitt!!!

It was great to be back at Heinz Field to watch our beloved Panthers after my hiatus for the past two seasons (thanks Uncle Sam). Watching the guys hit the gridiron and get the victory was great. It brought back such fond memories… like when we had an O-Line.

Yes, I said it! We all were saying it last night too! Our offensive line leaks more than a South Side drunk on a dumpster after last call. We couldn’t run anything up the middle for the vast majority of the game and our pass protection looked questionable. And this was against EMU for crying out loud! I saw a little of the Michigan State game footage and got a real bad feeling about 2 weeks from now. That’s just the tip fo the iceberg. Wait til we get get into the meat of the schedule against our Big East brethren. It looks like we are in for a rough one this year if the things don’t change soon (like yesterday)!

Think we could get some fo the old greats like May, Fralic, and Stepnoski to come out of retirement and suit up for a few games?

Comment by Nick A. 09.02.07 @ 9:18 am

Re: Yesterday and rest of our opponnets. Based on yeaterday’s results only–we should beat Grambling, Virginia, Navy, Syracuse. Connecticut and Cincinatti had blow outs but played teams so weak (yes-EMU would beat those teams) that it is hard to tell how we would do vs these BE opponents. Rutgers and South Florida did what they were supposed to do-no more and are probably toss-ups right now. Michigan State, Louisville and West Virginia look like certain losses for us at this point.

Comment by Pitt1972 09.02.07 @ 9:52 am

Stull hurt his hand/wrist/thumb…whatever, in the play before the pitch that almost was a fumble…this was the play when he was sacked. Once again the offensive line, let our quarterback get lit up….

Comment by Marco 09.02.07 @ 11:05 am

App. State looked HOT! HOT! HOT!

it had to be said

Comment by Ryan M 09.02.07 @ 11:08 am

pitt 1972-
it was only one game for everyone. Good Win. We see exactly what DW wants to do this season. To be honest we cant draw any concrete conclusion because this is the first time all the teams got to hit someone in a different uniform. Also look at the UM vs App St game- everyone -players, fans, experts, and alumni, thought that was an easy win. EVERYONE WAS WRONG bc APP ST came to play- REMEMBER- ANY GIVEN SATURDAY.

Next up is Grambling- I am hoping that we can take care of business and build confidence but we need to stay focus on the task ahead. One day and One game at a time.

Nice win. Let the players celebrate but lets get focus on Grambling.

Comment by cdmoore25 09.02.07 @ 11:52 am

Stuart,

CSTV didn’t show the game live just the pregame show and post game DW press conference live. It cost $7.95/month and since you can listen to the radio over the internet it isn’t worth subscribing.

Comment by TMG Panther 09.02.07 @ 12:29 pm

Why the doom and gloom????? As long as Stull’s thumb is OK in a week or two. The OL still has another week to jell. Pitt has not unvailed Mo yet and he is star waiting to happen. Pitt will be just fine this week.

Comment by joel 09.02.07 @ 12:38 pm

Ooops meant this year!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment by joel 09.02.07 @ 12:40 pm

cdmoore–I agree with you completely. I was just attempting a “snapshot in time” of how the season would look should nothing change from yesterday (which I know for sure won’t be the case). I think this Pitt team should improve dramatically over the course of the season as talent gains experience. I also think that Louisville and West Virginia have little room for upward improvement because they are already so very very strong. I also recognize that from week to week teams play either better or worse than their typical (average) level and that when a very good team’s bad day and a weaker team’s best day coincide upsets can and do happen. Like Michigan (Sagarin’s #7) losing to Appalachian State (Sagarin’s #80) in a game that, ordinarily, Michigan should have won (per Sagarin) by ~25.

Comment by Pitt1972 09.02.07 @ 12:45 pm

A further note on Appalachian State–and why Michigan should not have been overlooking them–Last season they finished as Sagarin’s #53 team and, 1AA or not, they were ranked higher by Sagarin at the end of 2006 than any team in the MAC (and a couple of BE teams). Plus, they were 14-1 and accustomed to winning. Surely, not a team to take lightly which it seems Michigan did and paid the price.

Comment by Pitt1972 09.02.07 @ 12:56 pm

Just back from the game. We played such a conservative game plan that I can’t draw anything from last night except this, SHADY is going to kick ass! MCCOY is the real deal and needs to get the as many carries as he can. He was running when EM knew we going to run the ball and he was getting everything and more from each carry. I don’t want to take anything away from LSH but he is to small to bust it up inside and needs to be used on screens and short passes across the middle that give him a little space where he can then get the most out of his speed. Just my thoughts but I am hoping to see more of Shady that kid is special.

Comment by Tony In Harrisburg 09.02.07 @ 1:09 pm

It’s time to break out Bostick as the QB. Bag the redshirt, he’ll have three years left and we can always get another QB. Stull will be lost for most, if not all, of the season. Let Bostic play; he’s more accurate. And give McCoy the ball. No time to be politically correct. No time to pussy-foot around. Let’s salvage the season.

Comment by The Kose 09.02.07 @ 1:56 pm

OK… Now that Stull is out indefinitely with a torn thumb ligament (ouch, who do you think should start next week against Grambling – Smith or Bostick? My vote right now is for Pitt to start Smith, but be prepared to have Bostick just as prepared to take over should it become necessary.

Comment by Nick A. 09.02.07 @ 1:56 pm

Smith is the best athlete of the three and has the strongest arm. This could be a good thing for Pitt long-term.

Comment by Omar 09.02.07 @ 2:19 pm

Man, that sucks.

Comment by Jeff 09.02.07 @ 2:28 pm

Don’t forget how many times Stull was out of the pocket yesterday. I only was able to listen, but sounded like he was under enough pressure that he needed to move quite a bit. Bostick is not a mobile quarterback. If our line can’t hold a pocket, Bostick will get killed. I’m not saying he shouldn’t be the replacement, but keep that in mind. I do believe he has the ability to receive the ball from the center, so that is a plus.

Comment by Jon C 09.02.07 @ 2:58 pm

We are really going to have to ride LSH, Shady, Sugar Shane, and Conredge. We now only have 2 scholarship QB’s. One is a RS freshman and the other is a true freshman.

I just went from being optimistic to not so much. Virginia and MSU are looking a lot tougher right now than they did a week ago.

Comment by Jon in NOVA 09.02.07 @ 3:12 pm

This injury really hurts. I thought Stull looked really good last night. I know it was only EMU but he made good decisions, and stayed away from the major mistakes. Hopefully he can get back soon. It sucks it was his throwing hand!! Now we need the other QBs to step it up!

Comment by Matt D 09.02.07 @ 3:22 pm

Of course we should celebrate this win. This team has great potential and will “eventually” win a big one. You have to realize though that Smith was a train wreck last night. The snap and the extra point should be automatic without question. He had issues with snapping the ball in camp and it looks like he is still having problems.

Smith should get the start against Grambling though but we can’t ride on his mistakes. Unfortunately Bostick will have to play unless there is a walk on that Wanny has been holding back the praises on. Anyone know how good Steve Malinchak is? I see him on the roster and shows he is a redshirt Freshman walk on.

This makes you appreciate Tyler Palko that much more. It appears were going to be running against Grambling a mess load(this could be a good thing though). Smith should be fine if he can just wipe the butter off his fingers.

Comment by Panthoor 09.02.07 @ 3:39 pm

Those kids from EMU are thugs.

Comment by Eric R 09.02.07 @ 4:27 pm

Let’s not forget that Pat Bostick left campus for a ‘reason’ the day before training camp.

Whether or not there’s a positive relationship between his “personal issues” and rumors of “panic-attack,” it’s certain that the kid was ‘homesick’ and under a great deal of pressure to “perform.”

So regardless of what we (as fans) want to see (or feel should happen) as a result of Stull’s injury, who’s to say that Bostick himself thinks/feels he’s anymore prepared/ready to set foot on the field as “leader” of this football team?

Kevan Smith will definitely be starting against Grambling, and I should think that if he has any measure of success, he’ll remain the starter until Stull returns, if at all.

Of course, if Smith were to go down or perform with unquestioning incompetence, Bostick might be more inclined to take on the challenge as starter-under-center. (As earlier expressed, the expectation that he’d immediately compete for the job was an unfair burden to place on a freshman, presumably manifesting itself in his discomfort and “personal problems.”)

My point: ‘if’ PB is thrown onto the field sooner v. later, he’ll need to be in a more forgiving position (QB by default) than when he entered as “front-runner.” IMO, it’ll have to unfold like that before we see Pat Bostick as quarterback.

Comment by Neil 09.02.07 @ 4:49 pm

…Much like Panthoor put it above — didn’t see your comment until after finishing my perspective (about half way through today’s earlier posts).

Great win, and great play by Stull. Hope we see him return to the lineup before MSU.

Comment by Neil 09.02.07 @ 4:58 pm

How long does it take for a torn ligament to heal? I can’t imagine there is any way he’ll be back for MSU. How many weeks are we talking about, if at all this season?

Comment by Stuart 09.02.07 @ 6:31 pm

I think their preference is to redshirt Bostick so if I were Wannstedt, I would start Smith until he falters, whether that comes against Grambling or Michigan State or whoever. Since they burn Bostick’s redshirt the first time he steps on the Heinz Field turf to enter a game, they might as well see what Smith can do first. If Smith can’t manage this team against Grambling, he has no friggin’ business being out there for the rest of the season. This will be as easy as it gets for Pitt all year.

The second they decide to make the switch, though, Bostick better take the rest of the snaps the rest of the year. If they’re going to burn his redshirt, they might as well get everything they can out of it.

Like I said, my first preference would be to try to retain Bostick’s redshirt and only use him if absolutely necessary. If Smith can’t get it done against Grambling, he sure as hell isn’t going to get it done against anyone else on the schedule.

Comment by Stoosh 09.02.07 @ 6:37 pm

So i looked more into this, turns out this is the same thing that happened to Brian Brohm last year, and he missed 3 games (little less than a month). So if he had surgery today (Brohm had it the next day) and heals the same, he should be back for Virginia Sept 29th, or Navy at the lastest. If he heals slowly, Cincinnati or Louisville at the latest. He’ll get at least 5 more starts this year.

No chance he’s playing Grambling, MSU or UConn.

Comment by Stuart 09.02.07 @ 6:52 pm

I guess a win is a win but I think we’re in for some growing pains again this season. I dont think it matters who the QB is when you have such a bad O-line. I guess we’ll have to wait and see how things play out.

Comment by Rex 09.02.07 @ 7:01 pm

Stuart,

This presents quite the conundrum. As I said above, they likely don’t need Bostick to beat Grambling and if they do, the problems with these team may exist well beyond the QB position.

Would it make sense to burn Bostick’s redshirt for what could ultimately amount to two games – Michigan State and UConn? What if Stull comes back quickly and retakes the starting job for the Virginia game, thus relegating Bostick back to the bench? What if Bostick stays there?

Well, I think this team was going to have a hard time with Michigan State, so I’m not sure it matters who is taking the snaps. The big game then becomes UConn – a home game and an in-conf. game they can ill afford to lose if they want to make a bowl game this year. Can Bostick make a difference there, even though there’s a chance Stull may come back the following week and send Bostick back to the bench potentially for the rest of the year?

If beating UConn ultimately helps them into a bowl game, then I say burning Bostick’s redshirt was well worth it.

Comment by Stoosh 09.02.07 @ 7:07 pm

Who knows…i hope they announce a timetable for his return soon… Some players (mostly baseball) are out 3 months with this. Ron Artest came back in 2 weeks. I guess it depends on the severity of the injury. The only QB that I found was Brohm, although I’m sure there have been others.

So, he could be back for 8 games, or he may be medically redshirting, or anything inbetween.

I guess you start Smith, and if he sucks, put in Bostick.

The best outcome of course is Bostick is so amazing when Stull comes back we’re not sure if we even want him to be the starter. Not that this’ll happen.

But it could be worse I guess…we could be Michigan.

Comment by Stuart 09.02.07 @ 7:42 pm

Where’s that POS Joe Flacco when you need him?

Comment by ChrisA 09.02.07 @ 7:50 pm

Listen if we are pissed about this wonder how Michigan feels. Not to mention Texas who only by 8 to Ark St. Listen its the first game and we dominated defensively the lowest amount of yards givin since like 89 in an opener. Another thing if App. St. is D1-A then they are in the top 25. And they beat a lot of other 1A teams. I think they could win every conference outside of the power 6. They would have beat a lot of other teams yesterday based on the way most top 25 teams performed.

Comment by Rob 09.02.07 @ 8:15 pm

How long does it take for a torn ligament to heal? I can’t imagine there is any way he’ll be back for MSU. ”

I don’t know the exact extent of the injury, but having torn ligaments (foot) in my early teens, it’s knowingly not unusual for younger folks to heal a lot faster than those fully developed. (No sh*t, I was back maybe 85% 3 weeks prior to what I’d initially been told.)

Even if I’m off a bit, ligaments are typically a 6-12 week process. (Incidentally, is there a doctor among us to certify what-is-is-not avg. recovery?) So I’m not pretending to know how youth will translate for Stull — as a red-shirt junior you’d think he’s about as mature (physically) as any other player at this level.
I nevertheless don’t think it’s entirely improbable to conceive him back 2-3 weeks from now, given that A) his injured thumb won’t affect his mobility (esp. given the recent performance of the OL) and B) the fact that our offense is reportedly QB friendly; incorporating mostly short pass options in a pro-style WCO.

Seemingly, the ability to scramble out of the pocket outweighs the ability to toss a palko-like 41 yard completion. So even if Stull can only be effective 10-15 yards from the LOS, I think he’ll play — bad thumb and all — so long as his pain doesn’t require an ongoing script for pain-valid narcotics.

Comment by Neil 09.02.07 @ 9:23 pm

It doesn’t help Pitt’s cause that the only team EMU could have conceivably beat yesterday would have been Duke. I don’t take anything from this game except how bad the run blocking was and how much penetration I saw through the OLine. And then, perhaps, another patented Wanny excuse for why this team won’t go bowling this season. Two years ago, it was the old players. Last year, the new players had to redshirt. And this season, it’s because the players here now are too young. Ted Roof is trotting out the “youth” excuse at Duke again, and this time no one is buying it. I wonder how long Pitt fans will continue to buy the crap the AD and administration are feeding us.

Comment by Joshua 09.02.07 @ 9:25 pm

Just read that Palko got cut but that he is a “strong candidate” for the practice squad if he clears waivers, particularly b/c the Saints only have one backup QB. The killer graf:

“Palko was the Saints’ third quarterback until the final day of the preseason, but turned in a dismal performance, including mishandling three snaps, during the second half of New Orleans’ final preseason game — a 7-0 victory over Miami on Thursday night.”

Comment by Carmen 09.02.07 @ 9:50 pm

Joshua–IMO you are totally wrong that Pitt played “one of the worst teams in clollege football.” Yes, EMU is not a powerhouse. But, there are about 100 teams worse in Sagarin’s ratings (See USA Today online). EMU is not nearly as bad a team as you believe, especially on defense, they held a lot of their opponents last year to under 20 points. They would likely beat at least 3 teams our BE brethern played the last few days(Buffalo, Murray State and SW Missouri State–the latter 2 probably by 20 or more). They are about the same strength wise as either Duke or Western Michigan and would have a shot at beating either of these teams.

Comment by Pitt1972 09.02.07 @ 11:01 pm

Starting to look like this staff should have recruited one more QB or brought in a juke (such as we did with Turman) to have a better insurance policy. Yet we recruited just-how-many-again tailbacks and KR/CB types?

For one of the first times in my existence I don’t really have an opinion. I was very, very disappointed in the OL play yesterday, and if it were to continue in this fashion, this team will be lucky to win 3 more games, and I mean lucky. Absolutely none on the road, and only Grambling and Syracuse will be likely others. UConn, one that I eagerly anticipated for the revenge factor, suddenly looks dubious. Cincy has developed a good D that looks like it will shove our heads into the Heinz Field mud based on this performance. USF will have their front 7 in the backfield before the handoff is completed.

However, I fully realize that’s somewhat unfair after one game against an opponent so bad that perhaps the team was unmotivated. Hard to imagine that in the FIRST game of the season, but then again, look at Michigan. This is the danger of playing garbage teams.

The DL showed a little more, especially the interior, but they merely did more than hold their own. The DEs were totally ineffective. And I don’t know if I remember a more nondescript core of LBs. Dickerson looked totally worthless, like he’d rather be playing any other position. What a absolute shame to have wasted a talent like that. The safeties were as invisible as last year. About the best we have are the corners, even with Revis gone.

Again, not saying there isn’t some improvement here and there, maybe drastically so on the DL, but not enough, and without playmakers like Palko, Kinder, Revis and Blades, the net result is worse.

This all said, looking at a probable 3 win disaster season, why waste Bostick’s redshirt? Run Smith out there until Stull returns, if he does. Have a walk-on QB ready in case of another injury, God forbid. Hope the TB’s can make some things happen on their own, much like the mid-nineties when Curtis Martin and Billy West often had to do just that.

I had been very pessimistic about this season after, well, the UCOnn game last year. Little by little I gained some optimism reading some of the Gorman blogs and Zeise columns. They seemed very positive. But I realize now that they were too close to the situation day in and day out, and lost their perspective (how these guys would fare against other, really good programs).

The worst thing about all this is the OL certainly won’t be good enough next year, either. Guys like Jacobson and Nix and Matha definitely will be upgrades but not ready to step right in. Particularly considering how poor Dunn has done with the current group, who up and down were not absolute zeroes themselves as prospects (particularly Pinkston and Thomas), and guys like Otah and McGlynn who had experience.

Again, tremendous disappointment. The product is just so vanilla. I never expected greatness, not even by year 3, but I expected far, far more than we’re seeing.

Comment by geeman2001 09.02.07 @ 11:29 pm

Joshua,

I think the score is deceiving in a few ways. First, the defense was fairly dominant yesterday. That’s already been outlined above. The defense dominated EMU in just about every way any reasonable Pitt fan could’ve expected.

Second, the dynamic of the game changed when Stull went down. They had an 18-point lead against a team that was having trouble generating any sort of offense when Stull went down. The last thing they needed at that point was to bring in an unproven true freshman and ask him to start slinging the ball all over the place. An INT at that point could easily change the momentum of the game.

Keep this in mind, too. Wannstedt has said he wants to make this into a power running, clock controlling team. Pitt got conservative – very much like the Steelers used to do – and it paid off as they began to wear EMU down and establish a bit of running game through the fourth quarter. This is the power running team that Wannstedt wants, and those kinds of teams are often not conducive to generating blowouts when they control the tempo of the game.

Third, I believe they had two fourth-quarter drives that took them into the red zone and all they got were field goals. They convert just one of those into a touchdown and this is a 31-point win. They convert both and it’s a 38-point win. I’m not sure either of those outcomes really changes the way anyone feels about it though. To turn those field goals into touchdowns would’ve only required an additional 35-40 yards of offense from Pitt.

I’m not sure what more you could ask for. Pitt was easily three touchdowns better than Eastern Michigan yesterday. They covered the spread. The defense dominated EMU’s offense. And the offense was methodical, as most ball-control offenses should be.

Comment by Stoosh 09.02.07 @ 11:47 pm

Wow…Beano Cook is on KDKA Sunday Sports Showdown and he just said he expects Penn State to play for the national championship. He says he thinks they’ll beat Michigan and then run the table through the rest of the Big Ten schedule.

All this from a beatdown of Florida International, who had no business being on the field with Penn State yesterday.

Comment by Stoosh 09.02.07 @ 11:51 pm

HOLY F’N SHIT…ALL OF YOU!!! What the hell is your problem? At least let them lose an f’n game before you completely throw away the season. I’m usually the first to go negative but I at least wait for a loss. The D had their best opener since 89 and yes EMU sucks but so has every other opener we have had since then. The fact we stopped anyone, and I mean anyone, from running the ball is an improvement. No sacks, that’s good no matter who we are playing. Remember, we sat on the ball almost the whole second half….played conservative, especially when Stull went out. Sorry they didn’t score enough for you fans. You should demand a written apology from the coaches and players. At least give them a chance. This is what tune up games are for.

Comment by Jon C 09.03.07 @ 12:22 am

Didn’t FIU go 0-11 last year?

Comment by ryan 09.03.07 @ 12:26 am

Sorry, don’t buy it. You can’t tell me that a team like EMU could hold Pitt to 3-and-out on Pitt’s first two drives. A team like Cinci would have taken advantage of those early 3-and-outs, and EMU was a dropped pass away from changing the whole dynamic of the game.

That being said, running LSH on 3rd down UP THE MIDDLE was extremely stupid. It just seems like the running-game stats were also deceptive, as most of that yardage seemed to have been accumulated in the 4th quarter. I think at a certain point late in the 3rd quarter EMU had more rushing yards than Pitt did. Given that EMU still sucks (and I still believe them to be one of the worst D-IA teams, along with Duke), I think that a team with greater stamina (ie.: all the other BCS-conference teams) would have kept the rushing stats down, taking away the pass as the front 4 would have been enough to manhandle the run.

Comment by Joshua 09.03.07 @ 1:35 am

Hmmm…

I see MSU as a loss.

Virginia is a tossup. Rutgers probably still a loss. After seeing USF let 1AA Elon stay in that game, I think we might be able to take them.

Comment by Jimbo Covert's my dad 09.03.07 @ 1:41 am

Virginia got crushed by Wyoming yesterday. They totaled 110 yards. against Wyoming. That game better not be a tossup. They might be worse than EMU

How is that game still a tossup while you think we have better chance at USF after Saturday?

Comment by Jamie H 09.03.07 @ 3:40 am

I agree that the safeties weren’t very involved – they didn’t need to be. The D line and Scott McKillop pretty much cleaned out everything that went up the middle.

I also think that the game plan – while Cavanaugh did one of his better coaching schemes – was pretty vanilla, though there was a lot of motions with the tight ends to get mismatches against cornerbacks that will pay off in the future. The EMU D stacked 9 in the box the whole game and we never attempted to make them pay deep (hopefully not because we couldn’t). We used the tight ends well to keep the ball moving when the running game was stuffed. Once Stull game out the offense got as diverse as Vince Lombardi would have been.

Comment by Kevin 09.03.07 @ 8:37 am

Sorry guys, I call it like I saw it (and I was actually sober for this one … unfortunately). As I said, I had gone into the stadium in a very positive state. I left far less positive, and it had little to do with Stull’s injury.

Forget a 24 point margin. I agree, who really would have cared if it was 38-3 (as it could have been) or 27-7 (as it should have been). It was the nature of the play that matters. And the OL was atrocious.

This looked just like it is: A team that is a little better than a 1-11 team from the depths of the MAC. I’m sorry to have annoyed some of you here, but that’s not good enough after 3 years.

I’ve seen a lot of people ripping into Al Groh on several sites the last couple days (and rightfully so). I just hope those folks take a long look into the mirror.

Comment by geeman2001 09.03.07 @ 10:57 am

I watched the Wyoming-UVA game and the Cowboys were running at will, with clearly inferior talent compared to us on their O-line and particularly at RB. Plus, UVA suffered from some of the worst play calling I have seen outside of high school football. It looks like those who thought this would be Al Grolh’s year are sorely mistaken. Unless UVA improves vastly over the next month, we have no excuse not to win that game.

Comment by Greg in Columbia 09.03.07 @ 10:57 am

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter