masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
January 2, 2019

The loss to Stanford in the Sun Bowl could be something of a microcosm for Pitt this year.

The struggles to move the ball to start the game. There was that solid surge in the second and third quarter where Pitt was moving the ball and looked like the more dominant team. Then that fade to black in the fourth quarter. Where the team couldn’t finish and/or couldn’t make the plays.

It’s one of those things. If you look back on Pitt’s 2018 season, just in terms of wins and losses, the Panthers were right around where they were expected to be. Excepting the UNC game, they lost the games you would have expected them to lose. And they won the games you would have expected them to win, other then Syracuse.

It’s the way they lost those games, though. Oh, is it the way they lost those games.

Not simply the blowouts. The inability of the offense to perform. Against PSU, UCF, ND, Miami, Clemson and Stanford. The offense managed only 6 TDs (2 other TDs came on special teams).

There is no way to look back on the 2018 season, and not conclude that the offense is a problem.

The actual problems and the fix? That’s where the debate lies.

The obvious starting point is the Offensive Coordinator. Shawn Watson was a “meh” hire at best when it was announced. His biggest claim to fame was being the OC and QB coach at Louisville with Teddy Bridgewater. Other than that, he had stints as OC at Colorado and Nebraska that were not bad but hardly great.

Watson was and is a pure vanilla OC. He has generally found his work under defensive-minded head coaches who agree with a conservative offensive approach.

There doesn’t seem to be too much debate among the fanbase that Watson should not be retained. From bad playcalling to the complete elimination of the tight end as anything more then an offensive lineman. From only calling for passes that go to the sidelines to having receivers run convoluted routes that take too long to develop. Pick your own favorite thing to hate what Watson does.

Oh, and let’s not forget that Watson is also the QB coach.

With the exception of the running game, Watson doesn’t do anything in the offense to play to the strength of the players or mask the deficiencies.

Speaking of deficiencies, let’s talk a little about the O-line and pass protection. I know, what pass protection?

I realize run blocking and pass protection require two very different approaches for offensive linemen. There’s the need to hold the block longer; the requirement to stand your ground more then just push forward.

That said, holy shit was this unit bad at pass protection. I don’t recall ever seeing an O-line that could be so good at run blocking; but so incapable of handling pass protection. Not only was the quarterback under constant pressure when dropping back; but that inability to prevent D-lines from pushing through, likely played a significant part in not allowing Kenny Pickett to step forward and throw to the middle of the field. It’s hard to do that when you are striding right into the rush.

I can’t even put it all on new OL Coach Dave Borbely, as pass protection was an issue last year as well. The single dimension of Pitt’s offense has been heavily influenced by what the O-line can do.

This seems to fall under the heading of recruiting and more the area that the head coach needed to address. The O-line has seen its talent decline steadily over the last two years as the guys that Paul Chryst recruited have graduated.

Consider what this O-line would have been like if Stefano Millin hadn’t been available as a grad transfer. Then think about the fact that Millin, Alex Bookser, Mike Herndon and Connor Dintino are all seniors. Next year, if Jimmy Morrissey isn’t healed and ready by the start of the season, the entire O-line will be new.

I have no idea about the O-line for 2019, but it is hard to be optimistic.

Then there is the evaluation and development of wide receivers. Along with the tight ends, the attrition at WR has been something. A lot of potential, but a lot of misses on evaluations at this spot.

Pitt was very lucky that Indiana transfer, Taysir Mack, was given immediate eligibility. He was Pitt’s leading receiver for the year and that came even with missing 3.5 games due to an injury. Maurice Ffrench’s emergence was a good thing. After that, though, there were problems.

Tre Tipton and Aaron Mathews have never become consistent or reliable targets. Injuries have played a role in that, but it has been disappointing to not see more from either.

Rafael Araujo-Lopes and Shocky Jacques-Louis were not utilized as much as expected. Araujo-Lopes, especially considering hie emergence last year. This, likely goes to the schemes and routes they have to run. Both are smaller wide receivers playing in the slot and expected to make catches over the middle. But if you aren’t throwing the ball over the middle too much…

That brings us to the quarterback. The most polarizing point of the offense. Kenny Pickett.

I’m sure you have thoughts. So do I.

After the Miami game last year, he definitely got overhyped. The fans, desperate to believe that Pitt finally had the dynamic QB who could run and pass were ready and willing. The coaching staff, for whatever reason, fed that belief.

From the reports of how great Pickett looked in practice. To the lack of interceptions. To trumpeting his leadership, competitiveness, etc. Not to say they weren’t true. Or at least holding truthiness. But they set  a very high bar for a kid who had one start and appeared in only two other games.

Then the season happened and Pickett looked very much like a young QB learning on the job. He missed throws. He didn’t make the right reads consistently. There were parts where he stayed in the pocket too long and others where he just took off too soon.

His passing numbers are amazingly low for a QB at this time. Under 2000 yards for the year. I know Pitt was heavily imbalanced on run to pass, but for a QB who took all but a handful of snaps. In 2018. That’s horrid. Again, a lot of the fault rests with the playcalling and the OC; but Pickett finished the season with a completion rate under 60%.

Personally, I still think he can be a very good QB for Pitt. But the concern I have is the scarring from a season like this.

I always go back to that Rutgers team in the late aughts. It’s an extreme example.

When Tom Savage was tossed out there right away. His first season was very promising, but he was taking a lot of hits and under a lot of pressure due to his O-line. It took a toll on him as the second year saw him not just struggle but steadily degrade. So concerned with the pressure and the hits. He got injured and a new freshman QB (Chas Dodd) took over and looked dynamite the rest of the way. Savage lost his job and transferred. But back at Rutgers the hits on Dodd started adding up in his second year. He became as gun shy and skittish as Savage had been. Eventually Dodd lost the gig as well. I believe to Gary Nova.

A bad O-line can destroy any QB in the college game over time. They are still kids. They are still learning at that point.

Honestly, more then anything else, that will be my big question about Pickett for the offseason. Everything else can improve. He can get more accurate. His footwork will improve. He will get better on his reads in the filmroom and with all the reps he’s’ had. But his psyche? That’s the big unknown.

I very much doubt that Narduzzi wants to make a change at OC. At the same time, I don’t think he has much of a choice. This was a season that teetered on the brink of complete disaster halfway through.

The defense improved throughout the season. The offense simply leaned on the run to absurd lengths which worked for a while. But in college football — hell, these days, football in general — you have to be able to throw the ball.

I guess I am hoping for a little symmetry. Ten years ago, Pitt went to the Sun Bowl. The QB had a bomb of a game and Pitt couldn’t generate enough offense against a Pac-12 (10 at the time) that was missing their top running back and had other injuries. The complete offensive ineptitude forced the defensive-minded coach to make a change at OC. Let’s find out if history repeats.

 





Danielson said it perfectly a few times: when you don’t pass the ball much, the mistakes that were made against Stanford were to be expected. Missed reads, wrong routes, bad pass protection, etc. Pickett is a good sized QB with above average qualities across the board. He and the rest of the offense were not put in a position to succeed. How many times was he forced to throw when the defense knew it was coming? I don’t have the stats, but it seemed like an inordinate proportion of times he was throwing on 3rd and long. If I had a bunch of smaller quick possession/slot WR’s to throw to, I’d want to give them the best opportunity to get open. That means using the whole field, which we all know didn’t happen. If I were Pickett, and a new OC wasn’t hired, I’d be thinking transfer. If Narduzzi can’t realize that Watson isn’t the answer, then we’ve probably seen his ceiling.

Comment by StevieMac 01.02.19 @ 12:33 pm

You usually can’t do something well if you don’t do it often. The mistakes the offense made (missed reads, wrong routes, poor pass protection) can be mostly attributed to that one fact in my humble opinion. Danielson said it several times during the Stanford game. If an OC with a different philosophy isn’t hired, I would be thinking transfer if I were Pickett. If Narduzzi stubbornly supports Watson, then we’ve already seen his ceiling and he’s dug his own grave.

Comment by StevieMac 01.02.19 @ 12:47 pm

I think HCPN did a remarkable job this year considering what he had to work with. His offense overall ranked 96th and defense ranked 69th. This according to ESPN.

Comment by Roc2 01.02.19 @ 1:22 pm

If they fire Watson, he has to get away from two of his requirements when Canada left.

1. Do not mandate a pro-style offense (he even called it a dinosaur in the press leading up to the bowl game)
2. Do not pigeon hole Pitt into an established P5 OC. Take a chance on an OC from a non-P5 school or a rising star on a P5 team.

… Canada is available if you want those two buckets filled but they are a unicorn …

Comment by Tossing Thabeets 01.02.19 @ 3:46 pm

When Watson was coming in, there was a Poster who said that there was no reason to think that Watson would not use Tight Ends in his Offense.

Can’t remember who that was.

Maybe somebody can help me remember.

Comment by PittofDreams 01.02.19 @ 4:16 pm

I’m convinced that to run a Pro-style offense in college football, you need Pro-style talent. Alabama gets away with it because they’re stacked at every position. They don’t have to stretch the field – they can just beat you down any way they want. Other high-talent level teams do as well, but ‘bama is just really good at it.

Question: I have heard some say that one of the reason we get some of the talent we do manage to land (or did manage to land…) was that there are some recruits who prefer that system because it helps prepare them for the “next level”. Any truth to this? I ask because in some sick, twisted way, I actually miss Walt Harris and the insanity of his game. The games were entertaining win or lose, and some good kids came out of that program.

Comment by 55 01.02.19 @ 5:30 pm

3rd & 4, two and half minutes left in the game, and we have 2 time outs. Watson has Pickett throwing the ball? WTF was he thinking? That’s in and of itself is enough of a reason to show him the door. Additionally I can’t think they practiced a two minute drill ever. Time is ticking away and they are taking all day to get to the line scrimmage? It was a hot mess in many ways.

Comment by Tony in Harrisburg 01.02.19 @ 5:44 pm

Zero buzz on Matt Canada out there if Duzz wants to dip into that well again. Team has kept the playbook and terminology so he’d slide right in. Jim Bob Cooter just became available too if he’s dead-set on hiring a pro-style OC. Ole Miss just hired their second OC of the offseason. lol. Hello … Pitt …

Comment by Tossing Thabeets 01.02.19 @ 7:36 pm

This weekend is set up to be a huge recruiting event for Narduzzi in so many ways. 1) Pitt will upset North Carolina at the Pete Saturday in front of a frenzied crowd 2) Holgorsen left WVU today 3) PSU lost their bowl game and the campus sucks anyway (been there once – not fun to me ) 4) ACC Coastal champs = big momentum for the future / come be a part of rebuilding a storied program to it’s once great stature theme !!! 5) And last but not least : weather in the mid-upper 50’s !

Comment by daddylonglegs 01.02.19 @ 10:47 pm

????????????
You’re one of the better writers out there, Chas.
And I’d really like for you to keep it up.
Or give it away, as mentioned in an earlier note.
So much history you have here. And yet notta comment hardly during the season.
I get the fact that we have families and day-jobs to care for ultimately.
But you are missed when you leave in Absentia. Without word to your fan base.
—Neil

Comment by Neil 01.03.19 @ 3:39 am

We need an OC that can recruit as well as coach. We will never get good offensive recruits under Narduzzi alone and that’s fine.

Go out and get an OC with cachet…for example an ex-Head coach from a P5. Pay him – And if he only stays one season, so what, go find another one Next year. Recruits know that there is always turn over with head coaches and assistants – but it would build their confidence that their replacements would be solid. Narduzzi could hand him the offense and walk away…maybe take fewer notes on the sideline.

Maybe that’s too extreme, but I just don’t see us getting talent any other way. We are not going to get quality recruits based solely on our name.

Comment by BN 01.03.19 @ 8:48 am

Thanks Chas.

I spent the whole off season trying to temper fan’s expectations for Pickett in 2018. I wrote continually that we saw exactly one (1) TD pass from him the year before…and that was a trick shovel pass to boot.

I did think he’d do better than the horrible performance we saw though… The was the worse QB play we have had in many years.

Comment by Reed 01.03.19 @ 9:14 am

Well said Chas.

Comment by ck 01.03.19 @ 11:55 am

The pedos lost their QB and top RB going into next season. The hoopies lost their HC and maybe some recruits.

Winning that last game at Creepy Valley would go a long way to salvaging next season.

Comment by Jackagain 01.03.19 @ 6:35 pm

One of Walt’s strengths was an ability to put together a scheme that took a mediocre OL into consideration. His final line was pretty much intact when the Wanny/Cavanaugh era began but had Palko running for his life much of the game. In Watson we once again have a coach who is coaching the team that he wants; not the team that he has.

Comment by 2$Chuck 01.03.19 @ 8:56 pm

Great article Chas, Interesting that some crowed a year ago that Pickett was the greatest QB that Pitt had recruited in a long long time. I noted that while he doesn’t turn over the rock only Temple and UNC actively recruited him and was mocked by QB Guru. He has no field vision and strong arm or not he consistently overthrows his receivers even when he has time. But it is not all his fault.

The OL got man-handled by Miami and Clemson. OC Watson insisted on the QB throwing on the rollout but this was not one of Pickett’s strengths. Pass routes rarely had multiple receivers open. With the passing game in football so wide open what we have here is a joke. If Nard wants to stick to “pro style” attack we will continue in mediocrity. Even the pros are opening up. A really talented offensive mind needs to be hired regardless of P5 or not. I have absolutely no doubt Nard will continue as his current mind set on offense and Pitt will be mediocre for 7 years to come. Hire a modern offensive OC and open the competition at QB- only “cold grinding grizzly bear jaws hot on your heels” leads to improvement at any position.
TT were you the one who said 10 wins should be the standard? Always enjoy your insights,
Again Chas great article.

Comment by RKB 01.03.19 @ 9:16 pm

RKB – Right on. 10 wins should be the standard. Look at what Houston just did with that standard. Applewhite was one of the hottest names on the market two years ago. Back to back sub-par seasons and he’s gone … and they just spent $4M a year on an established HC. The Pitt football program needs some excitement. Look no further than the basketball side of the house to see what a little hope does. UNC game will be sold out tomorrow. I’m not saying Duzz should be fired but I expected more in year 4, with even more optimism heading into year 5. If Houston can fire a head coach seen as a future star in the sport, Pitt certainly can fire a moribund OC. C’mon Duzz … or Heather … step up and do what has to be done.

Comment by Tossing Thabeets 01.04.19 @ 11:22 am

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter