masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
October 23, 2008

Rutgers Defense Is Their Only Hope

Filed under: Football,Opponent(s) — Chas @ 1:05 pm

Do you remember back in September how frustrated we were over the offense struggling to score points? Rutgers has been absolutely miserable at it. The most points they have scored in a 1-A game was 21 versus Navy. In the past two games the offense has produced 20 points (the defense had a safety against UConn. In the six 1-A games the offense has produced 77 points.

Still, Rutgers defense is strongest against the run.

Brown became the third different marquee back — and the second player who came in as the nation’s leading rusher — to see his rushing numbers take a hit coming out of a game with Rutgers.

The Huskies’ star came in averaging 177.8 yards per game. He managed 107 on 27 carries in the Knights’ 12-10 victory — getting just 7 yards on 13 carries in the second half.

[Shun] White topped the country in rushing at 196 yards per game when Rutgers traveled to Annapolis. He finished with 85 on 16 carries.

Devine? He was averaging 99.8 before facing the Knights. He had 55 yards on 19 carries that game.

“It’s all about our preparation,” said middle linebacker Ryan D’Imperio, named the Big East’s Defensive Player of the Week for his 11-tackle performance against the Huskies. “We don’t just go out there and it happens. It’s not an accident.”

Good thing, because there’s another challenge waiting on Saturday. This time it’s Pittsburgh’s LeSean McCoy, the Big East’s second-leading rusher at an average of 114.8 yards per game.

“Everyone is a competitor. You like playing against the best,” said defensive tackle Pete Tverdov. “I wish we could play the leading rusher in the nation every week. That would be awesome.

“McCoy, just like the other backs we’ve faced, provides a huge challenge. When you face a back as good as he is, it tests your manhood a little bit. Can you step up to the challenge? Will you be prepared and ready to go?

“This will be another huge test we’ll have to pass.”

But there’s a statistical quirk about what the defensive unit has accomplished: By the numbers, Rutgers isn’t anything special against the run, checking in at No. 72 nationally (out of 119 schools) in that category.

Of course Rutgers lost 2 of those 3 matchups, so I’ll settle for McCoy rushing for under his average if Pitt wins. Yet apparently that defense is why Paul Zeise sort of picked a Rutgers upset.

5. Why hasn’t this program been able to beat Rutgers in its last three matchups? Are these players cognizant of that?

The players definitely know that. They might be best-served to watch films of (former Pitt coach) Walt Harris’s offense run up and down the field against Rutgers defense and incorporate some of the protection schemes into their offense. This offensive scheme seems to be a bad matchup with Rutgers. Instead, we’ll see them try to pound the ball between the tackles against Rutgers and throw short passes — which is playing to Rutgers strengths. I expect this to be a very low scoring game — and I think Rutgers will win again.

I agree insofar as Rutgers’ defense wants to stop the run and Pitt wants to run. So it is strength against strength. It’s just that Rutgers wasn’t very good for most of the Harris time, so to compare them without appropriately taking that into account seems silly. Though, Pitt coaches might take note that Rutgers CBs are under 6-foot (*cough* Baldwin *cough*).

Hey, here’s something familiar. A strong defense, but not creating a lot of turnovers.

Schiano has acknowledged that he has never been through a turnover drought quite like this in his coaching career.

In seven games, Rutgers has produced four turnovers — all against Morgan State, the only non-Bowl Subdivision opponent on its schedule. That makes the Knights 0-for-6 against the rest of their schedule.

And that explains the grim numbers in the latest NCAA statistics: Rutgers is tied for last nationally (with Washington) for fewest turnovers caused, is 116th (out of 119 schools) in interceptions with two and is 108th in fumbles recovered, also with two.

And of course, Mike Teel will still be the QB for Rutgers.





All the difference by a semicolon:

“This will be another huge test; we’ll have to pass.”

Comment by cheech 10.23.08 @ 4:38 pm

Zeisi,
With absolutely terrible insight into this one. The reason Pitt beat up on Rutgers under Harris and not Wannstedt isn’t due to how each Coach game plans against Rutgers. It is that: RUTGERS WAS TERRRRRIBLE when Harris coached here. Even Johnny Majors the second time around could have coached a team to beat them. I also disagree with his prediction.

Comment by Zeise R u kiddin me? 10.23.08 @ 4:44 pm

Wow, talk about being outcoached…Coach Wanny looks like Vince Lombardi compared to the job by Coach Stewart @ WVU… Auburn outclassing them in all phases…Rhoads is having a blast!!

Comment by The Turk 10.23.08 @ 8:42 pm

I may have to recant that previous post.

Comment by The Turk 10.23.08 @ 9:50 pm

Recant and repent. Good for the Big East.

Comment by steve 10.23.08 @ 10:29 pm

Hey look, Paul Rhoads d can’t tackle, and gave up a 200 yard rushing performance in a big game! Frittered away a 14 point lead too! Who would’ve thought?! It gives me nightmares of the Jones Boys (Julius and Kevin) circa 2003. On the other hand, the conference needs wins against other BCS conferences, so yay. This will help those stats I do at the end of the year where I show how awful the ACC is, because they never beat anyone. Good work Hoopies. Now don’t win again.

Comment by maz. 10.23.08 @ 10:42 pm

Hoopies rock! Just for tonight though…..

I just threw up in my mouth a little

Comment by Dugdog 10.23.08 @ 10:52 pm

I don’t understand what Rhodes and Auburn were doing… You know, especially when they’re up late, WVU is running the ball… Devine took one to the house to seal the deal untouched. It wasn’t just poor tackling; it was terrible schemes and positioning.

Comment by john in dc 10.24.08 @ 12:13 am

Yeah, nice job by Ziese reading too much into the situation.

It’s pretty simple to breakdown: pre-2005 Rutgers was one of the worst programs in Div 1A football.

2005-2007: Ray Rice emerges and Rutgers has three good seasons. This coincides with Wanny’s first three years at Pitt, where his teams were not-so good.

2008: Exit Ray Rice, and Rutgers sucks again.

Jesus, this isn’t rocket science!!

And yes, a loss to Auburn would’ve looked pretty bad for the Big East. Let’s just hope this doesn’t kick start the hoopies’ season and lead to a conference title or anything.

Comment by Jimbo Covert's My Dad 10.24.08 @ 4:05 am

WVU looked very good last night. Devine can run and once White settled in he hit some beautiful passes. I was rooting for WVU to win for the sake of the BE, but when the game was over I thought that they were much better than we had given them credit for.

Comment by Reed 10.24.08 @ 5:18 am

The key to the Pitt/Navy game was Pitt’s defensive line was coached to tackle the fullback WHETHER HE HAD THE BALL OR NOT. Many times last night Devine ran right past Auburn’s defensive front who looked uncertain about who had the ball. Had they just tackled him anyway Devine would have had about 50 yards total.

Comment by 66Goat 10.24.08 @ 8:35 am

We will win this game Saturday. Were on a roll and a different team tahn the last two years. Dont forget we had Rutgers on the ropes and should have won last year, if it wasnt for that ridilus non offensive pass interference call.

Comment by Lou 10.24.08 @ 8:55 am

We also should have had them in 06 before Ray Rice tore off one big run and broke our back late in the fourth.

Comment by Rex 10.24.08 @ 10:19 am

I will never root for WV under any circumstances.

Comment by ChrisA 10.24.08 @ 11:10 am

Actually Reed, the Hoopies looked like complete and utter dog doo-doo in the first half….seriously, that was some awful football. They did something right at half time though. 66Goat, you’re right about Auburn’s defensive front, they looked lost on that field in the second half.

Comment by Dugdog 10.24.08 @ 11:13 am

WVU looked good last night cause Def. Coor. P Rhodes knows how to defend the run against WVU. You have to read and react!

Comment by pittguy 10.24.08 @ 3:52 pm

Dugdog – yes, they looked bad in the first half, but good teams adjust when needed and play 60 minutes to win, which is what WVU did.

My point was that all the PITT fans that thought WVU was on a downhill slide because of 13-9 and that we are a lock to beat them in Nov might have another thing coming. It’ll be a dofight at Heinz that game.

Comment by Reed 10.25.08 @ 6:14 am

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter