<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kent St.-Pitt: Media Recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pittblather.com/2006/03/18/kent-st-pitt-media-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pittblather.com/2006/03/18/kent-st-pitt-media-recap/</link>
	<description>The rantings and commentary on Pitt football and basketball ... and anything else from a distracted mind</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pitt Blather &#8212; The Rantings Continue Permalink &#187; Recycled BET Unimportant Story</title>
		<link>http://www.pittblather.com/2006/03/18/kent-st-pitt-media-recap/#comment-97320</link>
		<dc:creator>Pitt Blather &#8212; The Rantings Continue Permalink &#187; Recycled BET Unimportant Story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittblather.com/2006/03/18/kent-st-pitt-media-recap/#comment-97320</guid>
		<description>[...] For Pitt, though, it is overemphasized because they had nothing left for the NCAA Tournament. Really, if Smizik was going to recycle a column, I would have expected his 2006 complaint about Pitt not being a good shooting team. You know, because they were too focused on defense and rebounding. He couldn&#8217;t complain about it in 2005, because Pitt lost in the first round of the BET. Don&#8217;t worry, he doubled it up in 2004, with focus on the unimportance of the BET and the regular season title, but then complained about how flawed Pitt was after losing the BET. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For Pitt, though, it is overemphasized because they had nothing left for the NCAA Tournament. Really, if Smizik was going to recycle a column, I would have expected his 2006 complaint about Pitt not being a good shooting team. You know, because they were too focused on defense and rebounding. He couldn&#8217;t complain about it in 2005, because Pitt lost in the first round of the BET. Don&#8217;t worry, he doubled it up in 2004, with focus on the unimportance of the BET and the regular season title, but then complained about how flawed Pitt was after losing the BET. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
