That’s a credit to Pitt’s Associate AD for Media Relations, E.J. Borghetti and his staff making them happy.
The Football Writers Association of America polled themselves to find out which sports information departments really stood out.
The Football Writers Association of America has announced its first “Super 11” field of sports information departments, which were deemed the best in the NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision during the 2009 season.
In alphabetical order those 11 schools are: Buffalo, Clemson, East Carolina, Georgia, Nebraska, Pittsburgh, Rutgers, San Jose State, Southern California (USC), Texas and Utah.
“There are clearly many outstanding sports information departments across the country,” said Tim Griffin, 2010 FWAA President and chairman of the Super 11 Committee. “But our group felt there was a smattering of schools that merited commendation because of their exemplary work above and beyond the call of duty. This is our first collection in what will be an ongoing process.”
I can attest that E.J. Borghetti does a fantastic job at dealing with people. He knows how to engage them and makes them feel like he is on their side/helping them. All the while he is putting Pitt, the team, the players and the coaches in the best light possible.
Smizik notes an article that says Rutgers is the Big Tens First Choice for expansion followed by Missouri and then Pitt.
• Revenue. Having a large and full football stadium is key. A basketball arena, too. But a bigger factor might be the television market. More eyeballs equal more bucks.
Im pretty sure Pitt sells as many or more tickets than Rutgers and has a larger stadium.
• Geography. Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany told WSCR-AM 670 that he seeks a “geographic connectivity” that would help keep travel costs in check.
Pitt fits right in the middle of Big 11 country
• Academics. Every Big Ten school is a member of the Association of American Universities, a consortium of 62 leading research institutions in the United States and Canada. Big Ten expansion candidates Missouri, Pittsburgh, Rutgers and Syracuse are also members. So are dark-horse candidates Kansas, Nebraska and Colorado.
Academically Pitt has a great reputation in many fields of study.
• Recruiting. Whose area is most fertile?
Western PA is traditionally one of the hotbeds for high school football.
Four other factors can’t hurt Rutgers’ cause:
• Newark Liberty International Airport is 23 miles from New Brunswick, making Rutgers more accessible than many Big Ten campuses.
Pittsburgh Int Airport is just as close
• Rutgers calls itself “The Birthplace of College Football.” It beat Princeton in what must have been a thrilling contest in 1869. Final score: 6-4.
Pitt has one of the most storied programs in all of college football although its often overlooked.
• Delany hails from the Garden State — South Orange, N.J.
OK, they got us there!
• By leaving the Big East, Rutgers could quadruple its annual TV share to more than $20 million. Meaning that unlike with Texas and Notre Dame, an R.S.V.P would be a mere formality.
The fact that Rutgers would jump at the opportunity is a selling point? OK
Pitt has a great deal to offer … tradition, location, academics, research, very attractive FB & BB programs, etc .. but may lack in the main criterion .. TV market
In basketball, wow, what a great trade-off! In lieu of UConn, ND, Syracuse, Louisville, Villanova, an extra game against WVU and the schools in the NJ area (where I’m located) along with the Big East tourney, we pick up Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, Michigan, Indiana, Northwestern, etc. No wonder I salivating at the thought that Pitt might join the Big 10. (Disclaimer: I’m being facetious.)
Otherwise, Pitt brings very little to the Big 1o in market expansion. The Big 1o recruits Western Pennsylvania very well and the Western Pennsylvania market already has tons of PSU and tOSU grads therefore the TV market offers very little to expand.
Count on Rutgers or Syracuse bolting, they both have large untapped markets; no way Missouri will make the cut. If you think Penn State is remote, Columbia is just a rest stop off I70 about halfway between KC and St. Louis.
The Big 1o has a decent stake of the KC and St. Louis markets because of the Iowa and Illinois influence. I would equate The University of Missouri to WVU, pretty backward with tons of people who have dental issues and a very shallow gene pool.
Why? Probably because as Big 1x commish Jim Delany said it’s very premature to be talking about expansion let alone who would be invited. Delany said that they are just fact-finding and it will be 3-5 months before they even discuss next steps.
So what’s Greenstein’s motivation? Maybe it’s job security at a paper that’s still trying to work its way out of bankruptcy. He’s assigned to golf and college sports, neither of which is relevant in Chicago right now. Just an opinion.
I think if only one school from the Big East leaves, and that team is Rutgers, the Big East football conference can survive. If more than one school leaves, Pitt needs to do everything possible to make sure it is not left behind. I must admit, from a fan’s perspective, I really enjoy Big East basketball, culminating in the annual party at Madison Square Garden. I’d really miss that if Pitt left.
They are also within a resonable driving distance to IOwa, Wisc, NW, Ill and possibly Purdue and Minn.
i dont think they are this great conference that should be talked about so much…
why doesnt the BE try and bring in some other schools for FB and stop all this talk..
Why would any school leave the be wich is the best conference by far in hoops, best tourny and selling out every game for the big 10? i think for fb, both confernces are about the same…
money should not be the only factor, if it is, BE should get there own network similar to the Big 10 network, which i never watch.
I have spent a lot of time in the state of Missouri, actually way too much time.
The University of Missouri brings very little to the table in regards to true market expansion for the Big 1o.
Remember the Big 1o wants to “expand”, the state of Missouri presently has a Big 1o influence right now, it really does.
St. Louis is really into Illinois basketball but Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas City, Kansas are both heavily into KU basketball and I really do not see that changing ever.
Therefore RU or SU offer huge TV markets and a ton of potential, Missouri offers very little because of the current circumstances.
Expansion is about $$$’s an eastern move by the Big 1o will bring more dollars, therefore I must agree we respectfully disagree regarding the University of Missouri and proposed big 1o expansion.
Frankly until only recently Missouri Tiger football has only become relevant, right now the Rams and Chiefs suck so there is some interest in following Missouri football in KC and St. Lou, but when the pro teams win Tiger football is not the main attraction in the large Missouri cities.
WBB have you lived in Missouri?
I did for 24 years and trust me the Big 1o will not take Missouri, not enough market for expansion. The Big 1o will take Nebraska before Missouri.