I’m stunned by the volume of comments regarding Cassin Diggs’ involuntary/voluntary transfer. It’s a healthy debate. As I stated the first go-round, I’m not entirely comfortable with what went down. My discomfort largely stems from the one-way situation college athletics once an athlete signs, and what strikes me as abusing that situation.

A few basic things.

A scholarship is renewable each year at the school’s discretion. The student has no say. If a student wishes to transfer and still play a sport, it is at the school’s discretion as to whether to release him, and can restrict where he goes. This is common when there is a new coaching change and a kid doesn’t feel comfortable in the new situation. Pitt benefited from such a situation when Mike Cook left East Carolina. The trade-off is that the player has to sit out a year if he transfers to another D-1 school.

Of course, if the kid isn’t released, he can still leave and enroll elsewhere. He won’t, however, be eligible for a scholarship for a year and can’t even walk-on to the team.

At the same time a new coach can decide a kid doesn’t fit what he wants and can simply not renew the scholarship of the kid even if he wants to stay, is in good academic standing and not in any trouble. Usually this only happens when there is a coaching change. At Colorado last year, Jeff Bzdelik did just that after taking over. Technically any coach could do that any time, but it would completely trash his reputation on the recruiting trail.

A National Letter of Intent is the first document a kid signs when he accepts a scholarship to a school. It is also yet another contract that is essentially a one-way street. It binds the kid to the school — as the schools are so fond of reminding everyone. A player doesn’t have to sign an NLI, but unless you are Tyreke Evans or of similar ability, most schools won’t give a scholarship unless you sign it.

The reality, though, is that a player is recruited by the coaches. They state how they want to play for the guy when they sign. They talk about the relationships built with the coaches. Then they are bound to the school.

Once you sign, you are stuck unless the agrees to release you. Indiana made oral promises (which it kept) to the basketball recruits who signed that they would be released from their NLI if Kelvin Sampson left or was fired before the 2008 season. They were boxed in since they wanted the kids to sign in the early period of November. The Sampson Cell Phone Saga broke in October.
It’s why Bob Hurley, Sr. was agitated and advocated so hard for Tyshawn Taylor’s release from Marquette. It was the only way to look out for what was still his kid.
With all of that looking at them, is it any wonder some of the top recruits milk the publicity and have the coaches pursuing them go through so many hoops? Might as well, after they sign all leverage is lost.

With all of this, I definitely tend towards coming down on the side of the players and hate to see kids used and discarded.

This brings things back to Diggs. Pitt sought and recruited him, but when they realized that his development was not going to approach what they already had he became optional. There are no indications he failed on his academic or off-the court requirements, or was at any risk of it happening. To speculate or theorize in that direction is to try and look for an excuse to justify things. If any of that was happening, it would have been released or leaked just to counter Diggs.

It really comes down to breaking down the limited statements from both sides. It’s hard to buy Coach Dixon’s statements that the decision was amicably reached since Diggs seems anything but that about transferring.

One thing that is apparent is that playing time was an issue. He wasn’t going to get it at Pitt, and did not appear to earn it by his play. From the limited action that was seen in the games he was no where close to being good enough. McGhee showed more ability and development than Diggs. Diggs, however, seemed to feel that he was going to get more playing time when he was recruited.

I doubt he was promised it, but I also think the coaches believed and allowed him to believe he would get minutes. That while he may not start, he would have been in the rotation at Center. Perhaps allowing Biggs to be moved to power forward. Really, that was the expectation many fans had going into the season.

I also think the analogy to an academic scholarship does not hold up real well for me. Perhaps its the contract aspect keeps me from buying it. In an academic scholarship there are clearer terms set out explaining what is expected of the student (which Maz noted). In an athletic scholarship, the terms are left open and vague. There is much more discretion in the agreement that gives the school and coach all the power. That makes the oral representations made to the recruited player more important. They may not be in the terms of the contract, but they are vital in explaining to the recruit what is expected and what he can expect.

The representations are made during the recruitment. While trying to get the recruit to sign with the school. I find it highly improbable that any coach would tell a recruit that if it turns out their evaluations were wrong and he isn’t good enough to compete at the level expected he will not have his scholarship renewed for the following year.

The other problem is that an academic scholarship is completely individual. An athletic scholarship, while having strong individual components also includes a team concept. Rick Pitino did not discourage Derrick Caracter from declaring that he was going to enter the NBA Draft, but when Caracter wanted to come back, Pitino said no. There was no hue and cry over that for a reason. Caracter had been a lousy teammate. He had been disciplined and suspended multiple times in his two years there. The only reason he kept getting chances was his individual ability. Ultimately his disruptions to the team and the chemistry was more detrimental than the ability he had on the court.

The team component should be a factor. Again, Diggs did nothing to indicate he was anything but a good and supportive teammate even if he saw no action. He didn’t stir things up in the season when the coaches kept suggesting he was having major hip issues — which he now disputes over how serious. He didn’t complain about his lack of playing time publicly.

Specific to Diggs, this is not as much about his limited production and not being good enough to see much more than mop-up minutes — and therefore not living up to his end of the agreement. This is about freeing up a scholarship for someone else that Coach Dixon thinks can help the team immediately.

Because college basketball is limited in the number of scholarships — as opposed to football — there is not a lot of room for error in recruiting kids. The value of each scholarship is huge. Austin Wallace is injured through next year and holding one scholarship and is not about to be cut loose (and I don’t know if the school could with his injury). Apparently Coach Dixon felt he couldn’t have another scholarship tied up by a player who wouldn’t be a contributor for next season and as a senior wouldn’t have any potential in the future.

Last night was the night to get the taxes done. Anyone know if you can just not pay the taxes owed and let the IRS simply take the money from that “economic stimulus” check? Just asking. So, I missed the always startling news of player discipline issues.

Pitt defensive back Sherod Murdock has been suspended indefinitely for disciplinary reasons. Athletic department spokesperson E.J. Borghetti said the school has no further comment on the incident, which led to his suspension.

Murdock is a 6-foot, 170-pound redshirt freshman from Tampa, Fla. He is competing for one of the reserve safety spots.

Never like to read any player getting in some trouble. The vague reason just furthers message board/comment speculation. Of course, cynicism says this isn’t particularly problematic since Murdock would only be a back-up most likely. Plus, the suspension will only cost him the Blue-Gold Spring game. Most likely he’ll be back for training camp in August.

This is more troubling.

Pitt starting left tackle Jason Pinkston is being investigated for his role in an altercation on campus over the weekend.

It’s a relatively specific issue: on-campus “altercation” (reading as: fight). Considering Pinkston has been out of spring drills as he recovers from his shoulder injury, this is not the way to help the rehab.

UPDATE: Per the Pitt News, this bit.

Pitt defensive back Sherod Murdock was involved in an incident at Sutherland Hall Saturday night, Pitt Vice Chancellor for Public Affairs Robert Hill confirmed.

Murdock was then suspended indefinitely from the football team yesterday for disciplinary reasons.

Pitt police responded to Sutherland at about 11 p.m. Saturday for “a disturbed, potentially violent person,” their log reported.

Hill said that Murdock’s suspension was connected to the incident, but added, “I had not said [this person and Murdock] were one in the same person.”

Um, and he didn’t say that he wasn’t. Sutherland Hall holds about 739 students and they were in lock down with this matter.

The police log said Pittsburgh medics transported the person to the hospital.

A UPMC Presbyterian operator confirmed Murdock had been in the hospital over the weekend and had been discharged. The operator would not give patient details other than name confirmation, including when the patient came to the hospital or when he was discharged.

Hill said one other member of the football team was involved in the incident, although his status on the team is not in question. The action, Hill said, is no longer under review.

Still, nebulous, but not good. No wonder EDSBS is looking to give Pitt some big points in the Fulmer Cup when this finally gets hashed out.

Some unconnected links.

A little late, but Rivals.com spring practice preview.

Pittsburgh missed playing in a bowl for the third consecutive season under Dave Wannstedt, but all signs point to 2008 being a turnaround year with recent recruiting classes coming to fruition. With other teams in the Big East in transition, Pitt could make a run at the league title. The Panthers need to settle on a new offensive line and find new starters at defensive line and in the secondary this spring.

A ranking of BE Coaches. Wannstedt comes in 6th. I understand Wanny being in the lower half based on what he’s done, but seeing Kragthorpe 4th and Leavitt 5th is ridiculous.  Kragthorpe may have a solid body of work prior to Louisville, but he can’t compare to what Leavitt has been doing. I can at least see the argument for nos. 1-3 (even if I don’t agree with the order — Edsall, Schiano, Kelly), but if body of work counts for Kragthorpe, Leavitt blows him out with how he’s built USF.

Joe Starkey writes that Pitt is embracing expectations on this team from national speculation.

“I’m kind of surprised,” says Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt, whose team began spring workouts Tuesday. “You know, coming off a five-win season.”

That said, Wannstedt welcomes the pressure. The Sporting News’ Matt Hayes and SI.com’s Stewart Mandel have Pitt pegged at No. 25; ESPN.com’s Mark Schlabach and CBS Sportsline’s Dennis Dodd at No. 22.

“We don’t dodge the issue,” Wannstedt said. “You meet it head on - but, really, it doesn’t have any bearing on anything. One of the early lessons you learn playing this game is that you have to prove yourself every week.”

There’s also some talk of the possible LeSean McCoy and the Heisman talk. Let’s make sure there’s an O-line first.

Finally, I mentioned that Rod Rutherford is in af2. In his debut, he threw for 4 TDs and ran for 2 more. Of course, in what had to take him back to his Pitt days the O-line let him get sacked 7 times and there was little defense as the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre Pioneers lost 48-41. Ah, memories.

There’s a Pitt legacy on the Wildcat’s squad.

Jason Richards of Davidson has a chance to match his father’s achievement of point-guarding a team to the Elite Eight. Tom Richards was in charge when Pitt got to the East final in 1974. His son, leading the nation in assists, kept the Wildcats’ offense viable with 20 points and five assists while All-American Stephen Curry gradually found his touch on the way to 30 points and a dismissal of No. 2 seed Georgetown.

We need to lighten up a little — let’s have some fun.

Solid.

[The Mosh Pitt]

This is a post I never expected to write. Definitely not something I want to write. Not now on the day of the NCAA Tourney. Not ever. This is the first time I have ever come across plagiarism.

One of the things I do regularly on this blog is aggregate Pitt content. Read and gather as much as I can then try and put it out there in a post with a common thread. Whether it is a game recap or a storyline that various media folk follow.

So, very late Sunday night/early Monday morning, I finally got to posting the various links I had gathered over the previous 24+ hours after Pitt won the Big East Tournament.

One of the links in that group was the short piece from Eric Hall at the Beaver County Times about how Dixon has earned and should stand alone from Ben Howland (EH-BCT). The time-stamp online was for 12:56 am on March 16.

On Monday afternoon, while gathering more stories I found this story from Dale Grndic on Scout.com (DG-S) which I just lumped in my tabs as “Dixon love” after a quick skim. That evening, when I had time to put together a new links round-up I took a closer look at the story and felt like I had already read it somewhere else.

I had.

EH-BCT:

If any doubt of Jamie Dixon’s coaching ability existed, it disappeared this week. If any part of his success was still being attributed to Ben Howland, it vanished Saturday.

Dixon’s fifth season as the Pitt Panthers’ coach has been his best. Better than the 31 wins of his first season. Better than the Sweet 16 of last season.

The Pitt Panthers are the Big East champions after Saturday’s 74-65 victory over No. 9 Georgetown. That’s a statement few could have imagined a few weeks ago.

For the better part of two months while dealing with injuries, Dixon kept the team together though its common thread was hanging by one. And now that the Panthers are primarily healthy, Dixon has the group believing and rolling heading into the NCAA Tournament.

DG-S:

It’s been questioned several times this season, but the phrase “Howland-Dixon Era” for the Pitt men’s basketball program should finally be vanquished.

Jamie Dixon, deep into his fifth season at Pittsburgh (26-9), certainly should stand alone now. Sure, Ben Howland, his mentor, brought back the Panthers program. Dixon certainly maintained that high level from the outset, but this arguably has been his best season.

That’s better than reaching 31 wins in his first season, 2003-04, and better than the Sweet Sixteen performance last spring. Pitt’s 74-65 win against ninth-ranked Georgetown earned Dixon his first Big East title. Howland won one in 2002, but the Panthers didn’t have to go through what this season’s group has.

For the better part of two months while dealing with injuries, Dixon kept the team together though its common thread was hanging by one. And now that the Panthers are primarily healthy, Dixon has the group believing in itself and playing its best basketball heading into the NCAA Tournament.

EH-BCT:

Dixon managed to unite this team just before it was prepared to dissolve and just before the most imperative portion of the season was set to begin. His in-game moves, often criticized, were for the most part tremendous. He out-coached the likes of Rick Pitino and Tom Crean and John Thompson III.

It’s an impressive list. Those coaches have all been to the Final Four.

Dixon showed he’s worthy of being mentioned in the same sentence as those coaches.

He also proved mentioning Howland’s name in the same sentence isn’t necessary any more.

DG-S:

Pitt could have fallen apart completely, but Dixon wouldn’t let it. His in-game moves, often criticized, were for the most part tremendous. He out-coached Rick Pitino, Tom Crean and John Thompson III in a three-day span. That’s quite an accomplishment. Pitino has a national title on his resume, while Thompson III was in the Final Four last spring. Crean got there before as well.

However, Dixon’s name should be mentioned during any conversation about top basketball coaches in the NCAA. Howland is in that category as well, for getting Pitt its initial Big East title and two NCAA Sweet Sixteen appearances, as well as what he has accomplished at UCLA.

In case you hadn’t figured it out, the bold print are where the sentences are virtually identical.

This had me stunned. Frankly, I was hoping that there was some sort of mistake with the by-lines. Grndic has done freelance work for the BCT in the past, so maybe there was a mistake with that.

After all, Dale Grdnic has been a sports reporter on Pittsburgh sports for years. He has covered all the sports teams in Pittsburgh. He has written a book on the Steelers. He’s quality and his peers think well of him.

I fired off an e-mail to Eric Hall late Monday night and set about trying to find and e-mail for Dale Grndic’s. I didn’t get it until the next day around noon. By that time, I had already heard from Hall who confirmed it was his story and knew nothing about the Grdnic piece until I had sent him the link. He was very surprised.

I got a response from Mr. Grdnic shortly after I sent the e-mail. He asked me to call him to discuss it. I wasn’t able to make a phone call until Wednesday, shortly after 9 am. There was no denial.

So, yes. Dale Grdnic did commit plagiarism. The reason. The excuses. The justifications are ultimately irrelevant. It was done, and Mr. Grndic will have to own what he has done.

I take no pleasure in this. Frankly, there’s a significant part of me that wishes I hadn’t found this. It would have been easier. It also would have been easier to let it slide. It wouldn’t, however, have been right.

(more…)

Don’t forget, Dennis has set up the 2008 Pitt Blather Bracket Challenge. Follow the link to the information to join Pitt Blather’s bracket.

The Selection Show came and went without much surprise regarding Pitt. They fell in the 4/5 range that was expected and the biggest gripe right now is the location — our first (and second) round games are all the way out in Denver. The full bracket can be found here.

The top four seeds in our region, the South:

1. Memphis
2. Texas
3. Stanford
4. Pitt

Compared to the other regions, ours is not the hardest (East) nor the easiest (West).

The first game will be on Thursday, and game time is expected to be released tomorrow. Oral Roberts is the opponent — one of the most obscure and least-known teams in the field this year. Potential match ups down the road (should we win, of course) are interesting to look at:

1. The the second round we would face the (5)Michigan State vs (12)Temple winner. The quick thought is a Pitt-MSU meeting, but don’t put it past the Spartans to lose to Temple. If they can lose to Penn State, why not to a team that actually wins a few games?

2. Top seeded Memphis will likely await the winner of the Denver pod. So much has been made of “Calapari is a better coach than Dixon, we should have hired him” so how about settling it on the court. Memphis runs up and down the floor as fast as anyone, opposite of Pitt’s methodical and slower paced style.

Don’t get me wrong though, I haven’t forgot about Bradley and Pacific. Let’s get past Oral Roberts first.

Sorry to be away for a couple days. With the conference tournaments and then the NCAA Tournament looming, I’ve been working on a bunch of things for FanHouse at AOL. Trying to get things ready on that end — and I’m not. Add in the usual offline chaos, and it’s been hard to get back to the mothership.

Media-wise, it doesn’t appear that there’s much new. There’s the recaps from the loss in Morgantown talking about the lack of defense, rebounding and players searching for answers.

There’s the sky is falling/no it isn’t stories regarding the NCAA Tournament.

There’s wondering about the bench struggles. Wondering why the team is suddenly just not playing well. And simply, what’s next?

When a team is struggling, I do understand the questioning of the coach and if he’s the right guy. I think the people now coming out 5 years later saying “we should have gotten Calipari,” have been waiting a while for another chance to complain about this. I find it kind of silly, since I think Calipari was mainly interested in using Pitt for another raise — as he usually does. It’s also worth noting the resentment many seem to have towards Dixon for being courted by Arizona State a couple years ago leading to a raise. Given how Calipari plays that game annually and often goes one better by getting his name floated for other gigs — I can’t even begin to guess the animosity he would have built as his salary is over $1.8 million these days.
Judging by the chat transcript, I’d say P-G beat reporter Ray Fittipaldo has gotten a bit sick of getting e-mails of how Pitt is on a downward spiral.

Ray Fittipaldo: I think people have become spoiled. Making the NCAA tournament is no longer a thrill. People expect it at the very least. The way things have gone the Sweet 16 has sort of become a run-of-the-mill occurrence. Like it or not, Pittsburgh is a city that has celebrated championships with all of its major sports teams. Pitt lives in the shadow of the Steelers, Penguins and Pirates (they’re still major, right?). People want to see Pitt take that next step. Dixon is charged with that responsibility. It’s not easy, but he and Ben Howland are the ones who created the expectations. I’m not saying it’s fair, but I think he realizes that coaching in a sports town like Pittsburgh there are certain expectations that fans have. It’s not a bad thing.

A program doesn’t just go up every year even when it is improving. There are steps back, and bumps (and injuries, can’t forget injuries). There were plenty who believed the program was going to go to seed after the 2004-05 season ended with a thud. The returning talent didn’t appear to measure up, and things were a mess.
The good news for Pitt is they have a needed break before the final home game — and senior day — against DePaul. Then a few more days before the BET. The team needs it (and I think we fans needed it as well).

I think sometimes we — as fans — get so wrapped up in what is or has happened in just a few day period that we lose sight of the full season. Expectations are fluid things. Going into the season, it was unsure. Pitt was ranked, but there were lots of questions. Some expected big things, others saw a transition season and others saw struggles for a very different looking team.
Pitt raised expectations in the non-con by going undefeated through most of December, including a huge win over Duke that only looked bigger further into the season. The cost, though, was the loss of starting small forward Mike Cook.

Cook was averaging over 10 points, was one of Pitt’s most athletic perimeter defenders and best free throw shooters. His loss was immediately felt in the Dayton loss immediately afterwards. Brian Roberts was able to take advantage of Cook’s absence, and torched Pitt. Dayton was also hyped and primed for this home game — from the players to the fans.

In addition, Pitt lost Levance Fields in the second half with a broken foot. Despite losing two starters, Pitt managed to go 8-4 without him (7-5 in the conference). In that period Pitt beat Georgetown and had a bad loss to Rutgers. The team did it with only 8 scholarship players — half of whom were freshmen or redshirt freshmen. by going back to the slow tempo, hard defense approach that was required without Fields and Cook. Pitt also had to be efficient on offense since the possessions will be limited — and a common theme in all the losses is that when Pitt didn’t shoot well and/or turned the ball over they lost. All of their losses had Pitt’s efficiency at 100.5 or lower — Duquesne, Duke and WVU were the only games where Pitt’s efficiency was horrible but Pitt won.

Levance Fields returned for the Marquette game, but he was not near where he was with only two days of regular practice under his belt. The blowout loss wasn’t on him, though, as Pitt just stunk. Yet it was still just one loss — no matter how bad.

Consider that Pitt has 3 “bad” losses. Either because of a poor opponent beating them soundly or being blown out: at Dayton (25 points), Rutgers (13) and at Marquette (18). How about other teams in the top-25?

Marquette (25/24) has 4 “bad” losses: at WVU (15), at Louisville (20), Louisville (24) and at UConn (16).

Notre Dame (21) has 2 bad losses: at Marquette (26) and at Georgetown (19).

Xavier (10/12) has 2: at Arizona State (22) and at Temple (19).

Texas (7) has 2: at Mizzou (13) and at Texas A&M (17).

Texas A&M (22) has 2 (and soon to be 3 after this Texas game right now): at Texas Tech (15) at K-State (21).

Vandy (20/16) has 3: at Tennessee (20), at Florida (22) at Ole’ Miss (16).

Michigan St. (19/17) has 3: at Iowa (7, but only scored 36 points), at Penn St. (9) and at Indiana (19).

Are any of these teams going to make the Final Four? I don’t see it. I do think all of these teams have a damn good chance of making the Sweet 16 and a few even to the Elite 8. If that happens, well then it comes down to match-ups and who has the big games.
Pitt had big questions going into the season about their flaws. Some were shown others not so much. It sucks that if Fields and Cook didn’t get hurt Pitt might have been a Final Four team, but that’s the way things go.

Pitt still has flaws, but so do most of the top-25 teams. Parity is very high right now. The good news, is that Pitt can get better as Levance Fields gets his game legs back.

It’s easier to be pessimistic, because you are rarely wrong.  I’m just not there with this team.