masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
December 29, 2010

Pitt sits at 12-1 overall and 1-0 in Big East play. The team is ranked #6 and will probably move up a spot next week. The team just came off of a strong team performance against the Kemba Walker Huskies that reminded everyone that Pitt hasn’t gone away. Despite all the accolades to the surprise teams, players and where the attention is in the conference — Pitt is on top and quietly worrying every other team.

So everyone is feeling good about Pitt and the players. There’s no one star or standout, other than by default.

There are discussions and debates over who stirs the drink on this team. Is it Wanamaker? Gibbs? Will it still be Brown by the end of the year as believed it might be back in the preseason? Is Nas the glue guy on this team, even though, the team played well without him when he was hurt. Maybe it’s Woodall? Does this team even need one when all the starters and most of the bench already seem comfortable with their roles and the teammates? Honestly, I don’t know the answer right now. Right now I would be comfortable seeing Gibbs, Wanamaker, Woodall or Brown take the final shot in a game. Guys like Robinson and McGhee seem to be players that keep the team together. Wanamaker probably is the vocal leader, while Gibbs has gotten louder in directing things.

I think many fans are still struggling — despite it being the second straight year — with the fact that while Pitt is balanced, it is stronger in the backcourt. There was a comfort with the power inside with Troutman, Taft, Gray, Kendall, Young and Blair. Yeah there was the point guard to direct and another guard to try and stretch the defense with shots outside. But the offense went inside.

Now, the guards penetrate. The offense goes to and through them. The frontcourt gets work, but it seems to be more on clean-up or if there was nothing for the guards. This has been working out well for Gary McGhee — who showed some nice touch in the game — but has been steady inside.

These may be minor details — McGhee’s 11 points weren’t even the margin of Pitt’s victory — but this should not to be overlooked; McGhee’s offensive contributions will be paramount when shots aren’t falling from the outside, and his ability to control the interior will push opposing offenses farther outside.

Much has been written and discussed about the improvement of McGhee, who went from Blair’s benchwarmer to possible transfer to solid contributor. But he’s now showcasing his strength, and while McGhee will never be Blair in terms of offensive ability, he is slowly proving he’s an option in a Pitt attack than is increasingly showing its endless possibilities.

Nasir Robinson gets some well-deserved love. After missing some early games because of injuries, he came back. But Coach Dixon had him coming off the bench. A move I liked because Robinson is an energy guy and it seemed like a good option to have him jump in after the game is underway and change the dynamic on opposing teams. But, then, I’m not the coach and Robinson got back to being the starter against UConn.

Coming off the bench, Robinson averaged 6.6 points and 5.5 rebounds before Pitt coach Jamie Dixon told him last week that he would regain a starter’s role.

“It gave me a lot of confidence” Robinson said. “I went hard in practice, and it worked out. It really didn’t matter (who started). I just wanted to come out and play my game.”

Posting a double-double and despite being an undersized power forward, dominated inside. It also supports what Coach Dixon has always said, that how the kids do in practice determines how and when they play.

To that end, J.J. Moore got some minutes against UConn and had an impact. What he didn’t do, though, was take a single shot. You could see that he wanted to. A couple times, he looked so poised to try and force the issue. But he has started to learn the lesson. You earn the playing time by being part of the team. By making the pass and most importantly — playing defense.

It was a very encouraging sight for a guy who has gotten in games at times this season and brought back unfortunate memories of Keith Benjamin’s first couple of years.  Trying to score right away, and launching shots. Being careless and not playing with the rest of the team. Moore may be the most talented in this freshman class, but he is showing that he does listen and can be coached.

Dave Telep at ESPN.com throws some more love at Coach Dixon (Insider subs) the coach and the evaluator:

How does Pittsburgh coach Jamie Dixon celebrate his win over UConn? He goes to Myrtle Beach to go recruiting, of course. Pittsburgh and Dixon’s recruiting is a fascinating study of evaluation of players and their subsequent “fit” in the Pittsburgh program. Dixon always seems to wind up with a litany of players who come to Pitt with a chip on their shoulder and that’s the way Dixon likes his recruits.

If you play for the Panthers, there’s a good chance that at the end of your four years you’ll have maxed out your abilities, played in four NCAA Tournaments and didn’t entertain transferring.

“Kids like our place. They like the campus, how we treat them and how we play,” Dixon said.

We’ll throw this one out there: Dixon is the next generation Gary Williams. His teams win and his players improve. It’s a simple formula: coach them up and keep them happy and it’s worked for Dixon. There’s really no need to chase the uber-talented, pampered high school super star. Dixon seems to prefer guys who can be coached, want to be coached and see themselves as winners. Dixon has mastered the art of evaluation and integration with his brand.

How many Big East offers you think Bradley Wannamaker entertained? None, and now every time he steps onto the court don’t think for a second that doesn’t fuel him. Nasty and motivated, the Pittsburgh way. Pittsburgh’s other recruit at Wannamaker’s position that year: Virginia Tech’s Malcolm Delaney. Dixon was in position to strengthen his team with either one of those guys.

No. I’m not sure who Dixon was watching in particular. The Beach Ball Classic is in Myrtle Beach right now, and has teams from all over the country are in it.

As Khem Birch’s signing, along with plenty of other recent signees with talent and high major pursuit — Cameron Wright, Dante Taylor, J.J. Moore, Blair, etc.  — it isn’t the talent that Dixon shies away from. It has to do with their ability/willingness to be coached and to play within a certain framework. Coach Dixon has shown a willingness to adapt his system to the players strengths and weaknesses, but he expects them to be willing to work as well.

The Gary Williams comparison is fair. Forget the last five years at Maryland. Maryland’s recruiting sagged after the loss of some longtime assistants. Williams essentially missed on his assistant hires and that has been something they have been slow to overcome. But in the years before that — especially from1994 to 2005. Williams had his Terrapins team always in the ACC hunt. Always in the top-25. Building to more each year, and yet not loaded with the 5-star talent. There was talent and McDonald’s All-Americans. But it wasn’t anything like what Duke or UNC had. Pitt under Coach Dixon is doing similar things.





OK, we need a GTG? Here it is:

.50 Wanamaker + .50 Gibbs = 1.00 GTG

Name is Gibbsamaker. Argument over.

Comment by steve 12.29.10 @ 5:05 pm

Gibbs is a gtg. 13-1 i thought

Comment by Tony Cancilla 12.29.10 @ 5:31 pm

Wannamaker had other big east offers. that is a lie. he was the philly catholic league player of the year. the writer shouldn’t make stuff up in attempt to have a more compelling story.

Comment by Omar 12.29.10 @ 5:56 pm

If you look up the definition of team in the dictionary, you’ll see the Pitt logo. Seriously, though. Jamie builds teams. It always amazes me how unselfish they are on both ends of the floor, making the extra pass, helping on defense, and doing whatever it takes to win. I think each one of Jamie’s teams has been special in its own way. This team has tremendous chemistry, respect for each other, and respect for the game. I hope it serves them well in the months to come and lands at the final four in april.

Comment by Scott 12.29.10 @ 6:51 pm

I think Nasir has returned to game shape just in time .. it is obvious that Talib neeeds much seasoning.

Along those lines … I can see Dante, Travon and JJ (Moore) stepping up to key starting roles next year to abet Gibbs and (hopefully) Birch with much support from Nasir and Talib and a few others.

Comment by wbb 12.29.10 @ 6:58 pm

Like the Gary Williams analogy. Maybe we can win a national championship the same way.

Comment by Scott 12.29.10 @ 7:02 pm

here is another good basketball vibe

link to blog.mysanantonio.com

Comment by wbb 12.29.10 @ 7:29 pm

There goes the Hoya’s #1 ranking in fg %

Comment by steve 12.29.10 @ 7:50 pm

SJ up by 6 over WVU at the half

Comment by steve 12.29.10 @ 7:55 pm

The Big East is going to beat up on each other. We’re all cannibal children and it feels good this way. There will be no undefeated teams in this conference.

Comment by Panthoor 12.29.10 @ 8:31 pm

Gtown is going down.

Comment by Scott 12.29.10 @ 8:44 pm

Bad week for the ‘eers too

Comment by steve 12.29.10 @ 8:50 pm

The WVU game is like in slo mo. All tushes are dragging. Deep benches will beat either team.

Comment by steve 12.29.10 @ 8:53 pm

How much money will a team get if they win the Premiership?

Comment by hyip investment 12.29.10 @ 11:29 pm

Would be very comfortable with either Gibbs or Brad taking the last shot. Both have proven they can hit it.

Hopefully, this year’s providence game won’t come down to a last minute shot like it did last year.

Anyone have a theory as to why a very pedestrian team like the Friars gives Pitt so much trouble? Will having Skerry on th ePitt bench help this year?

Comment by Boubacar Aw 12.30.10 @ 10:58 am

Thought Nasir played great vs. Uconn. The best Ive seen him play. Seems to be that “glue” piece every successful team needs. A player that Coach Dixon has trouble taking off the floor cause he does so many things right. He seems to understand both the offensive and defensive assignments of everyone. He rebounds, he hustles, and he doesnt mind if all he does is set good screens. Getting that little bit of extra offense out of him this year is going to be a huge plus.

Comment by Z-Boy 12.30.10 @ 10:59 am

Games like Providence are classic trap games. It’s easy to forget that (except for DePaul) there are no easy outs in this conference. Just look at what the Johnnies did to the Hoopies in Morgantown last night. The minute you overlook a team and let them think they can beat you they do. It seems that’s what’s happened with us and the Friars lately.

Comment by Scott 12.30.10 @ 11:10 am

Brad was a highly ranked out of Philly and had offers from a bunch of schools, including Villanova.

Brad Wannamaker was the best Pitt player on the floor in our two most recent losses (UT and Xavier)…no doubt about it. Gotta give him props for that.

He has grown on me over the years. He still has absolutely terrible stretches within games, but he is undeniably a guy that makes plays for this team when they need them.

Comment by Pauly P 12.30.10 @ 2:50 pm

The idea that Pitt’s players were not heavily recruited by other schools is ludicrous. They may not have a team of “stars”, but every player in the top-9 rotation received multiple offers from BCS conference schools, including other Big East schools.

Comment by Pantherman13 12.30.10 @ 3:38 pm

Wanny has an extremely high basketball IQ. Two years ago I never would have said that. I was a big detractor but he’s proven me wrong. He’s grown into a very good college player. Certainly no star, but a guy who knows how to win.

Comment by Scott 12.30.10 @ 3:53 pm

According to the Pitt Media guide Wannmaker was the 88th ranked player by Rivals.com coming out High School his year..he had 13 offers including Villinova, Xavier, Virginia, PSU, Rutgers, VT, Dayton George Washingtopn and Temple.

Comment by milo bloom 12.30.10 @ 5:43 pm

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter