masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
June 27, 2008

Still Waiting…

Filed under: Basketball,Injury,NCAA — Chas @ 9:28 am

You have to be kidding.

The decision on Pitt guard Mike Cook’s medical redshirt may not come this week, as has been reported.

According to a source close to the situation, the decision by the NCAA may take another month, not nearly as soon as coach Jamie Dixon told reporters earlier this week.

Exactly what other information do they need? What other factors are under consideration?

This is a decision where you balance the letter of the rule — player can’t play more than 1/3 of the season — which he hit in the Duke game where he got injured to get a medical redshirt. The spirit/mercy of the rule — not taking away the chance to play and compete in collegiate athletics because of injuries.

Complicating things is that Cook would essentially be a 6th year senior since he used a redshirt when he transferred from ECU.

Still, all of this is known. This really should be about the NCAA just making the decision already.





I don’t understand what could possibly take this long. It just doesn’t make sense to me. Maybe the NCAA is afraid of what critics would say about the possible success Pitt could have if Mike Cook were back.

Comment by James 06.27.08 @ 10:58 am

Come on, Chas – June and July are smack in the middle of vacation season!

Comment by Patrick 06.27.08 @ 11:38 am

Sorry if this has been asked before but is there any sort of precedent for granting a 6th year to a player who sat out a year due to transfer? Most of the 6th year waivers I’ve read about include a player being out one full year due to injury and then being out most of another year due to injury.

Comment by C 06.27.08 @ 11:53 am

I honestly thinks the NCAA grinds the process to a halt on purpose in these cases, hoping that the student-athlete will just give up and drop the case. Ben Mauk at Cincinnati is in an almost identical situation. The NCAA needs to grow a pair and just say yes or no.

Comment by J.D. 06.27.08 @ 12:25 pm

According to Wikipedia Jason White (you know, the Oklahoma QB who was ‘better’ than Larry Fitzgerald and won the Heisman) had a 6th year of eligibility the year after winning the heisman. He started at OU in 99, sat out 01 and 02 with injuries, won the heisman in 03 and was awarded a “second senior year” due to medical hardship in 04.

However, unlike Cook he didn’t sit out a year for transferring.

Comment by Adam 06.27.08 @ 1:45 pm

The NCAA will get criticized regardless of which way they go……… since they’re likely creating a Precedent. You’d think they’d realize though that the longer they wait…….. the more inept they look.

Comment by Mtoolmn 06.27.08 @ 1:47 pm

Jason White got a 6th year because of his 2 bionic knees.

I’d love to see Cook get a 6th year, but I think the fact that he transferred complicates things more than anything.

Comment by Ryan M. 06.27.08 @ 2:29 pm

Here’s a question. Who in the hell is Eric Hall and why do we think he knows what he’s talking about? He’s the only one who has written this- not the Pittsburgh papers, not Dokish, not Andy Katz, not Jeff Goodman, etc. And I think they would all know before Eric Freakin’ Hall, don’t you think? I mean, Dixon is quoted as saying next week, but there is no quote from anybody that says otherwise. Just somebody named Eric Hall who says somebody told him. And until this guy has a track record, I tend to belive that he’s full of it. Having said that, I would be very surprised if Cook got a sixth year.

Comment by Mark 06.27.08 @ 5:32 pm

Don’t expect anyone to know or remember this but in late 90s, Robt Morris had a good player named Kevin Covert who transferred from Akron. In his senior (5th) year, he had season ending injury in 1st EXHIBITION game vs Athletes in Action. Coach Schmitt was so sure that he would get another year of eligibility that he held open a scholarship .. but was denied. Few days later, Ohio St center named Jhnson was granted 6th year.

Remember what Tark said whne Kentucky was caught red-handed in bb recruiting scandal of late 80s ‘Boy,that will make the nCAA reaaly mad; the Fresno States better watch themselves’

Comment by wild Bill 06.27.08 @ 10:10 pm

“Remember what Tark said whne Kentucky was caught red-handed in bb recruiting scandal of late 80s ‘Boy,that will make the nCAA reaaly mad; the Fresno States better watch themselves’”

Ain’t that the fucking truth. How does U$C have a team, much less a national championship? Its ridiculous what they let “big” schools get away with.

Make a decision already.

Comment by Stuart 06.28.08 @ 3:49 am

True, Patrick, true… vacation time, inevitably bringing up arguments of what is, and not, “ethical” behavior-conduct regarding the Cook appeal.

Regardless, there comes a time when the only appropriate course of action is closure & settlement. As Chas indicated, in this hitherto ‘pending’ saga times-up; the opportunity for the Committee to show any ‘courtesy or class is expired.

It’s laughable (viz. insulting) because it shows little regard or respect to the individual (Cook, in this case; Ben Mauk, in another) and his-her need to move-on. Esp. when we weigh in the denominating factor here: this is the NCAA; subject: Student Athlete, attendee: ‘Institution of Higher Learning, etc.’

For those who feel compelled to argue the similarities btwn college athletes and their deserved comparison to corporate employees x, y, *yawn* z, let’s try to agree that, for all intensive purposes, this is not a ‘corporate decision’ about cutting the fat from your sales team.

…doesn’t look good for him at all — see Ben Mauk

Comment by Neil 06.28.08 @ 1:09 pm

[…] the date on Andy Katz’s blog post on this. It is for today, so it isn’t a rerun from info of last month. This is getting beyond stupid. The other problem with the continued delays is that it screws up […]


Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter