masthead.jpg

February 19, 2013

Problems All Over

Filed under: Basketball — Chas @ 11:51 am

I guess it worked out that I didn’t get a chance to do a recap of the loss to Marquette. It would have been completely wrong and looked pollyanaish in the cruel light of the Notre Dame debacle. I would have called it just one of those games. Marquette was hot. Even Marquette’s own coach said that they played their best game of the season. They were at home. There’s a reason they had won 23 in a row at home. Pointed out Ohio St. getting blitzed at Wisconsin the next day.  Yada, yada, yada.

Dead wrong.

The ND game was Pitt’s worst game of the year. Near the end of the game, ESPN panned over to Coach Jamie Dixon and you could see him visibly seething. I’ve never seen him so openly pissed at his own squad while a game was still happening. At officials, sure, but never at his own team.

It was present right after the game ended.

But this might have been the most inconsolable Dixon has been after a loss. He could barely speak for a long time after Pitt blew a 19-3 lead by playing some of the worst basketball since the Ralph Willard days.

“Sorry you had to see that,” Dixon muttered to a friend as he left the court after his postgame radio show.

And it carried over to his post game press conference.

PantherLair posted video from Dixon’s presser if you want to look for yourself. He just kept looking down at the box score. As if he couldn’t believe the numbers he was seeing.

Once again, Pitt was outrebounded, and as I’ve stated I don’t buy into rebounding differential. I do accept the idea that rebounding margin on this team is an indicator of effort and hustle. And from that perspective, it was damning. Especially in allowing offensive rebounds.

Even when Notre Dame was missing every shot to start the game. Even as they were turning the ball over. They were getting offensive rebounds. They were getting more chances. They went after it harder and stronger than Pitt.

We can talk about the foul calls suddenly picking up after Brey’s technical. Or how it fired up the Domers. Or how two quick Zanna shots and misses went the other way for 6 points.

It’s just that suddenly this team is not the same. The energy is low. The focus is off. Execution. Everything.

“Our offensive efficiency numbers had been terrific,” Dixon said. “This put an end to that.”

Pitt shot 35 percent from the field and only made six baskets in the final 17:54, and two of those came in the final 1:22 when the game was already decided.

“We played selfish,” senior guard Tray Woodall said. “We’re a team that passes the ball, but our assist numbers and rebounding numbers indicate how selfish we played. We have to find ourselves, look at ourselves.”

Pitt had 10 assists on 16 field goals and got hammered on the backboards, 40-25. The Panthers entered the game the top rebounding team in the conference, but the Irish continually crashed the boards with success and tracked down almost every loose ball. The 15-rebound deficit was by far the largest of the season against Pitt.

“We’ve been drilling it, talking about it,” Dixon said. “Our losses have had a common denominator. That’s where we came up short in our seven losses.”

Not to mention not making a single three-point shot the entire game. Lamar Patterson, the best 3-point shooter on the team didn’t take one. Passing up on them, and plenty of other shots. Patterson chose a hell of a game to have a funk. Durand Johnson was sent home with a stomach flu. (And honestly, I keep hoping it is revealed that the whole team has it. That would explain a lot more of the performances.)

Considering how Patterson spoke before the game about wanting to win at home. About hating to lose at home, his effort seems that much more unbelievable.

No one it seemed wanted to shoot. No one wanted to rebound. No one wanted to play. There was poor effort to help in the second half. Everyone was in their own funk. Or as Woodall put it, selfishness.

That’s selfish also, to be open and not shoot the ball,” Woodall said. “That’s selfish, too. You have to take what the defense gives you.”

Dixon has said all season many of his players are too unselfish and he agreed that hurt his team Monday night.

“We have some guys who are too unselfish,” Dixon said. “We got tight. As the game went on we passed some open shots and ended up throwing up a guarded shot. That makes your offense incredibly inconsistent. We never got in a rhythm where we were finding guys and getting guys shots.”

I mean, Cam Wright ended up taking the second-most shots last night. It wasn’t because he was just hoisting them. It was no one else was. Wright also led the team in assists with 3. I like Cam Wright — off the bench, as a cog on this team — but he should not be taking more shots than Patterson and Adams and even Moore. He certainly shouldn’t have as many assists as Woodall, Patterson and Robinson combined.

Zanna has no confidence in his shot. Robinson and Zeigler are afraid of taking shots from outside, because they aren’t good shooters. J.J. Moore wants to shoot outside but is horrible at it, and is not finishing strong on the occasions he is driving to the hoop.

This is still the same team that looked to be getting better at the right time. Making progress and growing. We won’t know until Sunday if this is the sort of attitude adjustment they have to make in the face of the losses. Or if this team has something else wrong with it.





When you feel uneasy with a 19-3 lead you KNOW something is seriously wrong. That lead probably could have been doubled if Pitt had done anything rightor exerted any effort in the 1st half. The 2nd half was just doomed.

Bad week — I wish there would be more focus on day to day and less talk about regular season BE title. We won’t beat the late season bottom feeders on our schedule with that effort.

Comment by Ghost of Hornman 02.19.13 @ 12:05 pm

Pitt needs a couple of guys who can shoot
the three ball. This team is not that talented
There aren’t any Wannamakers, Fields,
Blairs, or Youngs. Unfortunate Durand
missed the game. He will take the open
shot. A lousy game on offense is
understandable. However was shocked
the cheats from ND out rebounded us
on the offensive glass.

Comment by JR 02.19.13 @ 12:19 pm

Can someone explain to me the lack of low post touches that Adams gets? It appears that on many occasions he has his defender sealed off well and the perimeter players refuse to send it into the post area, giving Adams the opportunity to work for a high percentage shot or kick back out to the perimeter for more open looks in the mid range game. What is the incentive for Adams to work hard to get good position if there is little to no chance he will touch the ball? How is he to develop his game within the context of our “offense” if he rarely sees the ball – except for rebounds?

Comment by Outlaw 02.19.13 @ 12:25 pm

I agree with Outlaw. We need to have our guards push the ball inside. Jamie should sit any guard that does not do this.

Comment by Pittfan17 02.19.13 @ 12:37 pm

Outlaw, I’ve noticed that also. He has position and they swing the ball to the opposite side. You have to reward him for working hard to establish position.

Comment by Pittastic 02.19.13 @ 12:38 pm

They went to Adams two straight times at one point and he fumbled/lost the ball, allowing it to get stripped. I’m fine with getting him even more involved but there’s 10 worse problems than how many touches he’s receiving.

As flexible as Pitt’s rotation is, I thought it was handles poorly at times last night. It’s really bad when Ziegler, Wright, and Robinson are out there together (esp. w/ Zanna at the 4) because there’s virtually no outside threat. As poorly as Patterson played, either he or Woodall need to always be out there to extend the defense a bit.

But really, trying to pinpoint specific reasons from last night is futile — there wasn’t a single element to be proud of other than maybe the first 10-12 minutes defensively.

Comment by JW 02.19.13 @ 12:39 pm

Outlaw, that’s been this team’s MO for at least several years now. Blair got the vast majority of his touches on rebounds.

Comment by Carmen 02.19.13 @ 12:39 pm

This team really counts on Patterson and Woodall to make shots and assists. When one has an off night they struggle, when they both have an off night, they are done.

Everyone recognizes the problems at the four. Taylor may not be the answer, but a few minutes could not hurt.

I agree with Wbb that Moore is no four, did he play much 3 last night, I only saw the end of the game. With Durand out did he back up Patterson?

Comment by gc 02.19.13 @ 12:41 pm

Outlaw, What you say is true, but when they got the ball into Adams, he turned it over. He also mishandled two passes that should have been easy buckets. Yes we need shooters, but we also need guys to be able to finish inside. This was a horrible performance by everyone involved. How do you allow a team that starts the game 1 for 19, to shoot a higher percentage than you do?

Comment by Justinian 02.19.13 @ 12:41 pm

ND started that first-half run when that Ziegler, Wright, Robinson line up out there. I was yelling (to my wife) “They have no outside threat at all right now. This is a terrible line up. ND can just pack it in.”

Comment by Carmen 02.19.13 @ 12:42 pm

There seems to be a theme, make no 3′s, we get beat with ease.

Comment by gc 02.19.13 @ 12:43 pm

Carmen, I was going to say the same thing. DeJuan Blair got his opportunities from off of the glass. The big difference was that DeJuan was a great finisher.

Comment by Justinian 02.19.13 @ 12:48 pm

Should we have played more zone in this game? Would it have made a difference?

Comment by Pittfan17 02.19.13 @ 1:01 pm

This game sucks no doubt. It also makes the next one vital. If PITT wins out (which they can and should)they would finish 12-6 in the conference. Not bad at all.

If they lose one though they would finish 11-7. Which just perceptually looks way worse than 12-6. Get this win Sunday on the road at SJU, stay in the top 25. Win out, and end up with a 5 seed in the tournament. Lunardis projections has PITT as a 6 seed as of today, so a 5 is certainly do-able.

HTP

Comment by Julius Page's Headband 02.19.13 @ 1:23 pm

“You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.”

Comment by Dan 02.19.13 @ 1:30 pm

The biggest thing I saw last night was how sluggish everyone looked, which affects defense, rebounding, shooting, etc. Are the legs gone already and season isn’t over? Or is it attitude?

Comment by gdodson 02.19.13 @ 1:32 pm

Please stop the Hedge! Every time Adams goes out to Hedge the ball carrier, he loses rebounding position. If rebounding is one of Dixon’s keys to success, maintain position! Hedging has little to no effect on opponent’s ball movement that I can see. Not Adams’ fault by any means, he is doing what he is coached to do. Teams are seeing it and getting good position, and offensive boards that come with solid rebounding position.

Comment by CAS '85 02.19.13 @ 1:32 pm

I may not be able to see the St. John’s game. Considering the way the Pitt Panthers are playing right now, that’s probably a good thing.

Comment by Justinian 02.19.13 @ 1:37 pm

“Barzini is dead. So is Phillip Tattaglia. Moe Greene. Stracci. Cuneo. Today I settled all family business so don’t tell me that you’re innocent. Admit what you did.”

Comment by Pitt Dad 02.19.13 @ 1:40 pm

Have to admit I felt uneasy with that lead too. We really should have lead by almost 30 points the way ND was bombing. You just knew they weren’t going to stay that cold all night. I kept tallying the possible scores in my head…two three pointers here and suddnely its a little close…. and sure enough the Pitt collapse began. I can’t quite put my finger on it but Pitt has not been Pitt the last two or three years. there seems to be no leader, no mental toughness and no willing to work hard for the tough win. The better recruits we get the lower we seem to sink. Its time to go back to the streets of New York and find some gamers.

Comment by Coach Ditka 02.19.13 @ 1:40 pm

Coach Ditka, Amen, well stated!

Comment by Justinian 02.19.13 @ 1:50 pm

Durand Johnson being out had at least something to do withour our poor shooting, which in turn had something to do with our loss.

The stats dont reflect this dramatically, though they do somewhat bear out what I saw – which is that we can not handles a strong and mature front court. Fortunately, there are not many to face in the NCAA this year. But both Marquette and ND have them, and both really took it to us.

The one silver lining though — Adams taking the ball practically coast-to-coast ending it with a finger roll. That was awesome and something no center in Pitt history was capable of doing.

Comment by PantherP 02.19.13 @ 1:51 pm

From Jeremy Lundblad – Numbers to Know on ESPN.com

Ugly Stat of the Night — Pittsburgh Panthers

The Panthers went 0-for-8 from 3-point range and had a season-low scoring output in a 51-42 loss to Notre Dame. It was Pittsburgh’s fewest points as a ranked team since 2007. Pitt is the only ranked team with a scoreless night beyond the arc this season, and it’s happened to them twice, both at home. The Panthers hadn’t previously failed to hit a 3 at home since 1998.

Comment by Pitt Dad 02.19.13 @ 1:51 pm

I agee with Outlaw that Adams need to get more touches. As for JWs comment that he lost the ball twice when they did go to him, my observation is the pass arrived much too late. I can’t tell you how many times over the past couple of weeks I see Adams with great position and I’m screaming at the TV to get hime the ball. The guards need to recognize he’s open much earlier. If they do that, the “fumbles” will go away.

Comment by midwest panther 02.19.13 @ 2:02 pm

I think clearly is now the time to start Adams and Taylor as the 5 and 4 and bring in Zanna to give them a blow. This would certainly improve our rebounding capabilities and give Adams more support. Also, Taylor shoots easily as well as Zanna does from 15 ft. out. Besides, Taylor is a senior so either use him or lose him.

Comment by pittman4ever 02.19.13 @ 2:18 pm

I’ve been saying for a while now that Adams and Taylor should be on the floor together. Taylor has developed a nice short range shot and can hit FTs. If he can pass, when the defensive bigs fall off to double team Taylor, Adams should be wide open.

“It’s not personal, Sonny. It’s strictly business.”

Comment by Pitt Dad 02.19.13 @ 2:23 pm

Timing is everything with the low post entry pass. One of the times Adams fumbled the ball was when Woodall attempted to drive and threw the bounce pass at Adams’ feet. Well timed entries into the post will result in scoring opportunities as it forces the double team and extra rotations when the ball is kicked out of the post (similar to what kills us on defense when we play Villanova, Marquette, Notre Dame, etc, etc.).

Comment by Outlaw 02.19.13 @ 2:33 pm

@Pitt Dad, LOL!!! About time for both of them to be on, several nights in a row that is!!! Ha Ha Never considered III part of it. I and II only!!

Comment by Dan 02.19.13 @ 2:41 pm

@Coach Ditka!! Absolutely.

He wasn’t the greatest shooter, the greatest passer, or the greatest dribbler, but I’d take a Carl Krauser right about now, pounding his wrists together doing his Bronx thing, yelling into the sky, or Chevy pounding his chest.

None of that the past two years.

Comment by Dan 02.19.13 @ 2:44 pm

Typical coach speak after a game:

“I am sorry. What happened to your TEAM was business. I have much respect for your TEAM. But your TEAM, his thinking is old-fashioned. You must understand why I had to do that.”

Huggins speech after a game:

“You sonofabitch, do you know who I am? I’m BOB HUGGINS! I made my bones when you were going out with cheerleaders.”

Comment by Pitt Dad 02.19.13 @ 2:56 pm

LOL!!!

Comment by Dan 02.19.13 @ 3:02 pm

What the hell was that last night? That was too embarrassing. It was as embarrassing as the Todd Graham Iowa debacle. That’s right- THIS WAS A FRAUD GRAHAM LIKE PERFORMANCE. This “ten deep” theory does us no good. Not one player can take over a game. Our entire team has to be on to win, and that is too hard to do. It’s especially hard when no one gives a crap. Providence is not a good team, but they could BEAT Pitt any night of the week anywhere because they have a couple of guys that can take over a game.

This is something completely typical for Pitt in the modern era of college athletics. We’ve seen this same jaw dropping crap over and over with these Pitt programs for decades now. We could all sit her and list them. And then I read that, after months, Chryst decides to give up and promote House to D.C. WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON AROUND HERE? WHERE THE HELL AM I AND HOW DID I GET HERE? I’m sick. I can’t take it anymore.

Comment by Get the Glory 02.19.13 @ 3:19 pm

How many chairs do you think Bobby Knight would have thrown across the court last night if he were coaching Pitt?

Comment by JJ 02.19.13 @ 3:20 pm

was at the game too. Agree with Dan’s summary. nice defensive effort lost in probably the worst offensive display by a Pitt team since the Pete opened for business. A reality check after the last two games: We badly need a change at the 4 spot. Zanna does not deserve to start. Its either JJ or Sleepy and both options are been thoroughly critiqued on here, but Zanna is soft and does not deserve the minutes he gets (24 last night). Jamie needs to make that move now.

Adams is young & raw but your only NBA player out there. His sweet 10 ft jumper early on and the 2nd half coast to coast finger roll layin with two defenders on him are nice signs of things to come. Fights hard for position but the guards get him the ball too late.He does mishandle a few, but he’s your star in the making. He needs to play more minutes (21 last night). Sleepy contributes on offense but gets run over on D like Zanna. No tough power forward on the roster, unlike past clubs. Still like Robinson. the kid has guts and made a nice reverse layup in traffic when we were still in it late. But this team has no go-to outside shooter and it hurt badly last night. Read where its the first time since 1998 Pitt has not hit a single 3 in a game!

Not with the Miller Time crowd or giving up on the season, but if Jamie doesn’t make adjustments and go with his best players with more minutes, we’ll be hard pressed to win more than 1 game in each of the tournaments ahead.

Comment by Bossdaws 02.19.13 @ 3:26 pm

JJ, Bob Knight would have benched all five guys on the court and let them sit, just as a matter of principle.

A few years ago, a sport writer refered to the Pitt team with Jaron Brown, Julius Page, and company, as a team of piano carriers. I really liked that team. I think this team better fits that description.

Comment by Justinian 02.19.13 @ 3:37 pm

Justinian, during the game, Dixon did as close as he could to benching all 5 guys on the court. He subbed in 4 players at once, aka the whole bench.

Comment by Wardapalooza 02.19.13 @ 4:14 pm

I guarantee you we would be better at fundamentals if BK was our coach. We would definitely know how to feed the post.

Comment by JJ 02.19.13 @ 4:15 pm

I will say that the one and only highlight last night was watching Adams’ steal followed by his ballhandling for 3/4s of the court through two defenders for a finger roll layup. Hopefully a sign of greater highlights yet to come from the big guy.

Comment by Pitt Dad 02.19.13 @ 4:17 pm

Just watched the tape a second time and it was a chore to even watch it live last night.

Wanted to hone in on the post play of Adams and why he was not getting fed in-time when he posted up. Answer was same as Marguette. ND actullay encouraged Adams to post up and let him have position easily quite a few times. Once the ball was entered to him, he was immediately double teamed by the off post player, either Kaufman (who had at least 4 unchallanged 8 footers/how does that happen?) or Cooley. This was by design and many of you would say “so what”. But the double started happening long before the ball was in any position to be entered.

Here’s the kicker, like Marquette, ND left the 4 wide open on at least 7 occasions..knowing Zanna and Moore would either not shoot or miss (or make no offensive move at all, just tossing the ball back to a guard).
It was like playing 5 against 6.

Again, I was furious with Patterson (amongst a host of others) not taking the wide open 3 but if you go back and look, they had a double team on Adams and again the 4 for Pitt was standing there wide f;’n open! Patterson saw this and thought he had an easy assist each time, so he drove the lane,and either started to pass to the 4 or actually did pass to the 4 who made no offensive move at all…so he had to throw up a prayer or pass it back out. Pitt fell for this over and over and over. ND suckered Pitt into bad play after bad play because of the lack of any talent at the 4.

Last but not least to EMel and all those others (which is most of this bloggosphere) who intimately know basketball…the number 1 fault I saw at both Marquette and ND was the lack of any offensive ball fake move by the player (other than Woodall who pump fakes to no one half the time)when they received a pass.

Classic fundamentals of basketball. If you get the ball and don’t at least fake a shot (or give the d player any reason to think you might shoot) the d will slough off you and your offense will simply not run. That, and the abundence of Pitt standing around on the off side of an offensive play (basically going “hey look at me I am open for a three!}and Pitt not being able to throw a “skip pass” (skip pass means you skip throwing the ball to your next closest player and throw accross the entire group) to save their lives, just kept the offense (can we use another word for offense?) moving like molasses.

I am NOT watching the tape again. Unless Jamie fixes the 4 position, no matter what he does, we will find ourselves offensively challanged the rest of the year.

He’s no dummy and I think the utter shock of last night will move Taylor to the 4. He has few other moves left.

Comment by Dan 72 02.19.13 @ 4:22 pm

The only highlights I want to see of Adams is him dominating a Final Four opponent. We’ve nothing else to accomplish in a regular season.

Comment by Get the Glory 02.19.13 @ 4:25 pm

Bob Smizek on the FAN this afternoon said the reason Pitt lost was because they “did not make enough baskets”

He’s probably pissed because Ron Cook got his Pitt hatchet piece out first. The two have a rivalry going constantly to see who can bash Pitt the most. Pitt sure gives them plenty of material.

Comment by Dan 72 02.19.13 @ 4:54 pm

Cook still has his head up JoePa’s ass. How could he have even seen the game to comment. Right now, Pitt is looking more like an 8 seed setting up a match against the #1 seed in the second tourney game. This game was almost as bad as the Sun Bowl debacle.

Comment by TX Panther 02.19.13 @ 5:11 pm

If Pitt continues their poor play, they we will be lucky to get an NCAA bid. Forget about seeding. It seems the players just don’t care if they win, so why should we?

Comment by MariettaMike 02.19.13 @ 5:29 pm

After watching this game I can’t believe that out of 27,000 students that these are the 10 best basketball players.

Comment by JLE 02.19.13 @ 5:32 pm

Holy crap. This team is 20-7, 8-6 in conference. Of the 6 losses, only 1 (Rutgers) is to a team that wasn’t ranked either when we played them or now. Yeah the last two games they looked like a middle school JV team out there but you can’t deny that, on the whole, this season is a vast improvement over last.

Comment by Pitt Dad 02.19.13 @ 5:40 pm

And the 7th loss is to a team that hasn’t been outside the top 5 all season and even that was a winnable game.

Comment by Pitt Dad 02.19.13 @ 5:40 pm

I was there. Pitt did not move on offense and got pushed around like scared little girls in the paint. Why don’t we go inside to Adams? Because he does not know how to post up that’s why. Zanna can’t hit a barn. Moore almost missed the floor on his first jumper and no one, I mean no one hustled.
Cook was right. He might have his head up paternos ass, but even that did not obscure his view of totally pathetic basketball.
Pitt will get crushed by ST johns. There is no reason to expect that a team that showed no heart and no hustle against ND will change it’s spots.
Know why Dixon was so forlorn after the game? Because he saw players that didn’t try.
He might leave after this season; before his stock falls.

Comment by SFPitt 02.19.13 @ 5:49 pm

Whatever the problem, they have to get their act together quickly. If Pitt drops the game at St. John’s that will be 3 consecutive losses. They still have to play Villanova again and DePaul. Despite the lopsided win over DePaul the last time Pitt played them,they’ve taken Notre Dame to overtime twice since that game.

Comment by Justinian 02.19.13 @ 5:56 pm

Has Dixon lost this team? This team plays this way because I don’t think there is a player that can truly lead consistently. There is really only so much a coach can do. The players need to begin disciplining themselves. Code Red. Pitt fans can’t handle the truth.

Comment by TX Panther 02.19.13 @ 6:00 pm

I doubt we beat the Johnnies at MSG, unless Coach shakes up the starting lineup.

You’re not getting much if any production from the 1 spot, the 4 spot and the 5 spot. Ok, so you don’t won’t take Kiwi Steve off the court, because of his potential and more importantly we don’t have a viable alternative, as Sleepy is a defensive nightmare at the 5. So that leaves benching Zanna (who’s mostly be worthless since after the first 3 BigEast games) and JR (who doesn’t provide any outside shooting, isn’t very effective driving and his previous attribute of assists, isn’t there anymore as teams play off him and drop back into the passing lanes.

So I would start Woodall (only because again we don’t have many options), either Zeigler or Durand Durand at the 2, Patterson at 3, Sleepy at the 4 (again not many options) and Kiwi Steve at the 5.

Got to do something to shake this team up, and generate some more offense. As you have to get more production from the 1 spot and the 4 spot.

Make the changes NOW, so that by BE Tourney Time, and more importantly the Big Dance, they will have played together and had a chance to gel.

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 6:07 pm

Right now this team is gutless, heartless, and spineless, Jamie does’nt seem able to light a fire under their asses.

Comment by Moe Greene 02.19.13 @ 6:09 pm

Actually I thought they were better when Durand Durand was getting more minutes and Wright didn’t play at all.

What the heck was he getting 23 minutes last nite ??

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 6:11 pm

Here’s one for ya….just read this tripe over at Panther Prey from some guy named Tony: (other than degrading folks here I agree with his post…LOL)

Tony February 19, 2013 at 3:49 PM
I am beginning to think some of these posters are really Steve Pederson. Believing showing up at Heinz and having faith will bring victories is so inane only a homer for the AD could come up with it. Criticize Doke for being negative means that you have a personal investment in keeping the status quo – which if you haven’t noticed – is a cut about mediocre. We want analysis on this board, not blind, pro Pitt crap. Take that over to pittblather where a number of guys follow Steve Pederson like little lap dogs. Chryst had a losing record last season and several times his team didn’t even show up. So you want to have blind faith in that? Get off your knees and start thinking.”

Comment by Jackagain 02.19.13 @ 6:13 pm

Have no clue why after a 4 game winning streak after the crappy 1-3 start, that Dixon felt obliged to reinsert Wright back into the rotation.

The game that both Durand Durand and Zeigler both had good games and then the next game Zeigler led the team in scoring off the bench, I thought they had turned the corner and found 2 players to make them much better. Then all of sudden, their minutes got reduced again and they both became non-factors again. And Pitt’s offense became it’s previous sputtering self.

I suggest Coach starts playing the aforementioned twosome again, immediately.

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 6:16 pm

@jackagain

lol I do believe we have several ppl or at least several blogger ID’s that are from the AD’s office, posting here.

Either that or they haven’t witnessed the futility of Pitt football over the last 30 years, or they are incredibly naive.

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 6:19 pm

Seriously I don’t know how anyone with any sense of logic or rationale can defend the promotion of House to DC.

And saying something like ;;;Give the guy a chance…is not a rational or logical defense.

That’s a wish based purely on hope.

Let me guess…Hope & Change.

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 6:25 pm

Is Pitt Dad Steve Pederson?

Comment by Dan 72 02.19.13 @ 6:29 pm

@Dan 72

Agree with your assessment, Zanna has become clueless at the 4 and is basically a waste of a position out there, he gets a few offensive rebounds, but he doesn’t know what to do with it anyway after he gets them. It either becomes another missed shot or a turnover.

Got to get him off the court, if Sleepy isn’t the answer at the 4, you could move Patterson to 4 and maybe Durand Durand can play the 3 or Moore.
Moore is a better 3 than 4 for sure.

Anything would be better than Zanna at this point, as you say…we’re playing 4 against 5.

Also think as I posted above, got to get more production or at least have the threat of a guy hitting a shot from the 1 spot. As they’re laying off him and he’s become pretty much useless as well. And a defensive liability. Can save him for late in game if we have a lead, cause he can hit free throws, so he can contribute that way.

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 6:40 pm

I will say that the one and only highlight last night was watching Adams’ steal followed by his ballhandling for 3/4s of the court through two defenders for a finger roll layup. Hopefully a sign of greater highlights yet to come from the big guy.

Comment by Pitt Dad 02.19.13 @ 4:17 pm

That was a phenomenal play and showed the athleticism and talent of Kiwi Steve.
Ok so how do you use this unique athleticism for a 7 footer ??

You have to isolate him one on one against the opposing Center. Which means you have to clear one side of the court against a Man defense, with Adams on that side and everyone else on the other side. You get him the ball, everyone clears out and let Adams go one on one, face up. If an opposing player leaves his man to double team Adams, that PITT player (who’s defender left him) immediately vectors to the hoop and should have an uncontested dunk/layup.

Another way to use Kiwi Steve’s unique athleticism, ball handling and speed for a big man, is to try to get him into those positions in transition offense. We have seen glimpses of this in small portions in a couple games.
This is one of his big strengths. Where he is weak now and maybe for quite a while, maybe forever is playing with his back to the basket.
Sleepy has never gotten much better since Day 1 with playing with his back to the basket. Some guys obviously can’t.

Adams is much better playing face up. So why not try to get him in those positions where he can play ‘face up’. I think his potential is unlimited but most of it will be unrealized if he’s forced into the traditional plodding 7 footer’s role of playing with his back to the basket. Why does he have to be Aaron Gray ?

I can envision Kiwi Steve being more like another very mobile, athletic 7 footer. A guy named Dirk Nowitski. They say Steve has an incredible shooting range and I believe it. We’re not going to see that if he’s stuck in the middle of the paint waiting for passes that never come that lead to him getting less than 5 shot attempts per game.

Wow I wish I had the opportunity to coach a kid with his enormous talent. The options would be limitless in what you could do with him to really make defending him & PITT an absolute nightmare for opponents.

You have to get outside this staid thinking of everyone that’s 7 foot tall has to play like Aaron Gray.

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 7:05 pm

Zanna has pulled this choke 3 years in a row, dominates against the cupcakes as hides in the corner against the big boys. If you hit him on his first shot he is done.
Robinson has to shoot better if he can not he needs to sit, between him and Zanna we are getting nothing and allowing the defense to concentrate on the others.
Sleepy needs to start.

Comment by Jimbo 02.19.13 @ 7:08 pm

We should support House as the DC … because he’s Chryst man, and Chryst is the head coach of Pitt!

And there is rationale to back that up as well, as posted in the ‘to the House’ thread this afternoon so won’t repost here were the focus is BB.

Comment by Pittscript 02.19.13 @ 7:27 pm

Worst game in Pitt bb history, probably the atomic blowout of the Panthers by Ohio State in 1959-1960 (my freshman year) 95-49. Yep, Jerry Lucas was the big guy on the floor for the Buckeyes.

Last night’s loss, however, felt almost as bad to me because this team has far more talent than the
motly crew that was coached by Ralph Timmons.
In addition, Ohio State was really good…the same can not be said for the Domers. We just plain stunk…and the talk about Elite 8 and Sweet 16 is a Koolade Cocktail.

Comment by isnore 02.19.13 @ 7:32 pm

Just saw on Panther Lair (rivals) that Coach is interested in this kid.

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/basketball/recruiting/player/_/id/171634/josh-hearlihy

Seriously,…….

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 7:34 pm

Emel – you are very correct about the 1. Robinson has to be more selfish and take his shots. He has good form and should be a decent shooter. If you take away the one and the four, it’s no wonder we are offensively challanged. Woodall is not quick enough to play the 1 against good defenders.

What a mess this all is!

Comment by Dan 72 02.19.13 @ 7:35 pm

@isnore.

I think it was Bob Timmons wasn’t it. And the star of the team was my mom’s doctor.

The great Don Hennon. Or maybe he graduated in ’58.

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 7:36 pm

Hennon graduated in ’59 one season prior to the atomic blowout….one of the best small players in basketball history…5′ 8” or 5′ 9”.

Hennon had talent, heart and brains (he became a surgeon)

Comment by isnore 02.19.13 @ 7:42 pm

Bob Timmons…Ralph Willard my bad.

Comment by isnore 02.19.13 @ 7:44 pm

@Dan 72

Yes indeed a real mess. When you get almost nothing from the 4 & the 1 spots,and not much from the 5, it puts lots of extra pressure on the two remaining spots to produce offense. That of course being Woodie & Patterson.

Patterson who had his best game of the year on Saturday as far as points scored….was a No Show last nite with a measly 2 points.

Pitt’s pretty easy to defend, as the 4 and the 1, you don’t have to defend. And nobody seems to be able to make very good entry passes into Adams which is why I suggest moving him out to a wing, you can get him the ball much easier, then clear out that side of the court and let him do his thing.

I know Jaimie is in love with the inside/outside thing, but that is not working with this set of players. So ditch it. Forcing them to do something they’re not equipped to do is just making them more unsure of themselves and wrecking their confidence. You have to put ppl or players in positions that give them the best chance for success. Right now we’re putting them in the best positions for failure. Or the worst positions for success.

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 7:49 pm

20-7 sounds impressive.

Break it down.

12-0 vs very suspect competition

8-7 vs real competition.

Yes it’s better than last year’s fiasco. But we have added three (3) Top 100 players since last year (Adams, Zeigler & JR), so you would expect it to be a little better…right. And Adams was rated as the 2nd best center last year in the country. Also we’ve had Woodie for the whole year, whereas last year when he got injured, the team went into the dumpster.

In effect right now, we have a average team, in a down year for the BigEast. They still play the same system as they did, when they hardly had any talent at all in 2001-2003. However back then we use to get lots of easy layups for the frontcourt.
However that worked I don’t know, but it did. lol

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 8:01 pm

Easy to blame the Pitt players… but face facts. ND was the better team. Much better center… much better at PF. 3 better – though any local high school team has a better 3 than Patterson. Guards of ND once they got on-track were better.

Pitt lost to the better team. And they will continue to lose… probably 2/4 and then finish the season w/ the usual first round BE tourney loss and first round loss in the NCAA.

Dixon needs to go.

Comment by John Ramella 02.19.13 @ 8:28 pm

Actually looking back at the ’02 & ’03 teams, both teams had 5 players that scored in double figures and the ’03 team had a 6th player at 9.8 ppg.

This team therefore is the 2nd most offensively challenged of any PITT team since 2001. After last year of course.

When we have to play nothing but halfcourt offense this team really struggles to score.

So it would be better to play less halfcourt as teams that actually have a 4 and a 1 are always going to beat us. You could even see that in narrow wins over two rent-a-win teams that had a good 4 and a good 1. Detroit & Oakland.

Either they speed up the tempo and press more to hide the deficiencies of the halfcourt. Or it will be a long next month imo.

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 8:47 pm

On 2nd thought, last year’s team could score better than this year, they just couldn’t defend anyone.

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 8:49 pm

Emel – agree with most everything but it is now impossible for Coach Dixon to change his d or offnese. The only thing he can fix is the 4.

I suspect a great many are watching Indiana vs MSU tonight. Izzo is the best coach in the country. He may not win this game but he makes in game adjustments that would take most coaches 2 weeks of practice to impliment. Second best is the guy from Butler. Just amazed at the way both teams react and adjust. Neither tries to play just one system.

No intended shot at Jamie here. The “meatgrinder” he runs fits the talent/or lack thereof that is available.

Comment by Dan 72 02.19.13 @ 9:15 pm

EMel i am not saying it is i am just asking
is it miller time yet.

Comment by FRANKCAN 02.19.13 @ 9:28 pm

Missed you yesterday FRANKCAN…the hire of House just started my day off on a very bad note.

Again with Pitt, one step forward, two steps back.

Comment by Dan 72 02.19.13 @ 9:36 pm

DAN 72wish you and EMel were on the house post to day go over and see how they riped me a new one when i posted that dockish said pitt did not want to be big time in football you would have thought
i killed there first born go read it.

Comment by FRANKCAN 02.19.13 @ 9:44 pm

info for you just when i thought it was safe to go back in the water that is from a movie.
HERE we go agein rumor is big 10 is looking to expamsion once more.
they say north carolina has a offer on the table and GT .
it is posted in several places check it out.

Comment by FRANKCAN 02.19.13 @ 10:14 pm

WHY this could be the real deal the big 12 commissioner said we could be proactive on expansion

so what does that mean well it means if big 10
belives them than they want first pick before
the big 12 makes its move.

so they go to north carolina and GT knowing every one will end up at 16 soon
it is all there hope it is wrong but read the posts.

Comment by FRANKCAN 02.19.13 @ 10:38 pm

@Frankcan

Only if we had a better coach committed to coming.
Not another DW firing with no plan whatsoever.

As far as UNC & the Big 10, I posted this before, the Tarheel Radio Network run weekly football show, spent the majority of each weekly broadcast bashing ACC football. Which I found extremely strange for a radio show that was supposed to be PROMOTING ACC football.

They even ridiculed the ACC’s 4-2 bowl record, which wasn’t bad at all. So I would say, since this show was run by the Tarheel radio network, they were “laying the groundwork” for a reason to leave the conf.

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 10:51 pm

What if we get to the ACC

and everyone of worth has “left the party”.

Sort of like arriving late at a Frat Party and all the better looking girls were already picked over.

That would be…..just like PITT !

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 10:54 pm

ben cornfield of game day has posted that it is official north carolina has a offer to go to big 10
EMel it will be ok we still get the 17 millon per year we could be in big east with 2 million per year

and you know what i think NC says no but some one else might say yes.

Comment by FRANKCAN 02.19.13 @ 11:03 pm

@Dan72

Well it’s not like they haven’t played a little uptempo, transition offense in the past. Cause they have, he’s just not committed to it.

He was the same way with his abhorrence of playing zone, and he’s playing it a lot more this season than ever before. So there’s that….

So I will continue to hold some hope that he realizes that most of the players on this team play better in transition than half court including ALL the bigs…….

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 11:05 pm

@EMel and Frankcan – so if UNC and VA leave, we can invite UConn and GTown and start rebuilding the old Big East.

@Dan 72 – LMAO. No. I’m not Steve Pederson (but I have met him). And I’m not affiliated with the Athletic Department (except for my annual contributions to the Pitt Band).

However, if I were Steve P, I would immediately bring back Script Pitt and the 70s color scheme.

Comment by Pitt Dad 02.19.13 @ 11:08 pm

EMel i read your post abought the radio show
i think it was 2 weeks ago you could be right
it could be the ground work to leave.

Comment by FRANKCAN 02.19.13 @ 11:08 pm

@ Frank

Yea but if UNC leaves, FSU & Clemson are sure to go to and maybe Duke. Weakens basketball tremendously and football too.

We get stuck playing in a watered down version of the ACC, basically BigEast2 against the likes of Wake Forest, L-Ville, Uconn (would be added), probably USF too, NC State, UVA. Blah

Hope the Pitt Admin, has some sort of contingency plan in case everyone of worth starts leaving the ACC. Like call up TExas and say,,,,remember when….

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 11:09 pm

pitt dad no u con and cincy but yes it would seam like the old big east you hit that nail on the head

Comment by FRANKCAN 02.19.13 @ 11:12 pm

Yes, I listened to it every week, it was called:
‘This Week in the ACC’. Only later did I find out it was produced by the Tarheel Network after doing a little research.

There would be no reason to bash your own football conference week in and week out unless there was some reason to do so. Since that would be counterproductive to your OWN football program.

UNC basketball is coincidentally down this year as well, so they don’t look as scary as they usually are to the B1G.

Comment by EMel 02.19.13 @ 11:15 pm

EMel you could be right but just look at the 17 milliom that is at least a plus.
better then 2 million.

Comment by FRANKCAN 02.19.13 @ 11:16 pm

EMel dont worry abought the BB as you pointd out in this post we look to be on the way down hill in that.
so it wont make a diff in a waterdown ACC ANY WAY.

Comment by FRANKCAN 02.19.13 @ 11:33 pm

Anyone remember the internet bubble of the 90s? The housing bubble of the 2000s? Remember how those ended? Cable TV (invented in the 50s to get TV signals to coal country in eastern PA where the mountains blocked their antennas) is a dying distribution model and the high fees being paid to these “conferences” will not be sustainable for long. What happens as televisioin viewership becomes more a la carte? We already have close to a dozen internet streaming sites. I’d worry less about what conference we’re in and more about building a nationwide fan base (requires winning, no?) so that our “product” is valuable irrespective of our alliances with other content providers (university athletic departments). Or, we could form a new Ivy League and say that athletics exists as an outlet for students – to compete with their peers – and nothing more. I’m good either way.

Comment by Pitt Dad 02.19.13 @ 11:38 pm

UNC to the Big Ten? That is the silliest shit I have ever heard. The BTN must be a gold mine.

I’d be happy with a Pitt, Cuse, Cincy, UCONN, Louisville conference. Pick up the three or four best ones left and have a round robin in football and a full home and home in basketball. Can the ACC keep the full contract with five less members?

Comment by Chris 02.20.13 @ 12:02 am

chris if 2 leave and than 2 outhers they would only be loseing 4 if they lose any.
if you get cincy and u con that would replace the first 2 and ucf and say tulane just for kicks they would still have 14 so yes we would still get the money till end of contract which is 10 years i think

Comment by FRANKCAN 02.20.13 @ 12:18 am

Silly Chris, most definitely. But in ConferencePalooza nothing makes sense.

Missouri was playing in Starksville, Mississippi the other nite. And soon Rutgers will be playing Iowa and Minnesota in football. lol

The Big 10 is basically waving heaps of money in front of everyone and hopes that university says goodbye to all tradition and everything else that made that university unique in sports.

Big 10 & Delaney is the like the devil incarnate of college sports. I really hope like Pitt Dad mentioned cable TV goes ala-carte and the Big 10 falls flat on it’s collective face. Cause they do produce an inferior… vastly overated football product and to an extent, basketball product as well.

Forgot that Devil Delaney is a UNC alumnus, so there’s that in the equation as well.
He’s not content until he’s completed destroyed college sports. Because what makes college sports unique and desirable is it’s traditions.
And this power driven control freak is doing his best to destroy it.

Comment by EMel 02.20.13 @ 12:31 am

lol FRankcan

That’s all Stevie Cornhole needs is an extra 15 million per year to fiddle diddle away.

You ain’t seen nothing yet

Comment by EMel 02.20.13 @ 12:34 am

SB nation now reporting the offer is to virginia and north carolina and they could have it done on monday.
this is bad for the ACC if it comes to pass
but good for U CON AND CINCY
and if it does the big east will really be dead this time
there will be no big east how could it go on.

Comment by FRANKCAN 02.20.13 @ 12:39 am

College sports are a joke anymore. All this expansion for more money. But why? It’s not more money for the students, its more money for a few that benefit from a system of free labor. And spare me the BS about the athletes getting a free education. As if education comes into the equation, in a world where you are forcing your kids all over the country for games and where kids won’t be on campus for days. Pryor gets free tattoos and you’d think the world was ending. But conferences make pure money grabs and no one blinks. Its all a joke anymore. I wish I had gone to one of the small liberal arts schools, then I wouldn’t have to care at all.

Comment by Wardapalooza 02.20.13 @ 1:05 am

Any speculation about North Carolina leaving the ACC is fantasy. The Big Fish in the ACC is North Carolina and they like being king. Also they are very parochial in their outlook. There is no way they would ever leave to play 2nd fiddle to Ohio State and Michigan in the Big Ten.

Comment by Justinian 02.20.13 @ 7:23 am

I just hope that Swofford doesn’t pussy out like the BE did against WVU’s lawsuit where they were allowed to accept a much lower buyout and got leave ASAP. It is essential that Maryland absorbs the full buyout amount or a terrible precedent will be set.

Comment by wbb 02.20.13 @ 7:43 am

The sports network bubble cannot continue for too much longer, because the cable subscribers are not happy paying for contentent they really don’t want. Delaney didn’t want Pitt in the Big Ten, even though Penn State did, because the people in Pennsylvania were already paying the fee for the Big Ten network. By adding markets in New Jersey and Maryland,the additional cable charge in those markets, for the Big Ten Network would be added to everyone’s bill. There is only so much the market can bear before it crashes. The expansion can’t go on indefinately.

Comment by Justinian 02.20.13 @ 8:37 am

@EMEL, Smug Smile Steve, contigency plan, ha ha ha!!!! That’s funny stuff.

Also, yesterday, someone on here had me howling all day. I can’t find the comment or who it was, but it was something like this……

“look, we know Dixon doesn’t like to recruit kids who can shoot, but….”

The sarcasm was dripping all over the floor!!! LOL

Comment by Dan 02.20.13 @ 10:08 am

People won’t believe me, and won’t think anyone is capable, but, I know myself, and I’m completely capable.

Take Pitt out of the equation, and take any Pitt being left out of the party, out of the equation.

Purely as a college football and basketball fan, this whole expansion business has ruined the fabric of the sports.

Not all of it, mind you, just the latest.

I could understand teams unhappy with Texas, and the Big 12 situation. I could even understand the Big 10 getting Nebraska, they needed an even number.

The beginning of the end for me, was the Big Ten poaching of Rutgers and Maryland.

Look, college athletics the last 40 years has been all about the money, we all know that.

They’ve always been sluts and hookers, nothing new there.

They’re all just full blown whores now. That’s all. Just whores. Nothing more.

North Carolina v. Minnesota in football?? WTF is that???

Virginia v. Iowa???

Rutgers v. Illinois???

Pitt will still play football, against someone, somewhere.

As a college football fan, Illinois is supposed to play Northwestern and Mich St.

Iowa v. Minnesota

N.Carolina v. Wake Forest

UVA v. Maryland

Geography, geography, geography.

WVU, not even taking a shot at our rivals. Rivalry totally taken out of my thoughts.

What in the effin’ world is WVU doing playing Texas, Texas Tech and Iowa State in conference games??? Think about that.

A couple years ago, I posted a lot, just about what Pitt has to do, to get saved and have a chair when the music stopped.

I can honestly say, if the UNC, UVA thing goes down, I could really care less anymore.

Not being emotional either. When you take the geography out of the games, then what does it really matter anymore.

Not an old fuddy duddy longing for the Big Eight and Eastern Independents.

I understand progress.

I also understand going to far with progress, and sometimes going overboard.

Just because you progress, doesn’t mean it’s good progression.

Comment by Dan 02.20.13 @ 10:54 am

There are good things if UNC and FSU go. ACC becomes less central and control spreads to other schools. FSU is about athletics and nothing else. Both schools have no TV market. We know Cincy and UCONN and they have markets. GT is second fiddle to GA and the Falcons. VA has no market except some in DC.

Comment by Frank MD 02.20.13 @ 11:10 am

@Frank MD. You always have great comments, and I think we agree most of the time.

One thing on this one. Conventional Wisdom says, that if Big 10 goes to 16, then Big 12 will make a play to become one of the Big 4.

Taking Clemson, Louisville, Miami et al.

Then Va. Tech and NC St. would go to SEC for them to have 16.

I mean who knows, it’s all BS with a little bit of substance, but how do you know which is which???

Also, if it starts breaking down, there is always the famous, if the Pac 12 sees them all going to 16, then they make a grab for TX, TX TECH, Okie and Okie St.

Then does the Big 12 fall apart and the ACC could survive by taking some of them.

My biggest disgust, is, I would like them to go ahead and get it all over with, and leave the teams in the conferences, where ever they may be for 10 or 20 years.

Comment by Dan 02.20.13 @ 11:18 am

Actually, that’s my 2nd biggest “disgust”. Geography is 1st.

And now thinking as a Pitt fan, if they go to 4 conferences of 16, will Pitt be one of the 64 or will be now relegated to a “second tier” conference a’la Big East, Conf USA, Mntn West?

Comment by Dan 02.20.13 @ 11:24 am

Yes better to stay as is but these conference commissioners have BIG egos, want big pay checks and want to leave a legacy. Hopefully schools wake up and tell them to shove it.

Comment by Frank MD 02.20.13 @ 11:28 am

It is obvious that Zanna is now a Zombie and a assest to the opposition. We are not coaches but were also not blind. It is also obvious, froms stats that Taylor is a far better rebounder than Zanna and operating down low against most strong forwards in thhe league rather than bigger centers should have less problems finishing-actually should cause match-up problems. If needed play a zone on defense. Perhaps 3-2 zone.

Comment by pittisit 02.20.13 @ 11:46 am

Pitt falls apart every year. EVERY YEAR. Last year it was early in non conference play. Prior years it was the NCAA tourny (well documented as we all know). This year it appears to be happening now.

Comment by Get the Glory 02.20.13 @ 12:24 pm

Two comments:

I can’t see North Carolina leaving the ACC. They are king of the conference and they like being king. If Virginia goes who cares?

I would like to see Dante Taylor get playing time at the 4 spot.

Comment by Justinian 02.20.13 @ 3:01 pm

I dont know if anyone else saw this article, but I found it pretty interesting in light of current circumstances. Enjoy…

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/8959324/college-basketball-scoring-problem-west-liberty-university-coach-jim-crutchfield

Comment by ECH 02.20.13 @ 3:28 pm

thanks for that article……

I’ve been wondering when folks would start realizing just how miserable college ball has become.

No post play, ugly offenses with too much high ball screen focus, and one-and-done players who never develop.

It’s getting rougher and rougher to be a fan…..

Comment by hugh green 02.20.13 @ 4:29 pm

interesting to here from Patterson about the rebounding problems”we got big guys Steve and Zanna we should handle the boards. Insight perhaps to why it seems that Adams seems alone against 4 opposition rebounders.
Our gurads and forwards may have a mind set that lets get down the court and run while steve gets the rebound.
Pitts success on the boards was that it committed 5 players to the boards on defense. I have seen too many many long rebounds were the oppositions guards got the ball about the foul line while Woodall and company were not blocking out their man.
Rebounding is a five man game. Blair success was that Biggs and Young gave him space. Zanna never blocks out his man nor does Patterson.
This is crap and Dixon ought to tell them their playing time now depends on how many offensive rebounds their man gets.

Comment by pittisit 02.20.13 @ 4:34 pm

aFFIRMATIVE hugh green

College Basketball stinks anymore, most of the players lack basic fundamentals. If the rules were enforced, (carrying the ball, palming, traveling, etc,) it would be even worse. Roy Williams even mentioned this in his weekly radio show the other nite.

What is being valued more these days is just basic athleticism over all everything else.

Sorry but I don’t really care how high they jump and how awesome they throw down a dunk. whoop whoop.

I’d like to see some semblance of teams that have the basic fundamentals down, that they should have had down in jr. high in the first place and I’d love to see a well coached team. And that doesn’t mean overcoached, where one substitutes and substitutes with no effect at all on the game other than that of no cohesion or flow to the game at all.

I do realize it must be very frustrating coaching these kids today.

Comment by EMel 02.20.13 @ 7:55 pm

Pitts success on the boards was that it committed 5 players to the boards on defense. I have seen too many many long rebounds were the oppositions guards got the ball about the foul line while Woodall and company were not blocking out their man.
Rebounding is a five man game.
Comment by pittisit 02.20.13 @ 4:34 pm

Agree pittisit,

Where this team has trouble on the defensive boards is teams with a good 4 & 5 and on long rebounds. JR is not a particularly quick guard and is not to good on chasing down long rebounds.
Woodie is better but doesn’t like blocking out his man, as he sometimes get pinballed around.

As far as the bigs not blocking out their men, this must happen in practice as well, since Zanna has never learned this. And it carries over in the game. Sleepy is more of an offensive rebounder as well, so it’s almost a team thing.

Hopefully Kiwi Steve doesn’t pick up on their bad habits on defensive rebounds.

Comment by EMel 02.20.13 @ 8:02 pm

College basketball does not stink. Pitt does. I think the point was well made above – Pitt is 8-7 against real basketball teams. The 20-7 record is a sham. As is our coaching. Dixon’s best seasons are behind him, and those were pretty much dominated by underachievement.

Things may be bad now, but when Adams gets drafted after this season, I cannot imagine what crap Dixon will have on the front line next year for our first stint in the ACC. The only upside is that we will be losing Travon Woodall. And we will have another year of Lamar “don’t look at me for rebounds” Patterson.

I give our chances in the ACC in football much better than basketball. What a freaking joke this program has become. Thank god Syracuse is joining the ACC also. At least there will be one team Dixon can beat.

Comment by PO'd Panther 02.20.13 @ 10:35 pm

Pitt needs to look outside of its natural recruiting grounds for fundamentally sound basketball players. N.Y. and Philly have great atheletes but players that seem to have no basketball mentality or fundamentals.
There has to be someone who would like to come to Pitt who could shot over 40% from the field.
There are not many self-motivated players like Sam Young who made himself into a shooter.
If they do not have the mechanics and shooters mentality (confidence) when they hit campus who is going to work with them Brandon Knight.

Comment by pittisit 02.21.13 @ 12:38 pm

PO’d ,Although we have struggled to meet high expectations Jamie Dixon has presided over the most successful decade in Pitt basketball history.To say his teams were,” dominated by underachievement” is a gross distortion of fact and at the risk of sounding insensitive pure horse dung.Our program might be facing some struggles but we are not,”a joke” as you insist.I suggest that your strong contempt for Patterson and Woodall is way too strongly stated as well.We had one bad year in the last decade,and the jury is still out on this one.Do you have anger issues?

Comment by spiritofsection22 02.22.13 @ 4:17 pm

PO’d ,At the risk of angering those Pitt faithful who count themselves among those who actually believe. God starts with a big G for obvious reasons.You wouldn’t want PO anybody.

Comment by spiritofsection22 02.22.13 @ 5:18 pm

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com