masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
October 19, 2008

Defensive Domination

Filed under: Coaches,Football,Opponent(s) — Chas @ 9:13 pm

Everyone who didn’t think, “Here we go again,” when Navy took their opening possession of the game and marched it right down on Pitt for a quick score, was either a delusional optimist or really, really drunk. At that first score, I literally live-paused the game on the DVR, and stalked outside to curse for a few minutes before coming back in to watch with my now very confused daughter.

That 63-yard opening drive took less than 3 minutes and suddenly all those concerns from the coaching staff regarding how Navy would kill the clock on long drives, from earlier in the week seemed to be the most ridiculous thing. Whether it was just an opening drive slow response from being off. Or pride kicking in. The coaches getting in the players faces. That drive would constitute 1/4 of the total yards Navy would produce the rest of the game. The other 24+ minutes Navy had the ball, they could only get 188 yards. It was their lowest output in yardage in 2 years.

Navy was held to 251 total yards and 12 first downs, its fewest since an Oct. 14, 2006 loss to Rutgers. Nose tackle Rashaad Duncan (seven tackles) led the way as the Panthers dominated the line of scrimmage and middle linebacker Scott McKillop was very disruptive as the Midshipmen were limited to a season-low 194 yards rushing.

“We had some trouble doing some things out there. We couldn’t sustain anything,” Bryant said. “We were so close on so many plays of busting a long gain.”

McKillop was largely responsible for bottling up fullback Eric Kettani, who managed a mere 13 yards on eight carries. Kettani had absolutely no running room and was often tackled as soon as he took the handoff.

“We couldn’t get anyone to the middle linebacker. He was all over the place. We couldn’t get the fullback going. In our offense, if you can’t get the fullback going it’s hard to get the pitch going,” said White, who managed just 30 yards on nine carries other than the 40-yard run.

McKillop was singled out by the Navy defense as the biggest disrupter to their game.

“You have to give them credit,” Navy coach Ken Niumatalolo said. “Their two stars played well. We had a hard time blocking [linebacker Scott] McKillop and we had a hard time tackling McCoy.”

2006 was also the last time they lost a game that badly.

Nose tackle Rashaad Duncan (seven tackles) was a force up front as the Panthers held the Mids to a season-low 194 yards rushing, their lowest total in two years. It was a 360 degree turnaround from a year ago when Navy rolled up 331 yards rushing at Heinz Field.

“I thought our defensive coaches had a real good, sound scheme. We really did a lot of research on what they did and we felt like we had to stop the fullback, which we did,” Pittsburgh head coach Dave Wannstedt said. “I thought we kept it simple. Things weren’t as complicated as they were a year ago and we let some guys make plays and used the athletic ability that we have.”

Cornerback Jovani Chappel and end Jabaal Sheard (six tackles apiece) also had good games as Pittsburgh held Navy fullback Eric Kettani to 13 yards on eight carries.

This was a game where the speed on defense really showed up. Sheard and Romeus were coming off the edges all game long. Greg Williams at linebacker really stayed in position to contain, and with his speed could keep the option runner from turning the corner. According to Coach Wannstedt, it was a K.I.S.S approach by the coaches.

“I thought our defensive coaches had a real good, sound scheme,” Wannstedt said. “We did a lot of research on what they did and we felt like we had to stop the fullback, and we did.

“We kept it simple. Things weren’t as complicated as they were a year ago, and we let some guys make plays and just used the athletic ability we have.”

Navy — their coaches and players — knew what had happened, and owned up to it.

There wasn’t much for Navy’s players to say following their 42-21 loss to No. 23 Pittsburgh yesterday afternoon. When cornerback Rashawn King was asked about Pittsburgh’s dynamic tailback LeSean McCoy, he simply said, “He’s fast.” When quarterback Jarod Bryant was asked for his thoughts on the game, he responded, “They’re a good team, and they just put it on us.”

Their head coach took the brunt of the blame.

“We just got our butts whipped in all facets,” Navy head coach Ken Niumatalolo said. “I did a bad job of getting our team ready. (Pitt’s staff) did a great job of getting their players ready. Both teams had byes. We had a week to prepare, they had a week to prepare. They played better than we did and that starts with me.”

Always have to give credit to a coach that takes the blame and not on the players or the fact that their star otpion QB was out for the game.





17 in BCS and AP

Comment by Brian 10.19.08 @ 10:12 pm

Chas, kudos for taking the cursing outdoors, haha.

Comment by Dugdog 10.19.08 @ 10:14 pm

When was the last time that Pitt was ranked this high in the BCS?

Comment by Pitt '05 10.19.08 @ 11:21 pm

It is still obscene that Pitt is ranked lower than South Florida. I don’t care that they were ranked and Pitt wasn’t, that Pitt’s one loss was to bowling green. The fact of the matter is that they have the same record and Pitt won the head to head. How bout a little respect? It would be a little more forgiveable if the game was at Pitt, but Pitt beat them in their own house. Anyone who ranks SFU before them is insane.

Comment by Ralpha 10.19.08 @ 11:50 pm

Ralph,

See my comment in the previous topic about this.

I share your sentiment, as do a lot of other people.

It seems that the human poll portions of the BCS (Coach’s and Harris poll) had us ranked anywhere from 4-6 spots behind USF (they’re 14th in both, we’re 18th in the Harris and 20th in the coach’s).

However, the BCS computers gave us some love as they had us at 15th (2 spots better than any human poll) and USF at 22nd (8 spots lower than they are in the Harris or coach’s poll), hence we’re only 1 spot behind them in the final standings.

I’m not even mentioning the AP poll here, because I feel that once the first BCS standings come out, the AP poll is pretty irrelevant these days and I have no idea why networks continue to use those rankings after this point in the season.

Comment by Jimbo Covert's My Dad 10.20.08 @ 2:30 am

A great game plan, you have to give props to the Stache Jr. He had the triple option nailed down and his players executed. Terrific game considering how we got rolled last year.

Wow, I cant wait to see Jonnathan Baldwin next year. Tons of potential.

We need to steamroll Rutgers before we head to South Bend. I am not worried at all about the rankings right now, it means absolutely nothing. Keep winning and the polls will take care of themselves. There is no one on the schedule we cant beat, its now a matter of focus, execution, and staying healthy.

Comment by Rex 10.20.08 @ 7:32 am

Comparing last year’s play to this year’s, it appears that Coach Bennett is better than Coach Rhoads.

Comment by steve 10.20.08 @ 8:50 am

Thats how you stop the triple option!

Comment by Lou 10.20.08 @ 12:13 pm

Just to stir the pot…I have two one-loss teams, one of them lost at home to a team from the lower tier of a middle of the road non-BCS conference; the other lost at home to a Top 20 BCS conference school. If I am voting on the total body of work for the season so far, which team do I rank higher?

Comment by HbgFrank 10.20.08 @ 1:04 pm

I see your point Frank.

But when these two teams played head to head and one beat the other, there’s no guesswork involved anymore.

You know who the better team is because it happened ON THE FIELD!

Same record, but one beat the other, you put the team that one head-to-head ahead of the other.

If that’s not the case, then why even play games against each other when you’re just going to use guesswork based on previous opponents to decide anyways?

Comment by Jimbo Covert's My Dad 10.20.08 @ 3:50 pm

thats why college football needs a playoffs, the the teams handle it on the field instead of polls.

Comment by mike 10.21.08 @ 7:40 am

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter