masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
September 10, 2019

A Look Back and a Look Forward

Filed under: Football,Uncategorized — Reed @ 4:27 pm

Well, hello again!

Chas has been gracious in his allowing me to get back to where it began as far as my writing about Pitt football and I’ll be posting some articles here on The Pitt Blather every so often.  So, here goes…

After a pretty dismal opening loss to ACC opponent Virginia Pitt hosted Mid-Atlantic Conference (MAC) Ohio at Heinz last Saturday. It wasn’t Ohio State mind you but Ohio…who actually isn’t all that bad of a team for a MAC school. Let’s set the stage a bit:

Against Virginia Pitt looked pretty shabby in just about every aspect of play. After VA moved out to a 13-0 lead Pitt had its only two decent drives, both in the 2nd quarter, to go ahead by one point, 14-13 at the half.  After that…nothing at all… while VA scored 17 unanswered points. Fans will have different opinions about how Pitt actually played in that game but regardless of how you break the game down it was a disappointment to those who thought we had a chance to start off the 2019 season on the right foot.

But that foot tripped over its other foot and we started 0-1 in ACC play.

Then last Saturday we seemed to play better. In many aspects we took a big leap ahead, especially in the passing game by our QB Kenny Pickett. What he did against VA was pretty horrid with 21/41 for 185 yards @ 4.5 yards per attempt & an 87.4 passer rating… and watching it unfold felt even worse. But he rebounded against Ohio in a big way by throwing for 26/37 for 321 yards @ 8.6 ypa and a 151.0 rating in a 20-10 victory.

Was that a big step in the direction of what our new OC Mark Whipple thinks we’ll see each week out of the passing game or was that a result of playing a MAC defense that was 99th in Passing Yards Allowed (3300 yards and 24 TDs) in 2018? Who knows, but it was better passing and receiving play and less sacks allowed by our Offensive Line then the week before so that bodes well. Our talented WRs didn’t drop as many passes in Week 2 as in Week 1 and that helped account for the big yardage jump also.

I don’t buy into the belief that we’ll see that same level of passing play we did last week as the norm for the rest of the season save for maybe against Delaware and a poorer ACC team. I certainly believe that our next opponent, Penn State, will put so much defensive pressure on Pickett we’ll see more of a reprise of the VA game then of what we saw in the Ohio match. I’m not taking Pickett’s accomplishment away from him, but hell folks, throwing for 321 yards and yet only one (1!) TD? He has to do better than that if we are to win Saturday and our conference games later in the season.

Regardless of if our passing game was effective or not we have kept up the poor work in the second half of our ball games scoring 0 points against VA and then only 3 points against Ohio.  This trend has been a killer for us – in our last five matches we have scored a total of nine points in the second half.  Nine points in 10 quarters of play.

Here’s how that broke down as far as points scored after the half going back and including the last three games (all losses) of 2018: Miami – 3 points; Clemson – 0; Stanford – 3; VA – 0 and Ohio – 3. Nice pattern but totally crap late and needed offensive play and a scoring difference of 49-9 2nd half points overall.

That is actually horrid and as a result we are 1-4 in those five games with the only win being against a lesser foe. That really bothers me for a variety of reasons but what jumps out most is the continued absence of effective halftime offensive adjustments by Narduzzi and his staff.

Our run game was a bit better against Ohio than it was against VA. In that first game the VA defense held us to 30 carries for 78 yards (2.6 ypc) and 1 TD. Ugh. We rebounded against the Bobcats with a better showing of 37 carries for 160 yards (4.3) and 1 TD also. Still not what we’d like to see against an FCS school, but better.

Looking at this season’s rushing so far at 67-238 @ 3.6 ypc and 2 TDs I very much doubt we’ll see anything like the rushing game we had last season this year – far from it maybe.

Penn State currently sits at 30th nationally in rushing defense giving up only 2.19 ypc and zero TDs. That said the Nitters haven’t played the schedule we have so far with their Idaho (79-7 win) and Buffalo (45-13 win) games.

What jumps out to me is that regardless of who PSU played they outscored their opponents 79-20 in averaging 62 ppg. I think they will score a bunch against us on Saturday also. The question therefore is ‘are we going to be able to keep pace with them?’ I don’t think we can enough to win the ballgame in Happy Valley with 106+ crazy fans screaming their lungs out. It will be our first away game and one that signifies which major PA team gets the last win in what may be a very long time before these two teams play again. Pitt dined out on our  2000 win until 2017 when we lost to the Bad Guys up in Blinders-on, PA.

Look at our record in the last three games against PSU; we are 1-2 and have been outscored 123-62 with a humiliating 51-6 loss last year. And we had a semi-decent team last season – better than the current 2019 version in my opinion, albeit with different approach offensively this go-round.

But Penn State is Penn State and when we won that last match against them we were fielding talent like QB Nate Peterman (3 TD passes), WR Q. Henderson (7 touches for 107 yards @ 15.0 ypt and 1 TD) and RB James Conner (146 yards total at 5.6 ypt and 2 TDs) on offense and an offensive line that was one of the best we have had in ages.

That OL gave us a 28th ranked rushing Offense along with a 3rd ranked Sacks Allowed at only 10 on the whole season. We have no offensives stars of that caliber on this squad – so far at least. Some kids shined against Ohio but we’ll see what they do against better competition.
This year’s version of the OL is a far cry from those of the past when we won 8 games and as such I feel Pickett will be running for his life on most of his drop backs on Saturday. That’s going to make a big difference in his passing stats and effectiveness.

I don’t have a crystal ball but I predicted a 1-3 start on the season by the Panthers and nothing I’ve seen has changed my mind on what will most probably happen in Happy Valley. I think PSU shuts down our run game, disrupts the passing game and scores on deep passes against us.

Penn State is now giving (-)17 points to Pitt according to the latest betting websites. I think that is just about correct but I’ll take even more PSU points so my prediction is:

PSU – 45
Pitt –  17





Commander,
So glad to see your first rate unbiased writing skills on the Blather once again!

Comment by Pittman4ever 09.10.19 @ 10:32 pm

Ditto Pittman4ever, a most welcome sight seeing Reed back on the Blather.

I had mixed feelings about Pitt opening with UVA rather than a non-P5 opponent before the season, but after adjusting to the loss, believe it was for the best. We learned that positive expectations for the defense were confirmed and the new offense was a work in progress. The first game certainly provided points of emphasis needing improvement.

We saw improvement in the offense during the game with Ohio. The OL and QB need continued improvement to be able to execute Whipple’s offense. Even with a sharp learning curve, there may not be the talent to score enough to beat PSU.

However, I do believe this Team is better than last year’s and this week’s game will be competitive.

Comment by StandfortheBand 09.11.19 @ 9:41 am

Like the post, Reed. Keep them coming. That two year look back does show that the players on that 2016 team seem much more talented. If Pitt cannot keep its offense on the field they are in big trouble. Even good defensive teams will wear down if they don’t get rest. As I mentioned previously, the lack of depth on the current Pitt roster causes the starters to play too many minutes which is a recipe for disaster…

Comment by VoiceofReason 09.11.19 @ 10:11 am

Finally! Glad to have a place (again) where reason and rational thought concerning our football team rules the day.

Sadly, I concur with your analysis. The last time I was excited and positive about the direction of this team was (3) years ago, following the win over PSU at Heinz Field.

Anybody with a critical eye could see where our recruiting was taking us and the results show it.

Since the end of the 2016 regular season (and starting with the bowl loss to Northwestern) Pitt is 13-16. If we subtract the two wins against FCS (I-AA) teams, that record drops to 11-16.

That’s right. Pitt has won 40% of it’s games against it’s peer group. And for those of you “our schedule is too hard” apologists, Pitt is only 9-8 in ACC play over that same period. The ACC folks. Not the Big 10. Not the SEC. Not even the Big 12. The ACC Coastal.

As for this weekend..

Panthers 10
Pedophiles 48

Comment by JayTowerA 09.11.19 @ 10:32 am

Can’t disagree with much of what was written above. It should be noted that in 2 of the final 3 losses of last season, we played against the 4th and 5th ranked defenses. And the opener this year was against last year’s 20th ranked defense that had 8 returning starters.

PSU also currently is ranked high defensively but rankings mean very little this time of year with most teams playing against easy competition. Nonetheless, the talent gap between the two teams is quite large as Pitt. along with 90% of D1 teams, cannot possibly keep up the top 15 programs for so many reasons.

I realize this is not what many people were want to read or acknowledge, but I can’t possibly see a reasonable argument against it.

And as far as high scores go …. last week’s game between LSU and Texas was billed as a battle of the DBUs …. Defensive Back University. And indeed LSU had two 5-stars that were among the top 2 DBS recruited the past two years. Still, Texas passed for >500 yards and scored 38 points. LSU passed for only 471 yards but scored 45.

Welcome to the world of modern footballl

Comment by wbb 09.11.19 @ 11:01 am

Guys – It looks like some comments have to be approved before they show up. I’ll touch base on here a bunch to do just that.

Thanks for reading – this will be fun.

Comment by Reed 09.11.19 @ 2:38 pm

The pedos had a much better team last year too, especially on offense when they had that jerk at QB. I also think we have a better defense than last year.

I think this game will be closer but still a loss. Of course it better be closer after losing by 45. Expect to see Franklin try to run up the score….he is the king of jerks.

Comment by Jackagain 09.11.19 @ 3:54 pm

^^^ Especially because this might be the last Pitt v PSU game for decades. He’ll score as many as possible, but if we are in that position PN would do the same.

Comment by Reed Kohberger 09.11.19 @ 4:24 pm

Reed, I wish I could disagree with you but history is on your side.

The only thing we have going for us is Narduzzi’s history of upsets in big games. Although the string was broken last year with the near miss vs. ND.

I am hoping we start a new string on Saturday, but I am afraid your assessment is more realistic.

Comment by gc 09.11.19 @ 4:41 pm

Back to your roots, with work and family Chas needs an assist, never enough sites for Pitt news and opinions, God knows we don’t get it from our local papers and media…

Comment by Pap76 09.11.19 @ 6:11 pm

Commander, great to hear from you again.

However, in your paragraph about the improvement in the running game, you incorrectly characterized the Bobcats as an FCS team. Not a fair qualifier.

Nevertheless, you are spot on with regard to the talent differential and that will undoubtedly carry the day with regard to the 100th match-up of the in-state PA rivals.

Comment by Taxing Matters 09.11.19 @ 7:19 pm

Dreams are what motivate me to get out of bed.
Winning the lottery; a Vicky Secret model on my doorstep; Roger Federer asking to play a set or two.
So, why can’t I dream about beating the cult, especially since we may never play them again in any of our lifetimes?
Now, let’s make it happen!
Of course, if I was inclined to participate in Fan Duel, I’d lay beaucoup bucks on the dreaded Nits.

Comment by Gasman 09.11.19 @ 7:22 pm

Reed, glad you will be contributing here, between work and family obligations I am sure Chas appreciates the help…

Comment by Pap76 09.12.19 @ 4:49 am

Been having email issues and for whatever reason my comments are not showing up. Hopefully this one does. Anyway Reed, glad you’ll be contributing here, with family and work obligations I’m sure Chas appreciates the assist…

Comment by Pap76 09.12.19 @ 5:11 am

Meanwhile….Pitt is a volleyball school

Comment by Steve1 09.12.19 @ 7:41 am

Maybe we’ll be a BB school in our HC’s 2nd season…

Comment by Reed Kohberger 09.12.19 @ 11:01 am

Here is a great article about Larry Fits passed to me by Pitt Gamecocks:

link to bannersociety.com

Comment by Reed Kohberger 09.13.19 @ 6:32 am

It’s gonna take a while to process just how disappointing this was.

Comment by 2$Chuck 09.14.19 @ 3:27 pm

I just finished watching Pitt play its third game against P.S.
My opinion after 3 games is coaching is terrible, defense remains better than any in ACC except Clemson. In the PSU game Picketmight be a servicable QB with a running attack. However the running attack that would have been modeled after Piits running game in the last few years, 220 and 230 RB’s has been replaced by 180 lb backs the Davis brothers. Play Sydell and Nas mis handled their best back # 5 in country moving him down the roster after he got hurt, Salaheddin, 225 lbs.who transferred. No more smash-mouth football, so Picktt will see plenty of blitzez and what talent he has will be left on the feild

Comment by Dennis Wagner 09.14.19 @ 6:03 pm

I don’t think HCPN is intellectually equipped for in-game decisions.
By the way, 9 second half points in the last six games.

Comment by Gasman 09.14.19 @ 6:55 pm

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter