<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early Eyeballing the 2008 Season</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/</link>
	<description>The rantings and commentary on Pitt football and basketball ... and anything else from a distracted mind</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo Covert's my Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101859</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo Covert's my Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 00:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101859</guid>
		<description>I think sometimes you overrated USF because we kind "want" the Big East to have another legit Top 25 school.

I'll lay it out real simple, from someone that lives in Tampa and sees a lot of their games.  Decent defense or not, Grothe gets hurt and/or tired, USF loses.  He carries the offense and the defense isn't good enough to carry the team alone.  Their offensive line sucks, that's why he has to scramble to make those amazing plays all the time.

Their offensive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think sometimes you overrated USF because we kind &#8220;want&#8221; the Big East to have another legit Top 25 school.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll lay it out real simple, from someone that lives in Tampa and sees a lot of their games.  Decent defense or not, Grothe gets hurt and/or tired, USF loses.  He carries the offense and the defense isn&#8217;t good enough to carry the team alone.  Their offensive line sucks, that&#8217;s why he has to scramble to make those amazing plays all the time.</p>
<p>Their offensive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pitt1972</title>
		<link>http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101846</link>
		<dc:creator>pitt1972</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101846</guid>
		<description>"I have seen many cite that Pitt lost 4 of its games by 7 or fewer points. That just a couple bounces, a couple less injuries (or better officiating *cough* Rutgers *cough*) and Pitt would have been at least 6-6 or even, possibly 8-4. Suggesting how close Pitt might be.

On the flip side, though, Pitt also won 3 games by 7 or fewer points. Meaning that a 3-4 record in tight games suggests Pitt was very close to where they should have been, record-wise."

Personally speaking, I don't entirely accept this line of reasoning.  IMO, some games that were tight wins wouldn't have been very close except for the awful QBing problems.  Likewise, IMO, some of the close losses would have clearly been wins with stronger QB play.  In fact, one could argue that at least one of the not so close losses might have been a win with more solid QB play--the USF game.  Recall that in that game 3 picks of the QB yielded 21 points--2 for immediate TDs and 1 that put the ball at the 1 yd line for a third "gift" TD.  IMO, with solid QB play there may not have been a single unwinable game last season because even the two least competitive games (UConn and Virginia) might have been competive had they not been played at the low point of the season in terms of compounded QBing problems that, IMO, resulted in a temporarily very discouraged defensive unit (think 3 game defensive funk--UConn, Virginia, Navy).  I expect those games would have had a very differnt character had they been played in the 2nd half of the season when QBing was improved just enough that (with the exception of 2nd half of the USF game) all games were competitive due to a reduction in offensive mistakes and a defense with regained confidence.  So, IMO, the potential, at least, is there for a very very strong season in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have seen many cite that Pitt lost 4 of its games by 7 or fewer points. That just a couple bounces, a couple less injuries (or better officiating *cough* Rutgers *cough*) and Pitt would have been at least 6-6 or even, possibly 8-4. Suggesting how close Pitt might be.</p>
<p>On the flip side, though, Pitt also won 3 games by 7 or fewer points. Meaning that a 3-4 record in tight games suggests Pitt was very close to where they should have been, record-wise.&#8221;</p>
<p>Personally speaking, I don&#8217;t entirely accept this line of reasoning.  IMO, some games that were tight wins wouldn&#8217;t have been very close except for the awful QBing problems.  Likewise, IMO, some of the close losses would have clearly been wins with stronger QB play.  In fact, one could argue that at least one of the not so close losses might have been a win with more solid QB play&#8211;the USF game.  Recall that in that game 3 picks of the QB yielded 21 points&#8211;2 for immediate TDs and 1 that put the ball at the 1 yd line for a third &#8220;gift&#8221; TD.  IMO, with solid QB play there may not have been a single unwinable game last season because even the two least competitive games (UConn and Virginia) might have been competive had they not been played at the low point of the season in terms of compounded QBing problems that, IMO, resulted in a temporarily very discouraged defensive unit (think 3 game defensive funk&#8211;UConn, Virginia, Navy).  I expect those games would have had a very differnt character had they been played in the 2nd half of the season when QBing was improved just enough that (with the exception of 2nd half of the USF game) all games were competitive due to a reduction in offensive mistakes and a defense with regained confidence.  So, IMO, the potential, at least, is there for a very very strong season in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wild Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101803</link>
		<dc:creator>wild Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 11:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101803</guid>
		<description>I wonder why nobody but me is appalled by the fact that Pitt has to play at Syracuse on a Saturday, and then must travel to USF for a Thursday game -- as if the game at USF won't be tough enough.  Even the NFL, who has fulltime fb players, will not schedule back-to-back away games (prior weekend and Thursday.)  Now look at WVU schedule, and see how thye are set up prior to their big games bext year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why nobody but me is appalled by the fact that Pitt has to play at Syracuse on a Saturday, and then must travel to USF for a Thursday game &#8212; as if the game at USF won&#8217;t be tough enough.  Even the NFL, who has fulltime fb players, will not schedule back-to-back away games (prior weekend and Thursday.)  Now look at WVU schedule, and see how thye are set up prior to their big games bext year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Birman</title>
		<link>http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101799</link>
		<dc:creator>George Birman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 11:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101799</guid>
		<description>If Wanny doesn't go 8-4 with the talent they have; then something is wrong with the coaching staff.

Do not discount UConn in FB, they have a very good coach and he is a stand up guy!

Calhoun on the other hand is a turd!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Wanny doesn&#8217;t go 8-4 with the talent they have; then something is wrong with the coaching staff.</p>
<p>Do not discount UConn in FB, they have a very good coach and he is a stand up guy!</p>
<p>Calhoun on the other hand is a turd!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geeman2001</title>
		<link>http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101780</link>
		<dc:creator>geeman2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 22:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101780</guid>
		<description>No "Certain wins," eh?  

There's a healthy difference of opinion here, but one thing I think all of us can agree on:   Pitt should not, should never have before, and should never  ever lose again in the future, to UConn.  

Home, away, neutral site, doesn't matter.  I don't care if they play in the Mali desert village where Jim Calhoun finds his recruits:  If we lose to UConn again this year, Dave should resign or be crucified on the Cathedral lawn.  Or both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No &#8220;Certain wins,&#8221; eh?  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a healthy difference of opinion here, but one thing I think all of us can agree on:   Pitt should not, should never have before, and should never  ever lose again in the future, to UConn.  </p>
<p>Home, away, neutral site, doesn&#8217;t matter.  I don&#8217;t care if they play in the Mali desert village where Jim Calhoun finds his recruits:  If we lose to UConn again this year, Dave should resign or be crucified on the Cathedral lawn.  Or both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcofan</title>
		<link>http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101777</link>
		<dc:creator>alcofan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 22:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101777</guid>
		<description>My concerns are coaching and o-line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My concerns are coaching and o-line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtads14</title>
		<link>http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101763</link>
		<dc:creator>jtads14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittblather.com/2008/05/09/5122/#comment-101763</guid>
		<description>I saw this article a couple days ago about Ben Mauk and figured I would give an update since he was mentioned in this post.  But they denied him a 6th year so he won't be back.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3245700</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this article a couple days ago about Ben Mauk and figured I would give an update since he was mentioned in this post.  But they denied him a 6th year so he won&#8217;t be back.</p>
<p><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3245700" rel="nofollow">http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3245700</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
