masthead.jpg

switchconcepts.com, U3dpdGNo-a25, DIRECT rubiconproject.com, 14766, RESELLER pubmatic.com, 30666, RESELLER, 5d62403b186f2ace appnexus.com, 1117, RESELLER thetradedesk.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER taboola.com, switchconceptopenrtb, RESELLER bidswitch.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER contextweb.com, 560031, RESELLER amazon-adsystem.com, 3160, RESELLER crimtan.com, switch, RESELLER quantcast.com, switchconcepts , RESELLER rhythmone.com, 1934627955, RESELLER ssphwy.com, switchconcepts, RESELLER emxdgt.com, 59, RESELLER appnexus.com, 1356, RESELLER sovrn.com, 96786, RESELLER, fafdf38b16bf6b2b indexexchange.com, 180008, RESELLER nativeads.com, 52853, RESELLER theagency.com, 1058, RESELLER google.com, pub-3515913239267445, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
March 4, 2009

Health Is Always a Factor

Filed under: Basketball,Injury,Internet,Media — Chas @ 12:34 am

Both papers had stories on the good health of the team this year.  Well, yeah.

Luke Winn isn’t picking a winner yet for the NCAA Tournament, but has a top-3 that you should lean towards.

4. Are you a Pitt person, a UConn person or a Carolina person? Those are the only three teams I’d advise picking to win the national championship in your bracket. Vegas still views it as the Tar Heels’ title to lose — it likes them more than three times as much it as it likes the Panthers — but all three are viable options. Which one you pick is a matter of taste: Pitt is a tough, offensive-rebounding monster that can look vulnerable if DeJuan Blair gets in foul trouble; UConn is an athletic, shot-blocking force that’s the stingiest team of the three, but is missing its best perimeter defender, Jerome Dyson; Carolina is a high-octane scoring machine that’s prone to huge lapses in its perimeter D. As of now I’m a UConn person, because I tend to side with the superior defense … but I reserve the right to change tastes before my bracket is filled.

Bob Knight breaks down Pitt’s poor rebounding when Blair is out.

Brandin Knight doesn’t want to hear crap from people.

Nevertheless, skeptics remain. When asked if Pitt needs to advance beyond the Sweet 16 for the season to be considered a success, Knight nearly recoiled from the question.

“Everybody now is like, ‘Oh, yeah, I’m a Pitt fan.’ You might have been a Pitt fan up until Charles Smith and those guys left, and then when things got bad you weren’t a fan anymore,” said Knight, 27. “Now, when you come back when things are going well, as soon as things get a little rocky, those are the people that turn around and are like, ‘Same old Pitt.’

“Everybody has their opinions. For some people, we have to get past the Sweet 16. Well, we have to get past the first round and the second round to get to the Sweet 16. Just getting past the Sweet 16 wouldn’t take this program to the next level. We want to win every game, and we don’t focus more on the Big East Tournament and just throw away the NCAA Tournament. We’re dedicated to winning every game.”

Love that. It just tells you how much the program means to Knight.

For all those wondering what Pitt was doing to get ready to deal with the press and teams trying to strip Pitt.

Pitt has averaged 20.5 turnovers in its past two games, and handling full-court pressure was a focal point at Monday’s practice. The whistles were put away.

“Coach Dixon told the press team to hack us and see how we are going to react,” guard Jermaine Dixon said. “We know we’ve got to cut down on the turnovers.”

Coach Dixon was apparently annoyed that the team spent too much time after turnovers whining at the officials. Let a team like Seton Hall chirp constantly. All it got them was 3 technicals in one game.





Pitt is all over the back page of today’s WSJ, its 3 day young sports page.

Check out page D8 for a picture of the Oakland Zoo (“witty and effective but not vulgar”) and a piece on DeJuan. And they’re doing a liveblog during the game tonight.

Comment by steve 03.04.09 @ 7:38 am

I’m not sure what Knight is trying to say. Is he a master of the obvious or implying that one of Pitt’s weaknesses is a lack of focus? I’d agree with the latter, but his analysis is simplistic to the point of puzzling. You could apply his comments to any team and they’d be valid.

Comment by Dave in Orlando 03.04.09 @ 9:10 am

one thing that many people just don’t realize is that Pitt rarely wins pretty — it is usually a grind it out win.

The ND, UNC and Dukes of the world wins pretty with their high octane scoring and fast-paced offense, but as we seen, they can be susceptible more than Pitt or UConn can.

An analogy could be the Big 12 South in football this past year. Great style points during the season but when they played real defenses,like in the bowl games, none of them excelled. UNC certianly has the talent to win it all and I wouldn’t be totally surprised if they did … however, I think it should be obvious that the field this year is wide open.

Comment by w bill 03.04.09 @ 9:40 am

The way I interpret Knights comments are as a rebuff to the Internet drama queens who, regardless of how well the team plays and what they accomplish, await the game that they finally lose to say, “See, I told you so.”

Or else, regardless of the notoriety the team achieves in terms of press clippings, rankings, or Big East Tourney success, look for the inevitable loss to validate their negativity towards Pitt and Coach Dixon.

Comment by Orange Julius Page 03.04.09 @ 10:23 am

bob knight likes pitt though… he basically said we lost because of ourselves… not because louisville beat us.

Comment by Snala the Panther 03.04.09 @ 10:27 am

the line is big for tonight — double digits — pitt is getting a ton of respect from Vegas, especially after Marquette (without James) played UConn and L-ville close.

I find the Vegas respect and the media attention absolutely amazing. Pitt has gone, all in the last couple of months, from a team that got NO national respect, to a team that gets maybe too much. All this for a program that, for all its wins, hasn’t gotten past the Sweet 16.

Don’t know about you guys, but I’d much rather fly under the radar, at least until having been to a couple Final 4s.

Comment by hugh green 03.04.09 @ 11:14 am

It seemed to me that Brandin was a little cranky when he was being interviewed. Seemed to be taking shots at Pitt fans in my opinion. Also, kind of wondered if he is upset that his teams did not make it past the Sweet Sixteen and all of the talk about it every year ticks him off even more.

Comment by Big Pitt Daddy 03.04.09 @ 11:31 am

bob knight picked us to win it all last yr. I think he’s a big fan of our “football like” mentality.

Comment by schoey 03.04.09 @ 12:05 pm

I agree, Big. And, if you’re right, Brandin shouldn’t be so upset since they really didn’t have the horses…and the bench…to pull it off.

I hope Brandin wasn’t talking about Chas and the rest of us who take part here. We’ve been loyal through thick and thin.

Comment by steve 03.04.09 @ 12:11 pm

well there are plenty of fair weather fans…. my freshman year was 2000-2001 season.. and thats when I started going to the games in the field house…it was nice..i could buy a ticket the day of the game and waltz right in…. then it turned into chaos… and you had girls who got season tickets that cared more about their makeup then cheering. I was lucky to have season tickets all my years at pitt.

Comment by Snala the Panther 03.04.09 @ 12:44 pm

I seriously started following Pitt hoops during the Buzz Ridl regime. When I was a student(’64 -’68) I didn’t attend even 1 basketball game. We were pretty bad those years even against local schools.

I recall with pride the ’74 SI story about our local talent.

Comment by steve 03.04.09 @ 1:16 pm

One of the things that I think Brandin Knight may have been reacting to was the tendency of certain members of the media and some fans to downplay the accomplishments of the teams from the past 9 years. For example, a certain recently retired curmudgeon at the Post-Gazette has continued to opine that winning the Big East Tournament is meaningless in judging the “success” of a given season. In particular, he seems to believe that last year’s team was a “failure” for not moving past the 2nd round of the NCAA’s. My impression is that this particular scribe never played the game. Winning a tournament at any level is a thrill, and to the players (not just at Pitt), cutting down the nets at the Big East Tourney is an accomplishment they will carry with them the rest of their lives. Part of Knight’s point is that the players play to win EVERY game, and part of his frustration seems to be with fans who don’t get this (or don’t agree with this). I don’t know if it is fair for Knight to judge casual fans like this, although I will admit that I (as a fan) do get frustrated when I hear people label seasons such as last year as a “failure” or and “underachievement” because they ONLY won the Big East.

Comment by Pantherman13 03.04.09 @ 1:19 pm

Brandin was talking about all the negativity Pitt “fans” have been spewing ever since the Providence loss. I have seen people say typical Pitt all over the internet like in the comments at post-gazette.com say things like typical Pitt, no chance they are getting out of the Sweet 16 because they are the same as always and Pitt just isn’t good enough. Pitt has the number 1 RPI and is one of the few teams with only 3 losses in the whole nation. So I think Brandin has a right to be ticked off at people who are down on this team, and who are already assuming Pitt will “underachieve.” No one goes undefeated in conference play unless you are Memphis and play inferior teams every game.

Comment by MartyTheParty 03.04.09 @ 1:40 pm

steve – I believe Buzz Ridl may have been the most important coach in Pitt history … or at least until Howland came to town. When you were in school in the mid to late 60s, you may remember that Duquesne under Coach Red Manning ruled the city of Pgh. Duquesne had the bigger stars (a couple made the pros)while the Panthers were avaerage at best. When Ridl left Pitt in 76, this was reversed. Pitt was the better program.

When the Big East came calling for a Pgh team in early 80s, they had to decide between Pitt and Duquesne. If Duquesne had the better program like they did back in late 60s (before Ridl), history could have been re-written and Duquesne would have probably joined the BE … wit Pitt stuck in A-8 (now A-10.)

Comment by w bill 03.04.09 @ 5:11 pm

that’s an interesting historical account w bill… as much as we complain about the big east at times, i cannot imagine where the university would be today without membership. i seriously doubt pitt would be a top 20 public institution if that BE invite never materialized, and we certainly would not be a national force in basketball.

Comment by Greg in New Orleans 03.04.09 @ 5:25 pm

How sweet would it be if when Dixon steps down in a couple decades Knight is our next coach?

Knight was just taking shots at the SLYs…”self loathing yinzers” – you know the type, they start whining when we go down 2-0 at the beginning of the game, when we’re down 5 at the half, and are just waiting for us not to win the NC to say exactly what he pointed out…”see, same old pitt”. Too bad having one of the highest winning percentages this decade, etc, is not good enough for these assholes because we haven’t been in the top 4 of a tourney yet. Its ridiculous.

They should all be George Mason fans.

Comment by Stuart 03.04.09 @ 5:53 pm

Good point, w bill. Too bad his successor, Tim Grgurich, was so enigmatic back then.

For more history see:
link to en.wikipedia.org

(which would probably not even be listed if not for Buzz!)

Comment by steve 03.04.09 @ 6:00 pm

Greg, we may have had a similar recent history to Duquesne had they and not us been accepted into the BE… althouh we can assume that the BE would have still have got into football in the early 90s, and if so, it would have recuited Pitt as it did Miami, Va Tech and WVU. But even if that did happen, we would have never had Charles Smith, Jerome Lane, Brian Shorter or Sean Miller … and there is also no reason to expect for the scenario to work out that Howland would come to Pitt. Who knows? Nonetheless, I cannot emphasize my thinking of how important Ridl was to Pitt.

Comment by w bill 03.04.09 @ 6:03 pm

Now it’s time to tape up. Good luck and HAIL TO PITT!

Comment by steve 03.04.09 @ 6:05 pm

Powered by WordPress © PittBlather.com

Site Meter