I swear, some time soon I will get to the actual games. Maybe even talk about ND before Saturday. Yet I can’t turn away from Conference Expansiopocolypse stuff. I’m just too invested.
The Big East football programs had a little get together at a hotel in NYC. Henry Kissinger happened to be in the same hotel. You really can’t make this stuff up.
Speaking of stuff you can’t make up. This was the full text of the Big East Conference statement after the meeting.
Our membership met this evening and we are committed as a conference to recruit top level BCS caliber institutions with strong athletic and academic histories and traditions. We have been approached by a number of such institutions and will pursue all of our options to make the BIG EAST Conference stronger than it has ever been in both basketball and football.
What a reaffirming and warm statement. But…
Curiously absent from the league statement is the specific wording that all of the schools were committed to the league.
Not really. (By the way, check out the story just for the punchdrunk picture of Marinatto. I want some photoshopped submissions based on that picture. Please!)
This was a meeting of all seven school presidents and ADs. Well, not quite. UConn has no AD, and their President had other commitments outside of conference survival. UConn Pres. Susan Herbst just issued a statement on Facebook.
“The past several days have magnified the period of instability that exists today in the world of college athletics. I want to say thank you to all of our loyal supporters and fans of UConn and our athletic programs for their patience during this time.
“Please know that we will always do what is in the best interests for the University of Connecticut.
“We remain committed to our ideals and principals in intercollegiate athletics and will continue to achieve excellence academically and athletically.”
Two words missing completely from this statement: “Big” and “East.” Everyone feeling the commitment? No? Not a surprise.
One official in the Big East who requested anonymity said that was not an accurate assessment of the sentiment in the room. The official said league schools are committed to recruiting more schools but did not make any pledge to remaining in the league until it’s clear what the league will look like.
The official also said about four or five of the Big East schools are committed to keeping the league together, but the other two or three need to know where the league is headed before a firm commitment is made.
Yeah. That seems to be the right POV.
About that direction, status quo is a big part of it.
Marinatto also said, “We had a conference call with nonfootball playing members yesterday and all of them unanimously supported their football brethren in order to move the conference forward with the same structure it’s been.”
That’s right, “same structure.” No split. That would be bad for Providence. Teams are bailing for the exit and they aren’t going to change anything. On the Banks (Rutgers) as you would expect is taking this news in a calm, measured manner.
How about those future members?
…the Big East was in the final stages of acquiring Navy as a football-only member.
No official invitation was extended by the league, but both parties had extensive discussions about Navy joining the league in football only and it very well could have happened in the next couple of weeks, college football industry sources told CBSSports.com. Besides Navy, the Big East also was targeting Air Force and league sources felt confident both schools would have been Big East members, perhaps within the next year – that is until Pitt and Syracuse announced they were leaving for the ACC.
Navy and Air Force as football only members? Because football only members worked so well back in the 90s. It didn’t breed hostility and other divisions at all. Speaking of the 90s (oh, you know it is coming):
There has been “mutual interest” between the Big East football conference and Temple, “maybe more intense recently,” a source said Tuesday just before officials from schools that play Big East football met in New York.
Oh, it gets better. ECU as usual wants to know it’s available and willing (as usual).
[NY Times Reporter, Pete] Thamel tweeted that the East Carolina has applied for the Big East and is not shy about it. ECU noted that it “copied about 50 people on the e-mail.”
Maybe Marinatto wasn’t joking when he suggested that the Big East might play their tournament in Greensboro someday.
With WVU shut out of both the SEC and ACC at this time, the only other Big East football team with a possible out is Louisville. The Big 12 is surviving for another day. Maybe up to 5 years. They will likely go after BYU first, but failing that Louisville is still a possibility. Card Chronicle sets out the simple choice.
As far as Louisville is concerned, it appears there are now just two options: 1) A slightly weakened Big East or 2) A pretty strong (in both sports) Big 12.
Neither is a great option, but at least they might have a choice.
Finally, Nunes Magician (Syracuse) is a little tired of the talk of backstabbing and betrayal for leaving the Big East. Points out the reality.
The statement is at the Post-Gazette website.
Marinatto is full of it.
Even if the BE falls apart as a multisport conference I still expect that the Catholic League will remain in BB. And that out of pure spite it will block any efforts on the part of the ACC in using MSG for the hoops tournament.
Which is just as well. There’s a bright shiny new gym in Brooklyn to be used. Not to mention using the New Meadowlands for the FB title game. Heck, throw Dan Snyder a bone and hold the FB title game in Raljon.
With the Pac-12 pressing the “stop” button last night, I expect that things will calm down. For a while. Which just adds fuel to the fire for the next go-around. Plenty of time for schools like UConn, Rutgers, ND, and PSU to think about where they want to be.
Rev George, I have been saying that for 6 months now. Again, I offer the following:
- after the B10 announced expansion intentions, there were literally hunderds of thousands of internet blogs and articles about this scenario or that rumor. Yet, the possibility of the B10 adding only Nebraska was never discussed in any of them
- After the recent Texas A&M / SEC incident, again the papers and the internet were loaded with expansion possibiliites … but as of a week ago at this time, did anyone ention the possibility of Pitt and Syracuse joining the ACC?
- Even yesterday at this time, it seemed to be the media consensus that Oklahoma and Texas were headed to the Pac 12 .. but once again, they really didn’t know.
The fact is that the newpapers and blogs, including this one, are filled with comments based purely on unfounded speculation
Is it a matter of having to break or modify TV agreements, other contractual abrogations, things like that?
Just wondering what the real motivations are here other than people being pissed off…
Also, even if the league does only have 8, they may be scrambling to schedule 5 non-conference games in the nest couple of years
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-f9O0eZjUI&feature=player_embedded#!
I will respond to your question about the ACC adding 2 teams. I believe they will be in no hurry if they think there is any chance that ND or PSU would consider joining. My guess is that they love to have any combination of ND, PSU or UConn.
As soon as they are assured that ND and PSU are not coming, then they will accept UConn and Rutgers.
Good point, ACC pulls out 2 more BigEast teams to implode the league, therefore no 27 month waiting period.
My take; as time goes on, Marinatto’s stance becomes less rigid on the 27 months. Of course, right after Pitt & Cuse exiting, they have to put on this ‘tough guy’ stance. This happens is all business dealings.
First, tough stance, as time passes, that stance becomes less and less rigid.
Take everything you hear at the moment coming out of Providence, with the proverbial…Grain of Salt
“[Gordon] was the starter at the beginning of the year and has a lot of potential,” Graham said. “I just think that we have to put the best guys out there that give us the best chance to win, and Max [Gruder] and Tristan are experienced and not making those mistakes and have come into play.
Ok TG, let’s get our best QB OUT THERE AS WELL.
1) Anderson runs this offense way better than present QB and can’t be worse.
2) Myers has a better arm, is more accurate, spins the ball as TD said and since the current QB can’t run the Triple Option anyway, what’s the big deal if Myers can’t either. But is a way more accurate passer.
3) Let’s cut the shit TG and make the change now.
I don’t feel like attending some shit bowl again.
And getting blown out by the Hoopies again.
Comment by melvinbennett 09.21.11 @ 4:11 pm
1) If they are still in the BE, then they still get their share of any $$$ revenue sharing. Really think the BB schools in the BE are gonna want to watch Pitt and ‘Cuse storm through the BE tourney and then are going to want to share money with Pitt just to keep them around…!?!? The BE people are lazy and behind the times, but they are not stupid when it comes to0 money…..
2) As long as Pitt & ‘Cuse are kept in the the BE they are “Voting Members” on any proposals the Commish tries to pass. Anybody really think a higher exit fee is gonna pass while Pitt, ‘Cuse, UC, Rutgers, WV and possibly Louisville want out??
As for WV to the SEC, southern writers are saying… whoa !!
1) WV does not increase the amount of TV cash coming in. WV population base is small and not growing, but yet adding WV would shrink the “per school” money share. Not a good tradeoff.
2) WV is way down on the academics list at about 161st or less, while everyone else in the ACC ( including Pitt & ‘Cuse ) are above 101st. Not good for the ACC’s rep.
3) WV fans are consider ( right or wrongly ) as hooligans. Again, nothing here is make the ACC look better.
Sounds like WV would be better fit for Big 10…
According to some reports, Notre Dame, despite all the BS coming from their AD, opened up the door a crack by saying that if they were going to join a conference, it would be the ACC. Some of the insiders keep bringing them up as a potential ACC member too.
So, if you’re the ACC, would you jump and invite UConn as #15 and then Rutgers at #16 right away? Or would you wait to see if ND is serious about joining, and on your terms? I think that may be what’s going on right now, and nothing may happen until the chips start falling in other conferences again.
Didn’t know about the BCS 8-school viability rule. 5 OOC games seems quite problematic as well.
Hope things work out somehow for a quick exit. 3 years seems like a LONNNNG time
But that’s NOT going to happen with the present guy playing at QB.
Because…..guess what….the BIgEast TV contract renews in 2012 and the ACC has to renegotiate their TV contract as well. And Big DADDY ESPN is the one handing out……’spending money’.
Case closed !
I’d say that was relevant. (not aimed at TX Panther)
>BigTroll.
What does Mr SEC think about that? Haven’t read his blog yet. I would think once you rebuff a school, that would be it. WVU doesn’t add much value to the SEC. Yes they have rabid fans and travel well, but that’s NOT what it’s all about.
To think that the Big East is better than that is maddening.
TG took this job and spoke of not only winning the BE, but competing of Nat’l Championships. Whether we are in the BE or ACC, if he produces like he thinks he can, it doesn’t matter where we play.
MelvinBennett, you are the man! Love your posts!
I always thought of them as a decent rival much like the Cuse. Moreover, will make for some fun tailgates in the Fall for those that can travel.
BC also made Pitt’s BCS trip possible back in 2004 when the Cuse upset them 43-17 on the last game of the year. We beat BC 20-17 in OT that year enabling Pitt to share the BE title and win the tiebreaker.
Remember that 20-17 Pitt win over BC very well, that’s when Palko trucked over one of BC’s DB’s on a QB scramble. It lit the fuse for PITT that year.
We got jobbed in the Fiesta Bowl. Roughing on the PITT punter was never called on a clear call. And that was early in the 2nd quarter or so when the game was still 7-7 or in that area. PITT gets that call there, (which they should have) and scores some points, it’s a different game.
After you get a blatantly bad call like that, as a player, you start thinking to yourself, WTF is going on here.
As did the Brian Kelly factor enter into the Pitt/Cincy debacle a few years ago.
Hopefully some of these ‘factors’ will be helpful to PITT, but in a positive manner in the future.
That may be the real reason that the ACC hasn’t moved to #15 and #16 yet, FRANKCAN. I think UConn would be a good addition for them, especially in basketball, and for the additional TV reach.
And, you’re welcome from me too.
Ah, I think your a bit off. Add to that, that UCONN and WVU will probably be gone also.
Who does that leave??? Notre Dame and Villanova???
BCS qualification is coming up for renogtiations again in a year or two. It’s not the quantity of teams, it’s the quality.
Who will they have???? For football??? Adding Navy and Air Force, E.Carolina????
I will tell you this my friend, and you can quote me on it………..”I will never rue the day, and never look back, and never, ever, even have one thought of wishing we ever back in the Big Least ever again”.
Staying in a league that never listened to the football schools, were more worried about Seton Hall, DePaul and Providence, than they ever were about Pitt, Syracuse or WVU.
Stay in a league that is one phone call away from imploding every day??
Oh, I see you said, Navy and UCF, ya, that ought to get the BCS’s bloods pumping!!! Woo Hoo!!! Get E.Carolina and Memphis, and you really got something there!!! LOL!!!
Nope, we got a seat at the show. Might lose the WVU rivalry, small potatoes in the grand scheme of things.
Sacriledge you say?? Let me give you two options.
A. Stay in the Big East, and you get to keep rivalry with WVU.
B. Lose rivalry with WVU, but, you now joining one of the main 4 conferences, you have just solidified your future for all sports for the next eons. Now with teams like Maryland, VA TECH, FLA St, Miami, Duke, N.Car et al, instead of
Cincinnati, USF, Seton Hall, possibly UCF, and E.Carolina????
Are you effin’ kiddin’ me???? LOL!!!!
So long!!!!
Plus, as some have said, got that big matzah ball out there, ND.
Have to wait and see.
I’ve looked at your blogs the past month. Many of you were giddy with the rumor of the SEC. The blogs were alive with, “oh man, can’t wait for Bama to come to Morgantown.” “Woo hoo, road trip to Gainesville”.
One guy couldn’t even wait to play the Mississippi’s, so he could parlay that trip with gambling in Biloxi and a week on the gulf coast.
So, please, don’t be mad at us, you were all, allready, looking in your rear view mirror.
Four (4) ACC teams in Top 25 this week
That’s as many as the L1G and only 1 less than the
vaunted SEC & the Hatfield/McCoy Conf. (B12) haha
If that were to happen let the ACC add UConn and let the BIG add ND and Rutgers (screw the hoopies).
I frankly do not want ND in the conference as I do not think we could trust them for very long.
Thanks for pointing it out again, Jeff in CPa, and thanks for posting the link, Steve.
If you guys haven’t watched it, you need to. Here’s the link again courtesy of steve.
Some comic relief:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-f9O0eZjUI&feature=player_embedded#!
Comment by steve 09.21.11 @ 4:16 pm
1) DeLoss Dodds & Joe Castiglione re-enact the final dramatic scene of ‘High Noon’ (somehow I think a guy named Castiglione wins that one)
2) Bevo chases the Sooner Schooner around the stadium, while the Ruf/neks inside the schooner shoot arrows at him. (can’t get rifles inside the Cotton Bowl)
3)After the Halftime entertainment ends Presidents Bill Powers & David Boren conclude the events by stating how much they’re both committed to staying in the Big 12 and at precisely the moment that stmt. ends, they both get:
Cream Pied in the FACE !
RFLMAO
It’s all very positive. Let’s give the guy some views and show him we appreciate his positive stance on PITT. And the Panther mascot!
- they are being treated as the eastern stepchild, JoePa has urged the B10 to bring in a sister team but has been given a deaf ear
- while the B10 has a very attractive TV contract, the ACC’s contract is nothing to sneeze at … and if PSU commits, the ACC has the leverage to renegotiate an even better deal (and if somehow PSU & ND comes as a package, then the sky is the limit)
- PSU football recruiting should get better – note while they do well in the midwest, they do not do well in the fertile areas Florida and Georgia. This would change if tey join the ACC
- their basketball recruiting will definetly get better. They actually might be able to get a few blue chips from NJ/NYC, Baltimore and DC.
- their athletic travel budget will decrease. Yes,tey would still have to travel to FL (nstead of Iowa, Nebraska, Minn and Wisc) but overall, there would be less traveling .. Pitt, Maryland, Cuse, BC and UVA are minor trips compared to many they are currently taking
- JoePa actually hinted about it yesterday although he may have been postioning an argment for the B10 to seriously consider Rutgers
Again, it’s a long shot but not completely out of the question
In football, I don’t see how they keep the BCS bid unless the keep WVU….and they might not even if WVU stays…
But I have ZERO regrets with this move by Pitt to the ACC. I’ve said all along that a BE- ACC merger was my hope and that is essentially what we have, just not in name.
I’m also glad that the ACC seems patient enough to wait for school’s 15 & 16. No need to rush for Rutgers & UCONN even though that would free up Pitt to leave earlier. I prefer waiting to see if we can land ND – but only if they come in as equal football partners, not the agreement they had with the BE. Pitt & ND playing yearly in the “ACC NORTH” has instant tradition and rivalry tradition written all over it. (just a little bit better than the river city trophy whatever it was called)
But I am also glad that Pitt will be (as of now) the primary ACC recruiter and school in the Ohio, WV, PA, NJ area. That’s not something I would want to give up easily.
The only thing better might be the look on Paterno’s face. It might just push him over the edge…
Don’t know the other guy but considering he’s in Providence, who knows who’s feeding him the info. Did Brett confirm it or just say it was being reported?
While unlikely, I have no proof other than your opinions that ND & PS are definitely out of the question. I agree with you that it is unlikely, but not that it is only a dream land.
As many others have posted here, Paterno’s nearing the end, PS is the eastern stepchild of the Big 10. They have no rival, long travel and a completely different culture. Beiing in the Big 10 has helped OSU & Michigan to recruit in PA more than it has helped Penn Sate.
Either way, there’s no need to hurry. I don’t think anyone else is in a hurry to land UCONN or Rutgers… Go for a big fish while we can…
12. If the SEC winds up with West Virginia,
you’ll know it had to go the fallback route.
West Virginia has approached the ACC and the SEC. The ACC has apparently chosen four schools over WVU: Pitt, Syracuse, UConn and Rutgers. The Big Ten was rumored to be looking East and South toward Maryland, UConn, Rutgers and Georgia Tech last year. Never were the Mountaineers mentioned.
We’ve already explained why — small state, so-so academic reputation, small television markets.
If the ACC took four teams from the Big East and chose not to pursue West Virginia, how could the SEC go for the Mountaineers without looking like an inferior league to the ACC?
Now, if the SEC raids the ACC and makes off with team or three, then you’ll know that the SEC is indeed as big and bad as so many fans claim on messageboards and talk radio shows. If the SEC grabs coveted, big name schools, you’ll know that Slive was right all along about getting to 16 schools in 15 minutes. You’ll know that the SEC is indeed a very attractive destination.
Oh and btw,.,…If ESPN wants us & Cuse in the ACC earlier than 27 months, they’ll just pick up the phone and call that fool Marinatto and lay down the law.
Because…..guess what….the BIgEast TV contract renews in 2012 and the ACC has to renegotiate their TV contract as well. And Big DADDY ESPN is the one handing out……’spending money’.
Case closed !
Comment by melvinbennett 09.21.11 @ 4:41 pm
Athletically they don’t add much.
TV wise, their value is for Cable subscribers, but wait a minute, the ACC doesn’t have an ACC network.
Rutgers has little value on regular TV since I’m not thinking they’re a ratings juggernaut(am I missing something here), as they are hardly, if at all on TV on a Regional basis, let alone a National basis. And are New Jerseyans really going to watch UNC vs. Clemson.
If a school brings little to no value, it’s only another mouth to feed.
You guys are going to enjoy the October & November road games down here. The weather is usually the years best. September can be very warm, but this year it has been very pleasant.
And the ACC cheerleaders are Head & Shoulders over the BigEast gals. No question about that.
No problem – no offense taken. If I were betting I would bet you are are right and ND is just playing others for down the road. And as I posted, I have mixed feelings on adding Penn State.
HOWEVER, I just don’t think UCONN & Rutgers really offer that much in regards to ratings, rivals or recruiting. At least not for football. I’m not opposed to them. I just don’t see any reason to rush to add them before you swing for the fences. I like Pitt’s position in the current ACC as far as recruting goes. I bet there are a lot of players in PA, OH, WV & NJ who would love to play against the likes of Miami and FSU. We will lose some of these guys to the other ACC schools, but I think we can clean up against whatever is left of the BE – our tradtional recruiting battles.
So hopefully they can decide soon how they are going to replenish the conference, because the sooner that is done the sooner we can move on.
One of the big problems with the ESPN article is that it fails to mention that 10 other teams inquired about entry into the ACC.
If you are Pitt fan how would you have felt on Saturday if they said UConn and Syracuse were leaving for the ACC?
How would you feel right now if they rumored that Rutgers and Lousiville were the next to go?
The fact remains you can suggest the Pitt administration jumped the gun and may have a point.
But it’s not like they upped and left without warning and it’s not like they were the only one inquiring about dancing.
They did what they had to. Unlike the Big East, Pitt was proactive and didn’t become a victim.
I applaud them for that.
DaveD
Frankly don’t care if we wallow in football or go backward in hoops.
I doubt either one, but, Louis, one thing you need to remember………………
We’re in the ACC baby!!!!!!!!!! WOO HOO!!!
ACC-ACC-ACC-ACC-ACC!!!!!! YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The truth of the matter is that everything is speculation at this point. Nobody knows how Pitt will do in the ACC. BC has pretty much $#%& the bed while VT has held firm on football and steadily bettered their basketball team. Those jokers on ESPN really have no idea how Pitt will do in the ACC. I’m just glad we are in a safer place now. This is real money we are talking about. Its not all pretend. Pitt will be able to use that money to better their facilities and help real students. Huge win.
We would’ve stayed in the BE if it weren’t for that idiot.
Kinda sounds like we were foreced to go to this ACC.
Not a good way to start IMHO…gotta say this is the place we wanna be. Big East is a good conferene and all but the ACC is where it’s at.
Enough can be said by others…the administration needs to look forward.
DaveD


