masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
November 3, 2013

More of the Same

Filed under: Football — Chas @ 11:19 am

[EDITOR NOTE: Sorry about the site going down around halftime. The volume was overwhelming the hosting company’s shared server and took me offline until I could tweak some things. Hopefully it won’t happen again.]

Take your pick. O-line that is getting crushed. Quarterback that is terrified of getting hit many more times. Running backs not producing. Defense only showing up for one half of football (Aaron Donald, excepted). A huge breakdown on special teams. Backbreaking defensive surrender in a key 4th quarter moment.

This one had all the classics of the season in one game.

It’s not that anyone can say Pitt deserved to win. Yet, Georgia Tech has to be breathing a sigh of relief that they got away with so many missed chances, gave Pitt oppotunities, and still won. The Yellowjackets shot themselves in the foot repeatedly when they had chances to bury Pitt in the first half.

Pitt had chances with Georgia Tech leaving the door open. Pitt tripped going up the steps, smashed their face into the door frame, stumbled about and fell into the rose bush.

The one difference in this game was that the team came out horrid in the first half — on both sides of the ball — and played better in the second half.

In the first half the defense looked like a team facing the triple option for the first time. Not a team that played against the same offense a week earlier. The discipline was poor. The scheme was moronic.

Apparently someone passed that tip along to DC Matt House, and along with Aaron Donald’s absolutely amazing performance, the defense was excellent in the second half. Forcing a fumble and forcing GT into three 3-and-outs in the second half. But for that ridiculous 42 yard reception, Pitt’s defense was looking to pitch a second-half shutout.

Worth more than aside, but Aaron Donald. Wow. 11 tackles. 6 tackles for loss. 2 forced fumbles. 1 sack. The superlatives don’t do him justice. This was a tremendous game, but his consistent excellence all season has been lost at times. Only 4 (I would love to say 5, but I just can’t at the moment) games left to see him in a Pitt uniform.

Unfortunately, the extent of the offensive adjustments was a brief moment that led to a score and then more of the same nothingness. The season long streak remains intact: Pitt has failed to outscore a team in the second half.

Look, we all know the O-line isn’t particularly good. Nor is it deep. The injuries forced Dorian Johnson into his first start — and it showed. I’m hesitant to say that it is getting worse. The reality is, teams have more tape on the O-line. They can easily see the same weakness and exploits. And the defenses are doing so.

They know that the offense is stronger when it can stretch the field with the deep ball. But rather than worry about dropping extra guys into coverage, they are bringing the pressure knowing the O-line won’t be able to hold them long enough for the ball to get downfield. To some extent, there isn’t a lot Pitt can do to counter that.

Still the offense. As much blame goes on the O-line, Tom Savage is starting to look more and more like Rutgers sophomore Tom Savage. Nervous. Unsure. Scared to take more hits. He’s struggling to keep looking downfield when he is looking at the pass rush.

Odd thing. Despite Pitt’s “commitment to run” Pitt only gave the ball to the running backs 14 times against GT. In the VT loss it was 15. Even in the Navy game, when Pitt RBs took the ball 31 times, Pitt only ran it 7 times in the second half. It really seems that OC Joe Rudolph and HC Paul Chryst are quick to abandon the run.

The questions and problems are mounting. The team is now 4-4 and no one can look at the last 4 games and be certain Pitt will win at least 2 more. Can they? Sure. Do they have it in them at this point? I don’t know.





Good summary, Chas. btw, the site being down last night made me realize how important this site is to me. No other blog substitutes. Keep up the good work.

Comment by panther94 11.03.13 @ 11:34 am

That certainly says it all Chas. GT was essentially giving the game to us with turnovers etc. but we still couldn’t capitalize. That is very telling of this team. The will to win just isn’t there. Is it coaching or some other reason?

Comment by DJS 11.03.13 @ 11:43 am

Another classic for Pitt refusing to take the win being handed to them.

In a few months we can look forward to getting bounced in the first round of the ncaa tourney by the Davidson Wildcats. cant wait!!

Comment by Coach Ditka 11.03.13 @ 11:44 am

While the D played good in the 2nd half, they needed to hold GT to a FG attempt after the alley oop long pass.

They didn’t come close. The very next play the GT running back waltzed into the endzone, untouched pretty much from over 20 yards away.

Had they held GT to a FG it’s still only a 1 score game at 17-10.

So when it counted they folded, just like last week against Navy. Not to the extreme of last week, but nonetheless they ….folded.

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 11:52 am

“It really seems that OC Joe Rudolph and HC Paul Chryst are quick to abandon the run.”

Excellent point Chas, since that was supposed to be their forte at Wisconsin.

So it’s beginning to look like Bob Bostad who was the Running Game Coordinator and the O-Line coach at Wisky was the most valuable one and of course we didn’t get him. We got the stiffs !

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 11:57 am

A school’s image is important. As good as academics are to image, in today’s world 3 1/2 hours of free advertisement are more important.

Comment by Frank MD 11.03.13 @ 11:58 am

@Frank MD – when the overnight ratings come out, my guess is almost no one other than Pitt or GT fans were watching. That is certainly true once Florida State- Miami started at 8. Before that, I’ll bet more non-fans were watching Auburn Arkansas which was still in progress.

I don’t know if that’s good news that Pitt-GT wasn’t compelling enough to attract viewers but at least the audience was most likely not one which seeing our performance would change it’s perception of the University.

Comment by Pitt Dad 11.03.13 @ 12:10 pm

They might also never have tuned in at all preferring to watch Oklahoma State- Texas Tech, two top ten teams, whose game started the same time on Fox nationally.

Comment by Pitt Dad 11.03.13 @ 12:12 pm

sorry – top 25 teams

Comment by Pitt Dad 11.03.13 @ 12:12 pm

lol anybody that wasn’t at PITT/GT fan that was tuned in, certainly ….tuned out…

….after our grand offensive display of 1 yard of offense in the ENTIRE 1rst quarter.

Now mind you this after a week’s worth of game playing by these morons. A week’s worth of game planning resulted in…..1 total yard.

That says about it all !

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 12:23 pm

^that wasn’t a PITT/GT fan ^

need more coffee….

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 12:25 pm

Once again a lost in classic Pitt fashion! I know I should be getting use to these losts by now but they still make my blood pressure rise! Failing special teams – fake punt, huge kick/punt returns, poor kick returns on our part, and three times we cannot pin GT deep by angling the punt …fire the Special teams coach…Oh that is right we don’t have one! Finally, third and 17 and we go for the interception instead of knocking the ball down! Can’t wait to see how we lose the ND game!

Comment by PittSouthCarolina 11.03.13 @ 12:27 pm

Important to remember this always:

Good coaching can overcome average or even bad players.
Good players can never overcome average or bad coaching.

Pitt has average at best and bad at worst coaching.
I haven’t given up on PC but he has too many average or bad coaches for a first time HC

Comment by Pitt fan in Atlanta 11.03.13 @ 12:37 pm

They give up on the run because they have no confidence in the running backs.

Comment by alcofan 11.03.13 @ 12:44 pm

I am definitely in the minority here, but I was somewhat happy with the second half of the game, PITT’s defense really stepped up and played pretty well only allowing 7 points (on a drive which GT completed a 3rd and 17 jump ball) and then the first half they scored on the drive with the fake punt.

I also didn’t think Savage played that bad. When he has any time at all he completes his passes, and in the second half PITT moved the ball more. The running game is still nonexistent though.

other positives:
-Donald will be an All American
-Boyd has a big game for the first time in awhile
-They got the TE’s involved
-They are staying in games despite the OL being absolutely awful

Comment by rhyno527 11.03.13 @ 12:57 pm

or the o-line.

The Coach em ups are having a hard time coaching up a 4 star recruit (Biz) and a 5 star recruit (DJ)

Can’t wait to see the results with the MAC 2 stars.
🙂

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 12:57 pm

My point is that regardless of how many watched the game last night, if the team was better more would have watched. The better teams attract audience and that promotes the school. Pitt is in BAD need of promoting itself in athletics. I hope Pitt basketball continues. Alabama certainly promotes itself and is pays off in everything you can think of including recruit Foster. ND has its own network. Whoever heard of Oregon, yet some WPIAL kids wanted to go there.

Comment by Frank MD 11.03.13 @ 12:59 pm

also looking ahead to ND..

I think the ND game is a much better matchup for us

They went into the Navy game missing a couple DL players and two or three got hurt on top of that, while I think ND will move the ball on PITT fairly well, but If our OL blocks even at all, they can have some success on offense

Comment by rhyno527 11.03.13 @ 1:00 pm

Would you call that then….wait…

Coach em downs …..lol

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 1:00 pm

-8 yards rushing…beyond pathetic. This team is going to struggle to get 2 wins to be bowl eligible.

Comment by PITT it IS 11.03.13 @ 1:02 pm

The Domers have a history of pounding us in Pittsburgh sans Fraud’s year, in a battle of inept offenses.

They have let us win in 1999 in the last game ever at Pitt stadium. lol just because

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 1:04 pm

Syracuse is the only game we have chance of realistically winning. UNC did stink, but they’re getting better, have better athletes than us and they run the pistol option which is always something we have trouble with.

Cuse is better at the C-Dump and most likely they’ll play their best game of the season against us. (what else is new)

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 1:09 pm

Running back stats in inches per carry.

Comment by 66Goat 11.03.13 @ 2:21 pm

Yep, just like old times last night, found myself yelling at the top of my lungs at the TV again AND nobody named Tino was in sight. “YOU CAN’T ALLOW THAT BALL TO BE CAUGHT FOR CHRIST’S SAKE”!!!That 3rd and 17 was just absolutely unacceptable.

Still, as bad as we currently smell, with just a little luck going our way for a change and a few better efforts by our players on critical plays during the last two games, we actually could be 6-2 instead of 4-4 while trailing smoke and fire beginning a death spiral smack into the hard conclusion of our schedule. And that’s not the Koolaid talking.

Pitt usually has one game a season that, out of nowhere, we play a complete game on both sides of the ball and produce a win that has everybody scratching their heads wondering how the hell that just happened. Could it be our Prime Timer against the Domers this week? probably not, more likely we $hit the bed as usual on national TV, we seem to have that technique down pat but I’m showing up for this next game at least, even though I could have sold my season tickets on the 45 yard line for the price of half of my entire season ticket cost to some Irish jagoff follower for this one if I had the sense to do so.

Comment by Dr. Tom 11.03.13 @ 2:58 pm

The site went down at half time…oh….I thought I was kicked off here for sayin’ I was gonna watch the Pens game instead 🙂

Note to Vinopal: Look son, you have a 3 1/2″ vertical….next time just try to tip the pass away.

Comment by Jackagain 11.03.13 @ 3:09 pm

The D played better in the 2nd half, but still could not get the critical stop late in the game. That 8 minute 80 yard TD drive in the 4th iced the game for them.

Comment by 2$Chuck 11.03.13 @ 3:10 pm

Running back stats in inches per carry.

Comment by 66Goat 11.03.13 @ 2:21 pm

hahahahahahahahahahaha

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 3:26 pm

@ Jackagain

Everyone got booted for being meanies to chryst & staff.

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 3:29 pm

This team is getting worse!!! The scarypart is the roster for next year no qb no tailback and the same oline. Why was juantez hollins not put in the game. He wasnt an all american tackle but he surely could have done better than dorian.

Comment by zach 11.03.13 @ 4:25 pm

What a joke the recruiting stars rating system is. That may be the worst i ever saw a five star play. Hes got alot of improving to do.

Comment by zach 11.03.13 @ 4:28 pm

good points zach

Although I submit…..has gotten worse (past tense)
Yes Juantez Hollins good question? Didn’t want to post that earlier, waiting for SOMEONE ELSE to bring that up.

Food for thought, as the O-line hasn’t progressed, isn’t progressed, actually regressed since Duke, as we’ve seen Duke’s defense isn’t bad, only giving up 7 points to Navy and 10 to Va. Tech. This leads you to ask:

what in the fook has happened to this unit since the Duke game. Ga Tech was avg’g 1 sack per game had 5 and pressured twice that.

Just what is going on ??????
Huebner was with the NFL Vikes for

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 4:42 pm

a so so head coach can do well if he has good asst coachs but a so so head coach will look like a fool if has bad asst coachs and we have just one good asst coach are WR coach all outhers should be fired or quit.
becuse you see chryst is just a so so coach and even less than that once the game starts
foget the recruiting it is poor coaching which kills us.

Comment by FRANKCAN 11.03.13 @ 4:48 pm

Although I am really glad almost the entire Hueber family is picking up paychecks at PITT.

Hueber and his wife Nancy have four children: sons Jeffrey, Jonathan and Joseph, and daughter Kristy. Joe Hueber is a football recruiting assistant with the Panthers, while Kristy works in the Pitt ticket office.

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 4:49 pm

@ Frankie

Even a so-so head coach calls for a review of the Vinopal interception against Navy. Since they were driving for a TD. That play was a game changing momentum swing type of play.

Can’t think on his feet. Maybe up in the box under no pressure, but not on his feet.

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 4:54 pm

i dont know why you thought we would win the game any way did you forget it is a pitt football team we dont win hard games hell we dont even win easy games not with these jokers for coachs the asst coachs were not hired becuse they were good they were hired becuse they were frends of frends or knew some one from wisncon not becuse they were really good at there job then you wonder why we lose wake up poor coaching is killing us.

Comment by FRANKCAN 11.03.13 @ 4:57 pm

EMel you are so right he is a POOR coach but he will be here 2 more years they dont dare fire him even if we go 10 and 2.
but if the AD had balls or cared which he does not hr could make him hire new asst and fire some old ones but he wont.

Comment by FRANKCAN 11.03.13 @ 5:02 pm

@ FRank

I’m afraid we’re going to have hit ‘rock bottom’ ala 1966-1969 and then again in 1970 before we have any chance of a major program shaking shakeup.

And for us long timers, that may be the best route, because continual 6-6 or 7-5 or 5-7 seasons aren’t going to cause that major shakeup to occur. Which is much needed.

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 5:11 pm

crap meant 1971…we were 6-5 in 1970 i think

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 5:12 pm

And I think we have the coach in place to lead us to……’rock bottom’.

Although it will be the next guy, like Majors 2 that will really suffer. (after the last Paul genius OC wrecked the program) (history is repeating itself, exactly 20 years later, truly amazing)

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 5:16 pm

EMel look at john majors staff his asst coachs and the asst coachs from are glory years and look at are asst coachs now.
hell there were future NFL coachs on thoes staffs and some will be hall of fame coachs some day and put them next to are staff now and you will see why we will go no were now.

Comment by FRANKCAN 11.03.13 @ 5:24 pm

Put this on the coaches. It is understandable to lose to FSU and good teams. Someone is going to have to make a good argument that Navy and Georgia Tech have more talent on the field. I was behind the bench, and we get a penalty AFTER a timeout for too many people on the field. That is because that idiot Palermo was yelling for players to go on, then yelling for them to come off. If one sorry episode sums up the state of things -= it is when the Tech punter runs around the end and no one is even in the picture. Guess we will have to spread the blame on the staff around on that one since no one is in control.

People want to all out players by name, but I rest my case on Duke. Your telling me Duke’s coaching staff has won these games with superior talent?

Teams are heading one of two directions at this point – either they are getting better or going backwards. We are going backwards. The offensive line is terrible and I lay a lot of it on what we are asking them to do.

A friend of mine at Tech says he knows exactly how we feel about defense. For years they have struggled with “bend but don’t break” and precise gap control crap. This year they have Ted Roof with arguably worse talent – they blitz, they move, they disguise coverage, they play more aggressively.

I do not blame Savage, if I had taken as many punches as Rocky Balboa I’d be gun shy too. But, couldn’t we throw Voytek in for a series or two and roll out, run a QB draw, maybe just pitch the ball on a sweep just for a change of pace?

This ends badly if PC does not upgrade the assistant coaching staff in the off season and also get with some other college coaches to do some things differently. We are so predictable it is boring. I think he should keep Rudolph and tell him he has the latitude to add some wrinkles. The rest of them I’d clean house on.

Comment by PittMan 11.03.13 @ 5:40 pm

Rock bottom as a program ive hit rock bottom ad a fan i demand peterson to be fired. Listen i agreed with firing wanny to get an upgrade we havent upgraded hes had 3 tries. Ciny hires tommy t pitt hires freddy cruger fraud graham and charley chapman chryst the mime football coach. Change the direction of this program or lose the 20000 loyal fans that are left.

Comment by zach 11.03.13 @ 5:42 pm

Pitt man ur comments r spot on

Comment by zach 11.03.13 @ 5:44 pm

dont waste your time if you want chryst fired it wont happen at least for 2 more years.
but if you are loud enough and keep trying you might get 2 or 3 new asst coachs.
but forget the dump chryst stuff he is here for at least 2 more years you can bet on it.

Comment by FRANKCAN 11.03.13 @ 6:02 pm

ND – Pitt 8 pm ABC

Chryst big chance.

Comment by Frank MD 11.03.13 @ 6:24 pm

Walt harris as o cord russ grimm o line coach greg schiano d cord buddy morris as strengh coach

Comment by zach 11.03.13 @ 6:46 pm

Someone must be poisoning the water down at the South Side practice facility….both Pitt and the Steelers coaching staffs are among the dumbest in the land.

Comment by Jackagain 11.03.13 @ 9:41 pm

How about both the Panthers and the Steelers have given up 55 points in a game in the same season.

For us it’s nothing that new, but I think I read that was the MOST points the Steelers have EVER given up or it was back in the 50’s.

Still can’t believe we won that game 58-55 against Duke. I think if we replayed that now, we’d get killed.

Comment by EMel 11.03.13 @ 11:53 pm

This is getting bad. Really think Chryst may be a dud. Not sure how this program can withstand another coaching change? With the sanctions on the Nits and a move to the ACC, Pitt had a golden opportunity and is pissing it away. Hope this team can rebound and finish the season and recruiting strong, but just don’t see that happening

Comment by Pap76 11.04.13 @ 1:22 am

I could pile on regarding the O-line and the complete lack of speed with our RBs (neither should be starting for an FBS team) or the way special teams loses us another game. (CHRYST HIRING A SPECIAL TEAMS COORDINATOR DAMN IT ALL!)

But, instead I’ll focus on the positive. Matt House has recieved his fair share of criticism, from me and everyone else. But the D has actually played pretty well recently. I forget which of the postgame write ups it was in, but in the last 5 games opposing teams are only averaging a shade over 18 points per game. Not too shabby. AD is obviously a big part of that. But House and his Defense have improved quite a bit and they deserve at least a little recognition. Keep up the good work.

Comment by PittHW 11.04.13 @ 2:08 pm

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter