masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
March 24, 2009

Least of all, Sean Miller.

“In terms of this NCAA Tournament, the focus is really on our players and our team, for us to be back in the Sweet 16,” Miller said. “That’s the story of this game. That’s really where the focus should be.”

But Miller, who starred at Blackhawk under his father John Miller and was recruited to Pitt by John Calipari, admitted he will never forget his days in Oakland.

“I had a great experience,” he said. “I was treated like you would want to be treated. The friendships that I have today, so many of my close friends really stem from that four-and five-year experience there.”

Then he turned the attention back to his Atlantic 10 regular-season champion.

“And it really stops there as well,” he said.

Ah, would that it were that simple. If it were, everytime a job on the west coast opened up, Coach Jamie Dixon’s name wouldn’t be bandied about. This is a storyline. A dramatic point to pound at until fingers are bloodied because no one can really hit the nail when no one wants to talk about it.

While the Panthers are the top seeds in the East, facing No. 1 seeds is nothing new to Xavier. This is the third straight year that the Musketeers have faced the top seed in the tournament.

“We’re just looking at it as a great opportunity to make another big stamp on our season and the program,” senior C.J. Anderson said.

“Everyone has seen a lot of Pitt and is familiar with the players and their program.” Anderson added.

For the record they lost both of those prior meetings with a #1 seed.

Coach Dixon figured he’d speak to a Big East coach in Cinci coach Mick Cronin about Xavier. He’s expecting a good game.

“It’s going to be a great game,” Cronin said. “I really think Xavier matches up well. They’re physical, they rebound and they defend. A lower-scoring game is going to favor Xavier.”

From Cronin’s vantage point, the Musketeers’ strength is their defense, which he calls the best he’s seen from an XU team under Sean Miller.

“They’re very consistent with their defense,” Cronin said. “They’re athletic. They have size and strength, and their depth allows them to keep fresh bodies on the floor and helps them maintain their defensive intensity.”

Of the three, Blair, the Big East co-player of the year, presents the most difficult matchup.

“He’s relentless,” Cronin said. “There’s no other way to describe it. It’s hard to keep him down for 40 minutes. When the game is on the line he’ll find a way against four guys to grab the ball and put it in.”

One thing in the Musketeers’ favor, Cronin said, is that they have 10 fouls to give in 6-foot-9, 255-pound Jason Love and 7-foot, 265-pound Kenny Frease.

And Cronin believes that XU is strong enough up front to hold its own on the boards against the Panthers.

“I think this is the best rebounding team Xavier has had in a long time,” Cronin said. “That’s how they beat us. That’s an area where they can definitely compete with Pittsburgh. That’s important because Pitt has had games where they don’t shoot the ball well but they dominate you on the glass.”

He also thinks their guard-foward B.J. Raymond is going to have to have a big game for Xavier to win.

Of course, Sean Miller has an A-10 coach that is quite familiar with Pitt in Duquesne’s Ron Everhart. Unlike Cronin who feels a low scoring game favors Xavier, Everhart feels differently.

“If they can make it an up-and-down game and force Pitt to constantly play transition defense, it’s the only time (Pitt center DeJuan) Blair and any of their guys are vulnerable,” Everhart said Tuesday. “The more possessions they have, there will be more fouls called, more trips to the line, more action — more chance to get a team that relies heavily on four to five guys into foul trouble.”

Everhart, one of four coaches to oppose both teams this season and the only one of that group to beat either, is convinced Xavier’s size, shot-blocking ability and outside shooting could prove troublesome to Pitt.

“Xavier might have an edge in depth on Pitt, but it doesn’t have an experienced senior point guard who has played through four NCAA tournaments like Levance Fields,” Everhart said. “He distributes the ball and gets guys shots, and teams that traditionally win national championships are built like Pitt. They have multiple seniors, one of whom is a point guard, and they know how to win close games.”

Then he said this about getting to coach against your alma mater.

Everhart coached last week against his own alma mater, Virginia Tech, in the NIT, and he believes there is something about going against your own school that can’t be quantified or analyzed.

“Maybe you prepare with a little more intensity, you’re sharper and more organized — you want your guys to be prepared to play your alma mater,” Everhart said. “For whatever reason, it does mean something. But Jamie (Dixon, Pitt’s coach) always has his guys ready to play, and I’m sure he’ll coach this week with a little bit of an edge, too.”

For the record, Duquesne lost to VT in OT. I could live with that as Xavier and Miller’s fate.

So what do we have. A coach that favors slow, plodding games things such a thing favors Xavier. Another coach that likes up-tempo sees that as helping Xavier. Thanks guys. Glad the two of you could help clear that up.

It isn’t surprising, though, that Pitt is favored and most are picking Pitt for this game. Of course, the Pitt players swear they are focused on just the game in front of them and getting past that barrier.

Pitt, which has never beaten higher than a No. 6 seed in the NCAA tournament the past seven seasons, has been ranked at the top of the polls and is one of the favorites to win the national championship, but the Panthers know all too well how those dreams can die well before the Final Four. Pitt players are determined that the Sweet 16 won’t be another Groundhog’s Day for the program.

“All we’re focused on is the next opponent,” senior forward Sam Young said. “That’s the only thing on everyone’s mind. We’re not saying we’re going to get to a Final Four or win a national championship. We have learned from that.

“When I hear someone talking about the Final Four I stop them right there. We have to worry about the Sweet 16. We can’t worry about any other game. We have to worry about today’s game. If we don’t pay attention to who we’re playing now we might be watching the Final Four.”

The concern these days is not the offense, but the defense is not what it has been. But, it is not dead, yet.

But recent numbers — Sunday’s first half notwithstanding — point to a resurgence in Pitt’s perimeter defense. In the Panthers’ final regular-season game, Connecticut shot just 4 of 14 from 3-point range (28.6 percent). West Virginia duplicated that number in the Big East Tournament. Last Friday, East Tennessee State put a scare into the Panthers in the first round of the NCAA Tournament, but not from the arc; the Buccaneers were just 4 of 22 (18.2 percent) from the perimeter.

And in the second half Sunday, Oklahoma State was 2 of 12 (16.7 percent).

“In the second half, though, we were getting out with our hands up,” Brown said.

Take out the Cowboys’ first half, and opponents are shooting a mere 14 of 62 (22.5 percent) from 3-point range. Overall field goal percentage during that span, again subtracting the 17-of-27 performance of Oklahoma State in Sunday’s first half, is an impressive 36.3 percent (78 of 215), about 5 percent lower than opponents shot over the season.

Maybe the new anomaly was Sunday’s first half.

“I felt like we were playing (defense) pretty good in the first half,” Wanamaker said, “but in the second half we really contested their shots.”

Hot shooting hurt as well.

I’m going to make a prediction about the game. I expect something good from Brad Wanamaker. I know he’s had some bad games in recent weeks. I’m of the opinion that he has made great progress, but is at his worst when playing against teams that press on defense. His court vision and ball handling is just not there to handle defenders in too tight. He dribbles too far away from his body too often because he is looking to keep the option of driving to the basket available. It means having to corral the ball when trying to pull up for a shot or stopping the dribble.  I think against a team like Xavier that does play more of a half-court game, Wanamker will have some space and will be able to do some good things.





I remember Sean Miller. He had a 95% free throw shooting percentage. All he needed to do was make 1 of 2 free throws and we go to the NCAA tourney. Both shots are bricks. We go on to lose to Miami (their first year in the BE) in the BE tourney and lose to Florida at home in the NIT. I remember talking to a Miami Athletic Dept. Rep at the Marriot after the game. They had no plans staying beyond the game as they were sure that Pitt would beat them. Ahh, those were the days.

We did beat PSU that year in the NIT. I remember driving home in a snow storm after that game.

Comment by Yeti 03.25.09 @ 8:01 am

Wow, Ron Everheart couldn’t be more wrong. Xavier doesn’t have a point guard or anybody who is any good in transition, how the hell would a 94 foot game work to their benifit?

If Fields is able to push tempo then Pitt should do just that, Xavier can’t hang with us in transition.

Comment by Paul 03.25.09 @ 8:43 am

I don’t really feel there’s any particular problems with the offense other than some sloppy turnover issues. I’ve got no problem at all with Sam scoring a lot of points or how much playing time Gibbs is getting or anything like that. We generally look confident on offense and guys are hitting open shots, moving around, etc. And we’ve gotten much better at handling the press. Far fewer passes and more urgency to get into the half-court game. We still need to step in to passes, but we are scoring our points. What this team seriously needs to do, is play TWO halves of full-on intense defense. Not just one half of “pretty good” defense.

Comment by SilverPanther in NYC 03.25.09 @ 9:06 am

Agree that Pitt could push the ball some against Xavier, but Fields isn’t the PG you want for that type of play. Not his game.

Still have issues with Pitt’s offensive decision-making. They took too many threes in the 2nd half against OSU and forgot to pound it down inside where they had the advantage, and that led to OSU climbing back in the game.

Think everybody wishes they’d put a great full-game defensive effort together, but this team isn’t loaded with guys who excel on that side of the ball. It’s just not that type of squad.

Comment by hugh green 03.25.09 @ 9:22 am

Fields comes across as being very charismatic. (I haven’t met him.) I am going to miss him along with some of his “feeds” next year. His personality seems ideal as a go-between Young’s and Blair’s egos. From my perspective, I don’t think that Carl Krauser would have been a good fit on this team. Although, in my opinion, Carl was a great guard, I think that he would have added a third strong ego for which there would be no room.

Comment by BigGuy 03.25.09 @ 10:16 am

Disagree, Hugh. Fields has been an excellent PG in transition this year pushing the ball. He makes great decisions on the break always and gets the ball where it needs to go. This is actually something that has been lacking in the tournament, the fast breaking and getting the ball out and going. I think it may have something to do with Fields’s injury. If you recall the UCONN game at home, Pitt got a number of baskets in transition. This team can be great when Fields gets out and the athletes like Dixon, Wanamaker, Young, and Gil Brown who are built for fast-breaking can get out and run. This has been missing in the tournament. Maybe it is because teams hustle back on D more, maybe its because Fields injury, but either way, I see this game against Xavier as an opportunity to really get out an run on a team. Pitt gets labeled as a half-court team, because they are very efficient at this and they have a point guard that is often referred to as pudgy. But the truth is that in many of their best games they really get out and go. Fields is a great transition game PG, not as far as going end to end and finishing, but as far as getting the ball to the right guys to finish. I hope they run tomorrow.

Comment by Ontario Lett's Go Pitt 03.25.09 @ 10:23 am

“Fields is a great transition game PG, not as far as going end to end and finishing, but as far as getting the ball to the right guys to finish”

Ontario,I absolutely agree. That is his strength, but he is also quite capable of finishing (especially with his left hand layup).

Comment by BigGuy 03.25.09 @ 10:42 am

I think Fields is proven in both the transition and half-court game. While I believe I understand Hugh’s concern about his transition skills since he is not a greyhound by any means, I still would much rather see the ball in his hands than anyone else. Dixon and Young may be better finishers, but sometimes they force the action too much (like Wannamaker) where Fields just seems when to pass, finish or slow it down.

Comment by w bill 03.25.09 @ 11:56 am

I’m thinking that maybe Biggs may have a big night, with Xavier’s D perhaps focusing on Blair and/or Young, Biggs could get more open looks and/or weak-side rebounds.

Given Xavier’s size, think G. Brown and Wannamaker will need more playing time in this game, and hopefully both will step up. Brown settled for some jumpers in that second half against OSU when he should have been getting to the hoop. Not sure why he can’t understand he is much more effective going to the hoop. Confidence thing, I guess.

Comment by Carmen 03.25.09 @ 2:48 pm

Fields is outstanding in transition. He always makes the right play and either finishes himself or gets the ball to one of his finishers for an easy dunk. How many times do we have to see the alley-oop to Young or Brown! Sometimes I think that some of the people on this board are watching a different game then I am. The best part about Fields transition game is the fact that he doesn’t force it and only runs when it is there.

Comment by omar 03.25.09 @ 3:33 pm

The love Pitt fans have for Levance amuses me, sometimes. It leads us all to overlook his shortcomings. He’s a very tough player, but when we start praising his transition and fast break game, well then we’ve lost all objectivity.

Pitt hasn’t had speed at the PG position since Knight was here. Sure, Fields throws the occasional spectacular alley oop pass, and there’s no doubt I’d rather have the ball in his hands than anybody else’s on this squad in transition……..but none of that makes him a great transition or fast break PG. He just doesn’t have the wheels.

Several years of Krauser and Fields have forced us all to forget what it was like to have speed at that position. It’s awesome.

If Levance could motor, do you think Pitt would have struggled so much against presses for the past couple of years? Wouldn’t it have been nice to actually attack presses by hitting a PG in stride and watching him fly past a defense and get dunks for his wingmen? Wonder why folks think twice before pressing Flynn?

Not sure Pitt had the right team to take advantage of having a speedy PG this year, but I’m hoping we do have the right kind of horses in the future to play that way, at least when the opportunity presents itself.

Hey, I’m happy we have Fields. Just the thought of not having him next year makes me uncomfortable. I just want folks to be realistic about his skill set. Great passer, floor leader, wants to take the big shot……..love all that stuff. But don’t tell me he’s going to explode in transition; at that point, the love and admiration turns into homerism and sycophancy.

Comment by hugh green 03.25.09 @ 3:56 pm

hugh, I know what “homerism” is, but I must admit, I had to look up “sycophancy”

(Your post is a continuation of an interesting discussion.)

Comment by BigGuy 03.25.09 @ 4:05 pm

BTW, Xavier’s top player, C. J. Anderson, flunked out of Manhattan College. (He was their leading scorer when he flunked out.) What’s the story? Is Manhattan run by the Jesuits and Xavier by the Dominicans?

Comment by BigGuy 03.25.09 @ 4:15 pm

Correction: My post should read: “One of Xavier’s top players, C. J. Anderson…”

Comment by BigGuy 03.25.09 @ 4:19 pm

Did anyone say Levance was fast? no. We said he is a great PG in transition which is true. They have got out and run in several games and he knows where to get the ball. Like I said he isn’t going to run end to end and take the ball himself. But, shoot him an outlet pass coming near half court and he is great in the transition game. That’s not losing objectivity. Just because people chose not to put a negative spin on players doesn’t mean its homerism. Speed isn’t all that makes a great PG on the break. Watching games you should know the kid is excellent when he gets the ball on the break and our speed guys fly in and finish plays. No homerism, no objectivity, but not a overly negative Pitt fan either. Obviously Fields lacks things in his game, speed, jumping, defense, athleticism that other elite guards have, but he is a hell of a PG when he gets the ball on the brake.

Comment by Ontario Lett's Go Pitt 03.25.09 @ 4:46 pm

I like the theory of an internecine (now I’m looking for opportunities to throw in 50 cent words) conflict between competing catholic brotherhoods.

With the inquisition over and fights over who brews the best beer kind of old-hat, why not squabble over small forwards?

Comment by hugh green 03.25.09 @ 4:47 pm

Levance just broke the single season assists record at Pitt. Levance is outstanding and deserves all the praise he receives. He is a cerebral and pass-first point guard who knows exactly what he wants to do on the floor. Levance is an excellent point guard on the break. He knows exactly when to hit his cutters and always gets points out of a fast break. That makes him a great transition point guard. He isn’t Chris Paul. He is a mediocre defender which is, by far, his most important weakness. However, offensively he is without peer on a national level.

Comment by omar 03.25.09 @ 7:44 pm

He deserves a lot of praise, just not for being a “great” transition PG.

Also, the team you play on has just as much to do with successful assists as you do ; do you think the fact that Pitt was much better offensively this year maybe had something to do with setting that assist record?

Saying he is without offensive peers on a national level, is just, well, ridiculous. It’s too silly to respond to.

But I’ll be cheering for him as hard as anybody in the TD Banknorth Center tonight, and at least I’ll be able to see him clearly.

Comment by hugh green 03.26.09 @ 6:02 am

Do you think Ashton Gibbs or Travon Woodall would have broken the single season assists record? Fields is a finalist, again, for the Cousy award. Obviously his game is very well-respected by educated college basketball folks. He leads the country in assist to turnovers and the team is much, much better when he is on the floor. So tell me, Hugh, how many peers does he have offensively in the NCAA this year? Maybe one, Ty Lawson, and he can only play at top speed. If one makes him play a half-court game he is terrible. Fields can play at multiple speeds and doesn’t lose much. Head-to-head he beat Eric Maynor, another great point guard, a few years ago. Darren Collison is much better defensively, but I would take Fields on the other end to run a team. Who then Hugh? Who is better? Sherron Collins isn’t a point guard. Nic Wise isn’t a point guard. Jeremy Pargo isn’t a point guard and neither is AJ Price. Tell me who is a better point guard then Levance Fields.

Comment by omar 03.26.09 @ 8:31 am

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter