masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
March 26, 2005

Because He Won’t

Filed under: Uncategorized — Chas @ 10:15 am

I will call some attention to it. One of the very infrequently posting members of PSB, John has a website to promote his new (and future) books.

Deadhouse chronicles the exploits of a diverse team of death investigators at a coroner’s office in Pittsburgh. Ed Strimlan is a doctor who never got to practice medicine, so instead he diagnoses how people die. Mike Chichwak is a stolid ex-paramedic, respected around the coroner’s office for his compassion and doggedness. Tiffani Hunt is twenty-one, a single mother who questions whether she wants to spend her nights around dead bodies.

All three deputy coroners share one trait: a compulsive curiosity. A good thing too, because any observation at a death scene can prove meaningful. A bag of groceries standing on a kitchen counter, the milk turning sour. A broken lamp lying on the carpet of an otherwise-tidy living room. When they approach a corpse, the investigators consider everything. Is the victim face-up or down? How stiff are the limbs? Are the hands dirty or clean? By the time they bag the body and load it into the coroner’s wagon, Tiffani, Ed and Mike often have unearthed intimate details that are unknown even to the victim’s family and friends.

We’ll skip the CSI: Pittsburgh jokes.

Congratulations, John, but now you have less excuses not to post some more from Hoopieland.

B-Ball Notes: Roasting Dixon

Filed under: Uncategorized — Chas @ 8:44 am

In the final basketball Q&A for Ray Fittipaldo, it would appear that the overwhelming majority of the questions were declarations that Coach Dixon sucks and then asking variations of when will he be fired. Similar bile was spewed Dixon’s way in the letters page. You would have thought this team was Providence.

Over at ACC BasketBlog there is an interesting piece regarding ever-embattled NC State coach Herb Sendek as a zen master:

But we have not wanted our short, balding leader to only conform to our peers’ successes, we’ve wanted him to conform to our expectations of a good coach and strong leader. You know, to do things like, well, win lots of games. Or, at least demonstrate good communication skills. I mean, if he can’t connect to us and the media, how can he possibly make sense to his players? It’s very hard to picture Sendek rallying his kids in the locker room, shouting before taking the floor, “our paradigm for defense is more holistic!” You know what though, I can totally picture him calmly reciting parables from Bhudda in the middle of a timeout.

The criticisms that have plagued Sendek in the past reemerged stronger than ever. He can’t win close games. He had at least four games to show that he could draw up a play at the end of a game to get off a good shot, and his team failed each time. He can’t adjust his diligently prepared plans in mid-game. He had no answer when woeful UVa, of all teams, surprised him with a stall and possession game plan. He doesn’t know how to develop players or best utilize his personnel. Andrew Brackman, after starting so strong, all but disappeared from the box scores in midseason.

[Emphasis added.]

While I don’t see Dixon as a zen master, the issues of communication and what is expected from a head coach is a factor in the number of Pitt fans ready throw Dixon off the bus after this season. His public communication skills has been something that has driven me up a wall these 2 seasons.

Let’s face it, Pitt fans (and most Pittsburghians) like their coaches and managers to be loud, forceful, emotional and blunt. On and off the court/field. There is a sort of appreciation with that. Like the coach understands the fans’ emotions and feelings.

With Coach Dixon, no matter how much he yells and stomps on the sidelines, when it comes time for that interview — ugh and yawn. He just drops into zombie-cliched-coach.

Another piece rating the draft and top Power Forward prospects (Subs. only).

Most GMs will tell you that they always draft for talent, never for need. The problem with that theory is that most teams always need more big men.

The ability of an athletic, 6-foot-10 power player to change the course of a game or season is proven and most teams, especially bad ones, are always in the hunt for them.

That’s why, year after year, the lottery is usually dominated by folks 6-8 and taller.

As many as five of this year’s lottery picks will likely be power forwards. Nowadays they come in all shapes and sizes. Some are big, burly bruisers like Pittsburgh’s Chris Taft and Duke’s Shelden Williams. Others are skilled fours who dominate outside as well as inside like Utah’s Andrew Bogut and Lithuania’s Martynas Andriuskevicius. And then there’s your yearly quota of guys like Hakim Warrick and Wayne Simien who would be lottery picks if they grew two or three more inches in college.

And here’s the rub. Different scouts like different types of power forwards, meaning that the stock of everyone except Bogut and Spain’s Fran Vasquez is all over the place. A few scouts still have Taft in the top five. Others have dropped him down into the late teens. Some scouts have Warrick in the late lottery, others in the 20s. A couple of scouts have Simien in the middle of the first round, others in the second round.

In other words, creating a consensus ranking of the top 10 power forwards this early, before we know who is drafting where, is almost impossible. It’s a bit of a mess.

2. Chris Taft, Pittsburgh
The line: 6-10, 260, Sophomore
The skinny: After sleepwalking through the season, Taft might have done enough in the first round of the tournament to help resurrect his draft stock. Taft has the rare combination of size, athleticism, strength and power that had NBA scouts calling him a top-three pick before the season began. However, his lackluster performance during the regular season has raised serious questions about his work ethic and attitude. Despite the hand wringing, everyone still concedes that the chances of Taft’s falling out of the top 10, if he declares, are slim. There’s a dearth of athletic big men in college basketball. When one comes along, very few teams are willing to pass him up. If he can follow up his solid tournament performance with some great individual workouts, his stock will rise. He’s not the stellar prospect he was at the beginning of the season, but in the right system, with the right motivation, Taft still has the most potential of any big guy on the board. Where that leaves him on draft night is anyone’s guess. Most scouts still have him rated between the Nos. 5 and 10 picks. However, a couple have moved him entirely out of the lottery.

In other words, if this season didn’t really hurt his draft stock by more than a couple spots, what does coming back actually do for him?

Focus on Line Play

Filed under: Uncategorized — Chas @ 8:19 am

Specifically the offensive line.

Offensive tackle Mike McGlynn felt almost powerless as Utah’s defense mercilessly blitzed Pitt quarterback Tyler Palko in the Utes’ 35-7 Fiesta Bowl shellacking of the Panthers in January.

He was horrified when he watched film of the game and found out Palko was sacked nine times.

How do you think we felt?

The players on the offensive line seem very optimistic about the running game. Saying this gives them a chance to be more aggressive and attack. I like the optimism, but I’m hoping for more than that. I’m hoping they, you know, learn more technique and get more skilled. Pitt’s running game last year, was practically null, in large part because the offensive line couldn’t produce any penetration or create holes.

The change in offensive philosophy, while welcomed by the offensive linemen, will not come without sacrifice. The first thing is, all of the linemen have been asked to drop a little bit of weight — on average between 15 to 20 pounds — because they will be asked to move around a lot more.

Losing weight, however, does not mean losing strength. McGlynn and Simonitis said they are losing weight gradually while getting stronger and quicker. That should produce a line that is not only fast and physical, but lean and mean as well.

Because Wannstedt wants his linemen to be leaner and quicker, there could be a number of players who will lose their jobs. The competition for starting jobs on the offensive line figures to be intense as the players must prove they are capable of playing physical football.

Well, that and graduation of a number of players on the O-line.

The P-G Pitt football beat reporter Paul Zeise has a Q&A this first week of spring practice. A lot of the questions involve individual present and former players. But there is this.

Q: Is it true Pitt is changing its uniforms for the 2005 season?

ZEISE: Yes, but from what I understand the changes, while noticeable, will be more subtle than the rumors out there would suggest. This is not going to like 1976 or 1982. From what I was told it will look more like last year with some slight alterations to the numbers and the logo. You never know, though, the athletic department is trying to keep this secret until they have a grand unveiling later in the spring or early summer. You’d think by the way everyone is so hush, hush about it they were holding nuclear secrets or something.

Q: How well is Dave Wannstedt being received by high school coaches in recruiting?

ZEISE: Tremendous. He is being given celebrity coach status almost everywhere he has been. That’s the kind of respect and attention that is usually reserved for the big-name coaches out there. One assistant told me they used to walk in the back door of a lot of schools in Florida, for instance, and head straight to the coaches office. Now, they walk in the front and they are greeted by teachers and students looking to meet coach Wannstedt and even get his autograph. That kind of buzz is what the last regime lacked, although they obviously had success in a lot of areas as well. I think — although the Penn State-conspiracy theories about certain high school coaches in this area are juvenile – it is significant that Wannstedt’s first recruit for next year is from Gateway. The last staff seemed to shun and push away, rather than embrace and work with, Terry Smith because of his Penn State roots, which was a mistake. Pitt likely wouldn’t have gotten Justin King anyway, but let me tell you, as many players as Gateway has and will have, this is certainly a coach you want on your side. So that’s a great sign and it is an even better sign that I’ve seen Smith at practices this spring with some of his other players and I’ve talked to him and he really likes and respects Wannstedt and appreciates the way Pitt is doing things.

Also, the strength and conditioning coach, Mike Kent is still with the team. Zeise seems quite pleased with that.

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter